[lac-discuss-en] REMINDER VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT (EN): LACRALO Motion on the ALAC Statement on KSK Rollover

Wed May 2 02:22:40 UTC 2018

Vanda, Humberto,

that was exactly the proposal. Yet both of you voted against.

Anway, thanks to all who voted in favor. You voted for ALSs sharing responsibility with ICANN in favor of citizens as Internet users.

Yours,

Alejandro Pisanty

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
Facultad de Química UNAM
Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico

+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD

+525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .

________________________________
Desde: lac-discuss-en [lac-discuss-en-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] en nombre de Vanda Scartezini [vanda at scartezini.org]
Enviado el: lunes, 30 de abril de 2018 19:26
Hasta: Humberto Carrasco
CC: lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-en] REMINDER VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT (EN): LACRALO Motion on the ALAC Statement on KSK Rollover

Si todos los hacen es lo que necesitamos por aquí

Vanda Scartezini
Sent from my iPhone
Sorry for typos

On Apr 29, 2018, at 11:49 AM, Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob at gmail.com<mailto:hcarrascob at gmail.com>> wrote:

Dear Vanda,

I am with you. In our case, we have working with different actors in Chile to promote the implementation of the DNSSEC in the country. The issue was discussed in the last LAC-I-Road show in November Last year.

Regards

Enviado desde mi iPhone

El 29-04-2018, a la(s) 10:14, Vanda Scartezini <vanda at scartezini.org<mailto:vanda at scartezini.org>> escribió:

I am in favor to include the action from all ALSs - as I have done here- but vote against will not add value to the security - in our region penetration of DNSSEC us still not massive , then the impact will be less relevant, but I would recommended strongly the action to advise all others to be aware of the possible impact
Circulate a formal recommendation around our region may impact better than vote against if it is not included in the general recommendation
Best regards

Vanda Scartezini
Sent from my iPhone
Sorry for typos

On Apr 27, 2018, at 8:00 AM, ICANN At-Large Staff <staff at atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org>> wrote:

*** Reminder that the vote closes on Monday, April 30 at 23 UTC. ***

Dear All,

On behalf of the leaders of LACRALO we are launching the next vote from Wednesday, April 25 to Monday, April 30, at 23 UTC.

Alejandro Pisanty's motion says:

Colleagues,

In ALAC Statement on the KSK Rollover<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_dw28B&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=ds9md1zoepmwqw2nfk-Vs9ssxn1I3jPs97ekKkctEkM&m=LqLLP6jzmm647EMb_Yo56RDX42OnpsMqVFVxbG7RH-I&s=82TXan0oJ-ry3pA5L> you can see what the ALAC will put to the vote to express the opinion of the users about the KSK process, which as we all know is the rotation of the "keys" of the PKI system (public key cryptography) of the DNSSEC system that protects the system of domain names (DNS) against some significant attacks.

The text does not include the proposal that we made here in LACRALO that the ALSes assume a role in the dissemination of this process among ISPs, other providers, civil society, technical community and governments within our reach. Moreover, said text was included in a preliminary version and eliminated in the final. Eliminating the co-responsibility of the ALS puts us again in the role of petitioners who do not contribute with their own decision to the security, stability and robustness of the DNS, the primary responsibility of ICANN.

For this reason, I call on our ALAC representatives to insist on the inclusion of this text and, if it is not achieved, vote against the approval of the proposed text. Consider this proposal as a formal motion and proceed in abbreviated time so that it can be decided before the ALAC vote. If these times are not possible, be ex post-facto as a protest.

Are you in agreement with the motion presented by Mr. Alejandro Pisanty?
YES
NO

The voting process will be governed by Articles 12 (especially 12.8), 19 and 20 of the Rules of Procedure<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_cxDxAg&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=ds9md1zoepmwqw2nfk-Vs9ssxn1I3jPs97ekKkctEkM&m=LqLLP6jzmm647EMb_Yo56RDX42OnpsMqVFVxbG7RH-I&s=ZDnh0oY5Ceshjble>.

Kind Regards,

ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community
E-mail: staff at atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org>
Website: atlarge.icann.org<http://atlarge.icann.org/>
Facebook: facebook.com/icannatlarge<http://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>
Twitter: @ICANNAtLarge<http://www.twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>
<image001.png>

_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-en/attachments/20180502/2c8bd3de/attachment-0001.html>