[lac-discuss-en] Public comment closes 24 MAR 17

Thu Mar 23 02:05:36 UTC 2017

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: Public comment closes 24 MAR 17 
 Desde: asoto at ibero-americano.org

 Thank you very much Aida, this only reinforces my comments, I just hope comments 50 ALSes of our region. 

 I suggest all LACRALO verify the answers and make the final count, with descriptions of all our organizations that responded and what not. To do this, I suggest you can answer our fifty organizations, until the expiration of public comment. 

 Alberto Soto 

 From: Aida Noblia [mailto: aidanoblia at gmail.com] 
 Posted on: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 10:44 PM 
 To: Alberto Soto <asoto at ibero-americano.org>
 CC: Alexis Anteliz <antelizalexis at gmail.com> ; LACRALO <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
 Subject: [lac-discuss-en] public comment closes 24 MAR 17

 At the following address there is a space for wider comments: 

 https://community.icann.org/display/ALRW/Review+of+the+ICANN+At-Large+Community+-+Draft+Report+for+Public+Comment?focusedCommentId=64067053  &lt;  https://community.icann.org/display/ALRW/Review+of+the+ICANN+At-Large+Community+-+Draft+Report+for+Public+Comment?focusedCommentId=64067053&#comment-64067053> 

 Here is a list which also put a comment about not being able to put it in the template. 

 https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-atlarge-review-draft-report-01feb17/msg00006.html 

 I tried to put my comments in the template but it's too little, plus restricted only friendly to comment on the recommendations. It is very difficult to terminarlo..No can copy and paste originally written comments in another file, the letter and space are very limited 

 I regret the time but had another meeting my ALS and left a few minutes ago 

 regards 

 On 22 March 2017, 22:24, <asoto at ibero-americano.org <mailto:asoto at ibero-americano.org> &gt; He wrote: 

 Here's Alexis.If not our view at this time, we will be responsible for the consequences of this process. And worse, we have no right to claim. 

 Regards!! 

 Alberto Soto 

 Sent from my iPhone 

 22 sea. 2017, at 22:20, Alexis Anteliz <antelizalexis at gmail.com <mailto:antelizalexis at gmail.com> &gt; He wrote: 

 Thank you very much Alberto in ICANN58 I witnessed both times, I think it is fair and necessary to expand, improve and above all outline the role of both instances users face. It is imperative plans, programs, actions, results are known. Ie optimize the mechanisms to ensure effective and active participation of both instances. That may well be complementary and not necessarily mutually exclusive. Greetings Alexis Anteliz / fellowship 

 Estimates, as everyone knows, on 24 March 2017, public comments from the At-Large Review by the company ITEMS close. 

 There were two papers entries, the first draft and then ninety pages containing the sixteen recommendations.

 The opinion on the latter, it is obviously very limited unable to comment on the first draft. 

 Since the beginning many members of the WG, we made comments on the draft, which served to comment on the document containing the sixteen recommendations. 

 LACRALO will be inserted on these recommendations, as they came off the WG, and were informed promptly to the list. 

 As recommended that each ALS or ALS pour each member of your opinion of public comment, I tried a few minutes ago. Actually he had prepared personal comments on both documents. 

 My surprise when entering the link, which can only opinarse was through a form that &quot;limits&quot; opinion only comments, and restricted to a format for review comment for comment. 

 This means that the initial draft document, which I believe contains a number of shortcomings and misguided claims not directly investigated the facts, it is not feasible to be observed or pourable opinion on it. 

 We must remember that no public comment was restricted to a form, let alone with no possibility of review of the document that gave rise to that form. 

 Unfortunately too late, this period is already closed. I will try how to make a general comment, not particularly on each recommendation, because I think it is an important limiting our freedom of opinion. 

 The link in question:  https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-public-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf 

 Best regards 

 Alberto Soto 

 _______________________________________________ 

[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/605368e580.html
--]]