[lac-discuss-en] ? = Utf-8 q reviewedSeptember = C3 = B3n_At-Large =
asoto at ibero-americano.org
asoto at ibero-americano.org
Mon Feb 6 02:00:32 UTC 2017
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re:? = Utf-8 q reviewedSeptember = C3 = B3n_At-Large =
Desde: asoto at ibero-americano.org
I suggest that WG is divided by articles or chapters. In a period to be determined, to hold a meeting for everyone to discuss. Also, if someone does not have time and are interested in a particular topic, analyze it on their own. At the scheduled meeting, you can participate with your comments.
Regards!!
Alberto\u2063
Sent from BlueMail
On Feb. 5. 2017 9:44 pm at 9:44 pm, Harold Arcos <harold.arcos at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ladies and I agree with some of the criticisms and
> Comments on the report submitted by ITEMS.
>
> I think this is a time-milestone in the history of the community
> At-Large of which we are part why I want to submit to
> your
> Consideration that we form a group of discussion that allows us
> share
> The opinions and criticism of the report exceeds asynchrony
> the
> Emails and monthly meetings that our Ralo
> only
> Are two (2) until the closing date for comment.
>
> The ability to introduce our individual contributions is open
> < https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2017-02-02-en>
> by
> Our part as Ralo would be very enriching regional discussion.
>
> Fraternal greetings
>
>
>
>
> 05.02.2017 1:16 GMT-04: 00 Alberto Soto <asoto at ibero-americano.org> :
>
>> My first thought on this paragraph.
>>
>> Dice "Rationale" but gives no foundation as a
> user
>> Individual perform a task better than ALS, and that many or
> many
>> Individual users will do better than a coordinated THIN.Neither
> have
>> A mere estimate of how many individual users will be incorporated,
> Or
>> That time unit have considered.
>>
>> An individual user can have the same possibility of coordinating
> A
>> Event with a university, or a government, like an ALS?
> Will
>> The same response from these institutions?
>>
>>'s Clear we have problems, but it seems that the new system
> what
>> Solutions, and even less to do if it becomes a bad to
>> Modification.
>>
>> There are many points to be alone on this paragraph yet. He
> report
>> Has more than 90 pages.
>>
>> None of these concerns I have raised to ITEMS, obtained
> Response.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>>
>>
>> Alberto
>>
>>
>>
>> * From: * lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:
>> Lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] * On behalf of
> * Antonio
>> Medina Gómez
>> * Sent: * Saturday, February 4, 2017 1:26 PM
>> * To: * Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob at gmail.com>
>> * CC: * LACRALO Spanish <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> * Subject: * Re: [lac-discuss-en] Review At-Large
>>
>>
>>
>> Humberto thank you very much for this timely contribution, which allows
> understanding
>> The new structure and especially the commitment and participation
> Active.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>>
>>
>> On 04/02/2017 11:15 "Humberto Carrasco" <hcarrascob at gmail.com>
> He wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> Aida given in nail with this new concept (structure).
>>
>>
>>
>> In relation to this new figure stated in the
>>
>> Report the following (my translation) (page 64 of the report).
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------
>>
>> * "Proposal of a" Membership Powered Model "*
>>
>>
>>
>> * Rationale *
>>
>>
>>
>> * One of the main conclusions of our review is that if
> well
>> The mission and the general function of At-Large are widely
> supported
>> Within the Community itself and ICANN, the organization
> At-Large
>> Has struggled to effectively engage users
> Final and
>> / Or ensure that more voices join end users
> the
>> Processes of ICANN policy. Instead, rightly
> Or without
>> It, the perception of a culture of law has come to dominate.
> The
>> End user input remains elusive. *
>>
>> * We recognize that the At-Large Community has made progress
> significant
>> In certain areas and our proposal seeks to build on this momentum
>> Positive. Taking into account the views of many people
> Within
>> At-Large, the broader ICANN system and beyond, we have formulated a
> model
>> Alternative organization. *
>>
>> * With the title "Empowered Membership Model" (EMM), the name is
>> Intended to send a clear signal to the rest of the community that At
> Large
>> It is ready to reform and move forward in the spirit of the transition
>> Back to IANA.The EMM has been designed to eliminate what we have
>> Identified as the main barriers to participation in the
>> System, and in order to strengthen the commitment of the end user
> within
>> At-Large. *
>>
>> -------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Addition is eliminated figure ALAC and the member set
> metric
>> To vote and be candidates (page 66 of the report):
>>
>>
>>
>> These are the proposals summarized in this topic:
>>
>>
>>
>> A.- A ALS (ALM calls the report because it includes users
>> Individual) in order to vote in an election of the leaders of ALAC
> /
>> THIN, must demonstrate active remote participation in a group
> work
>> ICANN for at least three months or provide reach and commitment
> In
>> Respective THIN (also suppose that at that time at least three
> Months).
>>
>>
>>
>> B.It is the staff who makes the calculation or carries this metric.
>>
>>
>>
>> C.- figure removed the ALAC member elected by the RALO and
> who
>> Participate in ALAC should be in our case the President and
>> Secretary who are elected by the region. The other ALAC member (5)
> They are
>> NOMCOM chosen. To be a candidate for leader of the RALO
> the
>> Respective ALS (ALM) must be active for at
>>
>> Least 12 months to be eligible.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I hope I have contributed to this little comments
> Contribution.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hugs
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The 03/02/2017, at 23:45, Aida Noblia <aidanoblia at gmail.com>
> He wrote:
>>
>> The issue mentioned Alberto is very important, the proposal
>> ITEM equipment involves a transformation in the current structure
> of
>> ALs participation through formally constituted and creating a
> new
>> Empowered individual membership concept (EMM), which means
> Is the
>> Solution to finding more effective participation in
> more
>> Quantity and quality.
>>
>>
>>
>> The lack of English translation worries us because difficult
> stage
>> It should be made known and discussed sufficiently in
> the
>> Community.
>>
>>
>>
>> Greetings to all
>>
>> Aida
>>
>>
>>
>> On February 3, 2017, 22:11, Antonio Medina Gomez <
>> Amedinagomez at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Alberto thank you very much.
>>
>> When will be available in Spanish?
>>
>>
>>
>> On 03/02/2017 19:26 "Alberto Soto" <asoto at ibero-americano.org>
> He wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear, as you know, is ongoing review of At-Large
>,
>> Scheduled to perform every five years in the ICANN Bylaws.
>>
>>
>>
>> The purpose of this is to solicit public comment
> Feedback
>> The community on the draft report issued by ITEMS
> International,
>> On the Review of At-Large. It began on January 31 and ends on
> 34
>> March 2017 23:59
>>
>> Here l link for comment: https://www.icann.org/public-
>> Comments / AtLarge-review-draft-report-01/02/2017-in
>>
>>
>>
>> While it is a draft that will be discussed, I ask you strongly
> That
>> Read, despite the extensive, and make comments. The blood count is
> too
>> Important to motivate our participation, and after reading,
> You will see
>> That possible consequence are much more important.
>>
>>
>>
>> My first observation is that given the importance it should have been
>> Translated at least three languages, since it is only in English.
>> I do not particularly like this lack of diversity, when ICANN
> is
>> Is working hard to be applied.
>>
>>
>>
>> I was part of the working group and have already dumped there my
> Reviews
>> Which are many.
>>
>>
>>
>> One is a model change is proposed, important
> with
>> Consequences on our functionality, without having informed
> Despite
>> It has been requested. And that influence the functionality
> Compliance
>> Our mission. Another is the presentation of statistics,
> mi
>> No valid judgment.
>>
>>
>>
>> We have agreed that we have problems, but are reviewable and
> May
>> Solved.
>>
>>
>>
>> I to be with little access (or no access) Internet until the day
> 14
>> February.
>>
>>
>>
>> I really urge you to make a sacrifice, to read and comment.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>>
>>
>> Alberto Soto
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Lac-discuss-en mailing list
>>
>> lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.lacralo.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Lac-discuss-en mailing list
>>
>> lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.lacralo.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>>
>> Aida Noblia
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Lac-discuss-en mailing list
>>
>> lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.lacralo.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lac-discuss-en mailing list
>> lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>>
>> http://www.lacralo.org
>>
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/8fdc92303b.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list