[lac-discuss-en] Elections in May 2017

amedinagomez at gmail.com amedinagomez at gmail.com
Mon Feb 27 14:37:09 UTC 2017


[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: Elections in May 2017 
 Desde: amedinagomez at gmail.com

 totally agree with Alejandro and Alberto 


 The 27/2/2017 7:43, &quot;Humberto Carrasco&quot; <hcarrascob at gmail.com> wrote: 


 Dear, 


 I understand your questions. I will prepare answers to clarify 
 Doubts. 


 regards 


 Sent from my iPhone 


 The 27/02/2017, at 09:40, Alberto Soto <asoto at ibero-americano.org>
 wrote: 


 Huberto, I agree with Alexander. To complete the story, I think 
 it should be clarified when the elections should have taken place 
 reference, and the reasons why they were not realized. And also two 
 schedules with dates, from the dates due 
 done, considering alternative proposals. 


 Thanks and best regards 






 Alberto Soto














 lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-es- 
 bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
<lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> ] * * On behalf of Alejandro 
 Pisanty 
 * Sent: * Monday, February 27, 2017 12:34 AM 
 * To: * Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob at gmail.com>
 * CC: * lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 * Subject: * Re: [lac-discuss-en] Elections in May 2017 






 Humberto, 






 thank you very much for this message. 






 Before you can form an opinion is needed: 






 1. Explicitly mention dates and places of both ICANN meetings 
 Instead of referring to them by number. What goes from 60 to 63 a year, right? 






 2.Explicitly mention the duration of the extension of mandate 
 each means, and for whom. I repeat what I recently said: this is not 
 only an administrative matter, is a possible extension of mandate 
 it is also political. 






 3. Indicate what steps will continue the mediation process, in the same 
 message. For many reasons it would be preferable for the new election out 
 after we reach final agreements as a result of 
 mediation, but there are also reasons to not wait, especially if 
 the pending process is still long. 






 Thanks again. 






 Alejandro Pisanty 






 02/26/2017 21:12 GMT-06: 00 Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob at gmail.com> : 


 Dear members of LACRALO, 










 We would like to ask your opinion on the regional electoral calendar 
 LACRALO leaders. 






 As previously stated, it would be very useful for the program 
 Regional leadership LACRALO could be synchronized with the other 
 RALOs and the ALAC. Do allow the NomCom know what ALAC and RALO leaders 
 They would be in a leadership position chosen to take this into account when 
 NomCom select charges. It would also allow staff 
 At-Large support us more efficiently. 






 Then two options are presented. We believe that both options must 
 be voted by members of LACRALO. However, we would like to ask your 
 opinion on which prefers its reasons for selecting option: 






 * The first option is to hold elections in May with synchronization 
 ICANN achieved in full 60 * 






 In this case, the election of Regional Leadership should take place 
 during May and not in February. Elected leaders would take their positions 
 immediately after the close of the Annual General Meeting 2017 
 (ICANN 60). This would mean that the current President and the Secretary of 
 LACRALO remain in office until ICANN 60. This would allow 
 transition period if new leaders are chosen. Both leaders 
 current as newcomers are supported to travel to the Assembly 
 Annual general. 






 * The second option is to hold elections in May with full 
 ICANN synchronization achieved in 63 * 






 In this case, the election of Regional Leadership should take place 
 during May and not in February. LACRALO elected leaders take their 
 positions immediately in June 2017. The newly elected leaders 
 would take office on June 1, 2017 with a term of duration 
 end at the Annual General Meeting of 2018 at ICANN 63.Support for 
 travel to ICANN would begin in June 59 This is an interim solution 
 where full synchronization occurs at ICANN 63. 






 We would appreciate your opinion before 13 March 2017. After that, 
 we will open a voting process to decide which is the best choice for 
 our RALO. 






 Regards, 






 Humberto Carrasco - President 


 Maritza Aguero - Secretary 










 _______________________________________________ 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/15bdd349c8.html
--]]




More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list