[lac-discuss-en] ALAC Members de LACRALO

[Harold Arcos]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]


Subject:Re:  ALAC Members de LACRALO
Desde:Harold Arcos <harold.arcos at gmail.com>


Thanks Alberto for calling this point.
It will be noticed for the discussion topics.
I understand you totally when you refer to the groups in which one is active and studying documents even in periods without an elected role, because it is a custom that one acquires when working in distributed groups in addition to our regional construction space within ICANN .Just today two colleagues from different regions told me that they thought it was strange not to see me at the ALAC meeting, because we usually met in other groups, one of them gave me notes of topics that I will expand with my usual review of the notes and recordings. Your reflection is very important,
regards

Sent from my device. Apologies for brevity and typos.

On Apr 23 2019 1:37 pm, <alberto at soto.net.ar> wrote:
Dear, as most of you know, there are several of us who attend monthly ALAC meetings without having to attend.
In today's monthly meeting, at the beginning there was only one ALAC Member of LACRALO, Ricardo Holmquist who has practically perfect attendance. Besides, we were without obligation, Vanda and me. A few minutes later, Dev joined, who also attends several meetings and WGs.
A second ALAC Member of LACRALO entered the half hour and the rest was absent and did not send apologies.
In many of the monthly ALAC and ALT + meetings, the same thing is happening.
And it is in those meetings where the ALAC Board usually reaches consensus, including voting, requests information from the parties, etc. Today we talked in particular about the upcoming elections.
In all the moments before the elections, my question was whether all the applicants would have the time necessary to fulfill all their obligations, and everyone always answered that they would have that time.
My question is related to the fact that these faults can only be justified for reasons of force majeure that are occasional. It can not be said that it is not fulfilled because it is voluntary, because those who are elected have greater obligations than others.
It is that these faults make our Ralo not have an adequate representation, and the missing members do not have enough information to be able to represent us.I am not the only one who has observed this, there are several members of our Ralo who have commented in private.
I think we will have to emphasize this point in the next elections. And those who apply ensure that they will be able to fulfill the obligations they assume when accepting the position.

Best regards

Alberto Soto
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http: //www.lacralo. org

[[--Original text (es)
Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/50b4569607.html
--]]