[lac-discuss-en] q = utf-8 Algunos_temas_ante_el_proceso_de_Trans = = utf-8 b aWNpw7Nu =????????

Fri Sep 23 21:29:42 UTC 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: q = utf-8 Algunos_temas_ante_el_proceso_de_Trans = = utf-8 b aWNpw7Nu =???????? 
 Desde: vanda at scartezini.org

 Excelent. Now we can comemorar congresso proque the US have approved the transition !!! 

 Vanda Scartezini 
 Polo Consultores Associados 
 Av. Paulista 1159, 1004 cj 
 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil 
 Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 
 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 
 Sorry for any typos. 

 From: &quot;lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org&quot; <lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> On Behalf of &quot;cveraq at gmail.com&quot; <cveraq at gmail.com>
 Date: Friday, September 23, 2016 at 5:57 PM 
 To: Harold Arcos <harold.arcos at gmail.com> &quot;Lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org&quot; <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
 Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Some issues before the transition process 

 Excellent summary. Executive and to the point. 

 thanks Harold 

 Carlos Vera 
 ISOC Ecuador 

 Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. 
 From: Harold Arcos 
 Posted: Thursday, September 22, 2016 9:58 
 To: LACRALO 
 Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Some issues before the transition process 

 Ladies and gentlemen region 

 In this way I share a summary that I prepared for the transition associated with IANA and which they are ongoing within the sub-working issues. 

 This process we are experiencing is recent after milestone representing the presentation of the proposal to the US government. 

 Some of these groups have only made a single meeting, others are discussing the guiding principle of the group. That is, it is still good time to sit up and share experience as a region to address all these issues together. Some structural issues of the corporation (but no less important) and others of interest to users.

 I share some links that allow us to review firsthand the initial documents of the issues under discussion. 

 HUMAN RIGHTS 

 Human Rights:  https://community.icann.org/x/kBWOAw 

 Within this working group some members propose extending the scope of ICANN in human rights. options as proposed: work an implementation framework, while others are more inclined to work a framework of interpretation. As we will assume this issue is very delicate because ICANN is a technical organization by definition makes efforts not to get involved in a legal discussion that must take providers and users, but it is an obvious fact that the corporation has a leading role on the structure of the Internet. 

 JURISDICTION 

 jurisdiction:  https://community.icann.org/x/khWOAw 

 One of the first discussions focused on the word Jurisdiction not be taken as the geographical area where ICANN operates.At this point he reached a first discussion and admitted that there would be consensus a priori. This topic has been debated long ago since I was CEO Fadi. Within this working group some members are inclined to move ICANN legal headquarters to Switzerland or Geneva. Others are inclined to keep her in California. 

 ODBUSMAN 

 Ombudsman:  https://community.icann.org/x/lhWOAw 

 This subgroup works the role of Odbusman within the new configuration of the ICANN structure. 

 COOPERATIVE PARTICIPATION PROCESS. 

 CEP (Cooperative Engagement processs and Independent Review processs). 

 CEP:  https://community.icann.org/x/nBWOAw 

 This group will seek to work on a proposed process in which to take assume an alternative to resolve cases before going to an IRP. This group has not met yet. 

 RESPONSIBILITIES OF ORGANIZATIONS SUPPORT (SO) and advisory committees (AC)

 SO / AC Accountability:  https://community.icann.org/x/lBWOAw 

 This group deals with issues involving everyone. For example in the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) you have a discussion on the definition and scope of their participation after the transition. issues such as the Organization Generic Names Support (GNSO) is a complex structure and process internal decision-making is complex too, so that's a challenge to solve before taking the lead role post transition are discussed. Within the public and private sectors are reviewed how the participants act within the SO / AC and whether they would be effective spokesmen for the interests we represent. Within the Community Assumed Powers, At-large also has the challenge of defining how At-Large will address the participation of representatives. 

 FINAL USUSARIOS 

 At-large is discussed if the end user has responsibilities and how to report them according to a practice of transparency for all, others think they have no obligation to report.

 Does composiciohn Icann should be balanced? They are also questions that are generated. 

 Recommendation 7 and 13 

 https://community.icann.org/display/als2/ATLAS+II+Recommendation+7 

 a periodic review of multi-stakeholder model arises. This proposal does not seem to occur during the working path 2 (WS2) 

 From the CCWG of Responsibility you are trying to define which areas should be controlled by Icann. 

 https://community.icann.org/display/als2/ATLAS+II+Recommendation+13 

 During the Board will WS2 who receives this recommendation. 

 Icann should study and seek to ensure the general representation so that there is a balance of representation from all parties who make up the Icann. 

 Some questions arise: What are the criteria for considering that there is a representation of stakeholders.? In the sub group it is not known if still being treated that perspective. 

 CHALLENGES AHEAD 

 In this subgroup scenarios of how the Icann be structured they arise? How redesign ICANN is it part of this agenda? It is one of the questions that are generated to assume the post transition period. Some participants question whether the GNSO could deal with the public interest arise? In theory GNSO helps the Board to make decisions within GNSO but if you do not get concrete recommendations then you might think In a reconfiguration of GNSO? 

 RESPONSIBILITY OF STAFF 

 Staff Accountability:  https://community.icann.org/x/mhWOAw 

 Working group that will review staff responsibilities of Staff. The group has met once and are working on a document that was distributed through google docs. 

 TRANSPARENCY 

 Transparency:  https://community.icann.org/x/mBWOAw 

 There has been talk of disclosure of documents among other actions you can take as good practices. 

 Receive a hug 

 Harold 

[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/f3bc197fdb.html
--]]