[lac-discuss-en] (no subject)
vanda at scartezini.org
vanda at scartezini.org
Mon Jul 3 19:59:54 UTC 2017
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
== utf-8? Q? _of_5_geogrnames = C3 = A1? _-_ New_pista_5? = =? Utf-8?
Desde: vanda at scartezini.org
Hello Alejandro.
If there is no consensus anywhere. There is a more radical position of some especially the GAC regarding domain names that can be used as geographic - questions arise:
A) how to control this, who for example would control the "geographical use" of a name as SPA - its location in SPA already deserves to be qualified as a geographical use and therefore not acceptable?
Subgroup 5 intends to discuss issues such as eta and propose a solution for each point
B) If one has the SPA mark to follow the same example, does the SPA community have the right to use its geographical denomination and would this be a violation of a rule, if such a rule would exist?
Etc.
The idea of \u200b\u200bcreating this group looks at solutions to these conflicts - for this reason the group must be reduced in order to reach a consensus. In principle within the cross community is thought to be a reasonable idea.
See what the GNSO specifically thinks and is asked to continue or not.
I follow in followup and I come back to you.
Hug.
To you ALEx, tale that we miss you - the lunch of the board with the former members was concentrated in memories for ICANN history. I think you have a lot to contribute. Do not forget to send your memories of the first times for the staff Melissa King <melissa.king at icann.org>
Thanks.
Vanda Scartezini
Contact Us
Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
Sorry for any typos.
HAPPY 2017!
From: "lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> " <lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> > On behalf of Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty at gmail.com<mailto:apisanty at gmail.com> >
Date: Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 16:16
To: "lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org> " <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org> >
Cc: LACRALO list <lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org> >
Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] follow-up procedures for 5 geographical names - new track 5
Vanda,
The same argument of having been on the topic since 2010 also invites some different considerations:
1. In recent times we have observed that in LACRALO there are different and even opposing views on ccTLDs and the control they must have on combinations of characters similar to those of their two- and three-character names; Consensus was not reached;
2.It would be appropriate for you to submit a report on the state of affairs in general and the points that remain unresolved;
3. there are some conflicts of interest among LACRALO organizations; For example, some organizations are also ccTLD operators, others have interventions in the generic names market, and in others, managers are both public officials and national representatives to the GAC;
4. In addition to proposing your own name, you should know at least two alternatives, in order to be able to analyze freely whether there is a need for continuity or rotation, and certainly for at least one representative to accompany you in these functions for the purpose of Develop the capacity to replace you later.
The same applies to other working groups and participants. The governance working group would make a great contribution by studying the maximum number of simultaneous positions that an individual representative can serve.
Best regards,
Alejandro Pisanty
2017-06-29 9:17 GMT-05: 00 <vanda at scartezini.org<mailto:vanda at scartezini.org> >:
[[--Translated text (en -> es) -]]
Subject: follow-up procedures for 5 geographical names - new clue 5
From: vanda at scartezini.org <mailto:vanda at scartezini.org>
Dear all - I do not know how to select each region so I am adding LACRALO ready to listen to your opinion.
I would like to put my name as a member of the "LAC region" as suggested by GNSO (not a formal member of ALAC)
Thanks for your consideration
This is a proposal by Jeff Neuman at the moment, and I think it is a divine idea, and this idea will make the groups much more efficient, more transparent and take the opinion of each region by ALAC, by governments ... for A process For track 5 - the cross of the geographical names of the community.
I am also in follow-up working group 1 on follow-up procedures.
I am jumping before hand only because after this since 2010 I have been very interested in the subject.
Thank you
Vanda Scartezini
Contact Us
AV.Paulista 1159, cj 1004
01311-200 - Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Landline: +55 11 3266.6253
Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
Sorry for any typos.
HAPPY 2017!
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/dad7884e47.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list