[lac-discuss-en] Voto ALAC sobre KSK

[Alan Greenberg]

Alejandro,

The text of the comment does not reference "ALS", but it does 
reference "users".  Exactly how we plan to use the tools and 
documents we are asking for is not a critical part of the comment. 
What we are asking for is.

If we can get the tools and documents we are asking for, it will then 
be up to us (and hopefully other parts of the ICANN community as 
well) to use them. In our case, dissemination through our networks of 
ALSes and individual members will be one of the critical paths.

Using the At-Large network to spread the word about the KSK Rollover 
has already been the subject of several discussions with the Office 
of the Chief Technology Officer going back several months.

Regards, Alan

At 04/04/2018 02:13 PM, Alejandro Pisanty wrote:

>[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
>
>Subject: Voto ALAC sobre KSK
>Desde:Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty at gmail.com>
>
>Colleagues,
>
>inhttps://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+Workspace%3A+Plan+to+Restart+the+Root+Key+Signing+Key+%28KSK%29+Rollover+Process 
>you can see what ALAC will put to the vote to express the opinion of 
>the users about the KSK process, which as we all know is the 
>rotation of the "keys" of the PKI system (public key cryptography) 
>of the DNSSEC system that protects the system of domain names (DNS) 
>against some significant attacks.
>
>The text does not include the proposal that we made here in LACRALO 
>that the ALSs assume a role in the dissemination of this process 
>among ISPs, other providers, civil society, technical community and 
>governments within our reach. Moreover, said text was included in a 
>preliminary version and eliminated in the final. Eliminating the 
>co-responsibility of the ALS puts us again in the role of 
>petitioners who do not contribute with their own decision to the 
>security, stability and robustness of the DNS, the primary 
>responsibility of ICANN.
>
>For this reason, I call on our ALAC representatives to insist on the 
>inclusion of this text and, if it is not achieved, vote against the 
>approval of the proposed text. Consider this proposal as a formal 
>motion and proceed in abbreviated time so that it can be decided 
>before the ALAC vote. If these times are not possible, be ex 
>post-facto as a protest.
>
>Alejandro Pisanty
>
>-
>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro 
>Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM Av.Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico 
>DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 FROM MEXICO 
>SMS +525541444475 Blog:http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: 
>http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, 
>http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: 
>http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, 
>http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LinkedIn: 
>http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, 
>http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: 
>http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http: // 
>www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Join the UNAM group on 
>LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: 
>http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, 
>http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Twitter: 
>http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http
>  ://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ---- >> Join ISOC 
> Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>
>[[--Original text (es)
>Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04
>http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/03e31507e2.html
>--]]
>_______________________________________________
>lac-discuss-en mailing list
>lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en