[lac-discuss-en] ??????? Q = iso-8859-1 F3n Plan_estrat = E9gico_de_Extensi = = = iso-8859-1 _de_LACRALO q _ / _ LACRALO_Outreach_strategic_plan =

[asoto at ibero-americano.org]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re:??????? Q = iso-8859-1 F3n Plan_estrat = E9gico_de_Extensi = = = iso-8859-1 _de_LACRALO q _ / _ LACRALO_Outreach_strategic_plan = 
 Desde: asoto at ibero-americano.org

 Thanks for the reply. Just I do not understand why a decision that must be achieved by consensus within LACRALO must intervene outsider. 
 regards 
 Alberto Soto 


 Sent from my ASUS 


 -------- Original message -------- 
 From: Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob at gmail.com>
 Posted: Mon, October 10, 2016 23:36:37 -0300 
 To: Alberto Soto <asoto at ibero-americano.org>
 Cc: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Strategic Plan LACRALO Extension / Outreach LACRALO strategic plan
 > Dear Alberto, 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > If you read in detail the document you will see that states the following: 
 > 
 > 
 > &quot;The leadership of LACRALO, in coordination with members of LACRALO Subcommittee Extension and Relationship, may appoint members of the region function as links, both with respect to the parties mentioned above, as on individuals or organizations that are possible candidates for At-large. &quot; 
 > 
 > 
 > The consensus involving some members of the Subcommittee LACRALO Extension and Relationship, Vice President of Stakeholder Engagement and the President and Secretary of LACRALO. 
 > 
 > Unfortunately, we could not delay further the terms of the plan. In any case, were taken into account your contributions. 
 > 
 > 
 > As point, a group discussion for another year strategic plan was formed [ERROR: Sentence too long to translate (5118&gt; 1800 bytes)].Just an observation: 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > - &quot;... Either through leadership LACRALO or through designated as liaison members).&quot;. Please clarify this. Clearly LARALO leadership should first consult our region to achieve consensus. And besides, qauién designates the &quot;designated as liaison members&quot;? 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > This is the first quick observation. 
 > 
 > Best regards 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > Alberto Soto 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of Humberto Carrasco 
 > Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 9:44 pm 
 > To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 > Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Strategic Plan LACRALO Extension / Outreach LACRALO strategic plan 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > Dear, 
 > 
 > After a heated debate and negotiations, it has reached a consensus on the Strategic Plan Extension LACRALO 2016/2017.They participated in this consensus LACRALO members of the Subcommittee on Extension and Relationship, Vice President of Stakeholder Engagement and the President and Secretary of LACRALO. 
 > 
 > They have tried to take into account the views of all those who have spoken here in recent weeks. As consensus they have been incorporated suggestions from all those who have participated. However, we also understand that not all approaches have been taken. Nevertheless, we hope that this plan candidate obtains at least the minimum requirements that our region needs. The current plan will be found at this link: 
 > 
 > 
 >  https://community.icann.org/display/croppfy17/LACRALO+Outreach+Strategic+Plan+DRAFT 
 > 
 > Greetings 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >  
 > 
 > Avast antivirus software scanned this email for viruses. 
 > www.avast.com 
 > 
 > 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/fc899f81b3.html
--]]