[lac-discuss-en] Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large

Carlos Raul Gutierrez carlosraul at gutierrez.se
Sun May 20 17:20:18 UTC 2018


[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
[[--This message had format issues and was not translated properly--]]


Subject:Re: 	Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large
Desde:Carlos Raul Gutierrez <carlosraul at gutierrez.se>

Thanks Alejandro 100% according to your comments
On May 20, 2018 10:32:18 AM CST, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty at gmail.com> wrote:
Alberto,

Thank you for sharing these two statements of opinion from relevant groups of ICANN.While it is possible to disagree with aspects of each of them, especially the sectarian view that has taken over the NCSG, and others that will surely come, it is also possible to note that the complacency and lack of self-criticism that give rise to the ALAC proposal are being paid at a fair price.

This is not without its clear reflection in LACRALO, where the failure of the mediation process manifests itself in the repetition of the vices mentioned in the Review, in which the same old quarrels that gave rise to the conflict have been revived in non-public forums. place to mediation, and above all, to continue without focus on the development of policies, which was the number one agreement of mediation in February 2017.The only way forward is to review ALAC's responses with deep self-criticism, and not allow them to be transmitted officially in our representation until they are satisfactory; and in parallel, focus the expenditure of energy, time and other resources of LACRALO to the proposals sutantivas. The representatives and officials of LACRALO must notify ALAC that a proposal will be prepared and process what is necessary to build it before, during and after the ongoing electoral process, with the commitment of the new entrants to carry it out immediately.

Alejandro Pisanty

2018-05-20 10:23 GMT-05: 00 Alberto Soto <asoto at ibero-americano.org> :
Dear, in the note of NSCG, this note of the Contracted Party House is mentioned, whose terms are similar for the At-Large Review.
It is an unofficial translation and the short link to see the original published in ICANNhttps://goo.gl/NQzaVC

Best regards

Alberto Soto


May 7, 2018
FAO: Organizational Effectiveness Committee (OEC) of ICANN Board and Cherine
Chalaby, Chairman of the ICANN Board
Re: Statement of concern for At-Large Review Implementation Implementation Proposal
Dear members of Cherine and the Committee:
On behalf of the Contracted Party House (CPH) I would like to express our deep concern with the content and intent of the General Proposal for Implementation of the At-Large Review, which was published on April 20, 2018.
This proposal follows the 2017 At-Large Review.During the public comment period CPH, among many other SO / AC, sent critical comments that were subsequently included in the recommendations in the final report of ITEMS International. These recommendations, together with the feasibility assessment of the At-Large review and recommendations, and the ICANN staff designed the implementation plan with direct questions for ALAC.
The CPH considers that the aforementioned proposal does not address these issues, nor does it respond to the specific criticisms raised in the At-Large review report. In fact, all the recommendations have been rejected or modified.Furthermore, if the proposal is adopted by the OEC and the ICANN Board without the ALAC properly addressing the concerns of the wider ICANN community, this would set an alarming precedent for any future ICANN review. If critical opinions and recommendations, particularly those that are widely supported within the ICANN community, are perceived as ultimately ignorant,
The ICANN reviews will lose credibility.
The CPH believes that the Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the ICANN Board should not consider the ALAC proposal until such time as ALAC provides a detailed response that addresses the criticisms raised by the At-Large review report, and the questions kindly gathered by the ICANN staff. This response must be submitted to the entire ICANN community, so that any additional input or discussion with the community can be arranged, to see the Review to an appropriate end.
Yours sincerely,
Graeme Bunton
Chair RrSG
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http: //www.lacralo. org


-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM Av.Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 FROM MEXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog:http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http: // www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http
 ://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

[[--Original text (es)
Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b3949b6418.html
--]]


More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list