[lac-discuss-en] ? = Iso-8859-1 Posible_proceso_de_petici q = F3n_de _ = = iso-8859-1 una_RALO_para_sugerir_candidatos_adicionales_a_Dire q = q = iso-8859-1 ctor_de_la_Junta_Directiva_de_ICANN =?????????
Johnny Laureano - Asociación de Usuarios de Internet del at mm.icann.org
Johnny Laureano - Asociación de Usuarios de Internet del at mm.icann.org
Wed Jan 4 04:04:25 UTC 2017
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re:? = Iso-8859-1 Posible_proceso_de_petici q = F3n_de _ = = iso-8859-1 una_RALO_para_sugerir_candidatos_adicionales_a_Dire q = q = iso-8859-1 ctor_de_la_Junta_Directiva_de_ICANN =?????????
Desde: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Johnny_Laureano_-_Asociaci=F3n_de_Usuarios_de_Internet_del?=
+1.
Johnny L.
From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of carlos
dionisio aguirre
Posted on: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 7:31 pm
To: Jos Francisco Arce
CC: LACRALO Spanish
Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Possible petition process for a RALO
suggest additional candidates for Director of the Board of ICANN
Adiar agrees not add another applicant and determined and firmly support
the best candidate nominated by the BCEC, Mr. Leon Felipe Sanchez
Ambia.
Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
Adiar VicePte.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
-------- Original message --------
From: Jos Francisco Arce <josefranciscoarce at gmail.com>
Date: 03/01/17 18:00 (GMT-03: 00)
For:
Cc: LACRALO Spanish <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Possible petition process for a RALO
suggest additional candidates for Director of the Board of ICANN
Since Amtics we agree not to add anyone to the list msa and power
decide on the selection of the BCEC.
regards
Jos
Jan 3. 2017 16:53 "Natalia Enciso" <natalia.enciso at gmail.com> wrote:
I agree 100% support Len Felipe.
It is the best candidate that we can propose from our region. as the
DEMO with the excellent work being done.
I think it's the best our region support the selection made by the
BCEC, msan when one of the two candidates is our region. I do not believe
necessary to appoint others.
Regards,
Natalia
APADIT
On January 3, 2017, 14:22 Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob at gmail.com>
wrote:
Dear Ricardo,
Thank you very much for this comment.
Actually I agree with you. Lena my view deserves support
our region.I in my capacity as representative of ADI chile'm not
find more candidates.
Anyway, I think it is worth hearing the opinions of the
members of the region.
regards
Sent from my iPhone
The 01/03/2017, at 14:02, Ricardo Holmquist <rihogris at gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Humberto,
I think instead of looking for a candidate from another region, we must give our
enthusiastic support for Felipe Leon, who has been putting very high the
LACRALO name to his work in the different committees.
Greetings and a very happy aoa all
Sincerely
Ricardo Holmquist
ISOC Venezuela
On the sea, 3 Jan. 2017 at 10:30, Humberto Carrasco
<hcarrascob at gmail.com> wrote:
Dear,
As your
knowledge we are in a process for the At-Large community
participate in the election process since the number of the board 15
directive
ICANN board.
16
December 2016, the BCEC concluded its evaluation process of candidates and
announced that the following candidates pasarna the next stage of
process
of selection organized by the BMSPC. The candidates, in alphabetical order
surname, they are:
Alan Greenberg (Canada)
Amba Len Felipe Sanchez (Mexico)
In spite of
above, LACRALO has the option to incorporate more candidates for this
list.
Candidates that can be incorporated are:
Sebastien Bachollet (France)
William Michael Cunningham (United States)
I Dafalla (Libya)
Nigel Phair (Australia)
For
that any of these candidates can be incorporated you must have the
Voting of at least three of the five RALOS. Each RALO must vote
agreement
with their respective rules. Subsequently, the final selection of
candidates proceed to an election by members of the ALAC and
Presidents of the RALOs, which is the culmination of the process of selection of
Director of the Board of ICANN.
We emphasize that the
proposal for additional candidates is an option and not a
obligation. We can conclude that we do not want to add new candidates
list.
Product
of the above, a discussion process to run until the day 9 open
from
January 2016.The discussion is conducted in mailing list
LACRALO and
on the wiki in the following
< https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=63155261>
If there
consensus or majority opinions that we add a new candidate,
open a process of choice to run from January 12, 2017
until
on 18 January 2017. Otherwise, what we are promptly inform
the opinion of LACRALO.
regards
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3a5097bbbd.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list