[lac-discuss-en] ????? Q = windows-1252 Resoluciones_del_Board_ = 7C_Reun = = windows-1252 q i = F3n_Regular_15_mayo_2016 =?

vanda at scartezini.org vanda at scartezini.org
Wed May 18 20:51:00 UTC 2016


[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re:????? Q = windows-1252 Resoluciones_del_Board_ = 7C_Reun = = windows-1252 q i = F3n_Regular_15_mayo_2016 =? 
 from: vanda at scartezini.org

 Alberto perfect so I think there need to re start all 


 Vanda Scartezini 
 Sent from my iPhone 
 Sorry for typos 


 On 18 mai 2016, at 17:37, Alberto Soto <asoto at ibero-americano.org<mailto:asoto at ibero-americano.org> &gt; Wrote: 


 Vanda, besides these movement outside a Regin, cause other problems. I can cite the NextGen program, for example, and another as regional organizations who are waiting for the meeting of ICANN to participate and develop consecutive events, and for a long time can not do. 
 I understand the suspension by the subject of the virus, because had health insurance that does not cover passengers who enter passaged with that problem. But they have to be revisions. 


 Best regards 
 Alberto soto


 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of Vanda Scartezini 
 Posted on: Wednesdays, May 18, 2016 4:54 pm 
 To: Harold Arcos <harold.arcos at gmail.com<mailto:harold.arcos at gmail.com> &gt;; LACRALO <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org> &gt; 
 Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Board Resolutions | Regular meeting May 15, 2016 
 Importance: High 


 Thank you for doing Harold suddenly. 
 I remind colleagues that there was another modification of premises for the last event of ICANN this year. As it will be in India, Hyderabad in sustitucina Puerto Rico. 
 Therefore leave Amricas scene this year. 
 In my view, the whole process of rotation where the meetings are allocated should be reviewed; because besides the jump of the Americas this year, there are also the cuestin model B, which in principle should focar in outreach + ICANN policies, and was thought to occur in small countries I and developing countries.
 We see this year Panam was replaced by Finland, because of last minute, although small is very far from being a developing country, it loses the opportunity to make as effective in another local outreach in development. 
 Hugs to all 


 Vanda Scartezini 
 Polo Consultores Associados 
 Av. Paulista 1159 # 1004 
 01311-200 Sao Paulo / SP Brazil 
 Phone: + 55 11 3266-6253 
 Mobile: + 55 11 98181-1464 


 from: <lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> &gt; On Behalf of Harold Arcos <harold.arcos at gmail.com<mailto:harold.arcos at gmail.com> &gt; 
 Date: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at 2:22 PM 
 To: LACRALO <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org> &gt; 
 Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Board Resolutions | Regular meeting May 15, 2016 


 Ladies and 
 Reenvo the information shared by Abdul Rinalia on the resolutions reached at the recent Board meeting on 15 May.


 Some key aspects: 
 * Interesting aspects such as improving openness and transparency 
 * Comments Pblico on the proposed revision of Conduct on the ICANN Meetings. 
 * Creation of a Working Group on Internet Governance Board (including Rinalia) 
 * Approval of budgets AC / SO as was presented by the Staff. 


 Issues in which we engage and inform our ALSs to build together the best possible ICANN for the times ahead amid the transition process. 


 regards 


 Harold Arcos 
 Member ALAC - LACRALO 
 President Internauta Venezuela 
 @InternautaVe &lt;  https://twitter.com/internautave> 
 @hwarcos &lt;  https://twitter.com/hwarcos> 
 skp: harcos0912 
 +58 4129982820 
 www.internauta.org.ve <http://www.internauta.org.ve>






 Approved Board Resolutions | Regular Meeting of the ICANNBoard 


 15 May 2016 
 1. Consent Agenda: &lt;  https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#1> 
 1. Approval of Board Meeting Minutes &lt;  https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#1.a> 
 2.Security &amp; Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) Appointment &lt;  https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#1.b> 
 Rationale for Resolution 2016.05.15.02 &lt;  https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#1.b.rationale> 
 3. GNSO gTLD Registries Stakeholder Group Charter Amendments (2016) &lt;  https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#1.c> 
 Rationale for Resolution 2016.05.15.03 &lt;  https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#1.c.rationale> 
 4. Conduct at ICANN Meetings &lt;  https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#1.d> 
 Rationale for Resolutions 2016.05.15.04 2016.05.15.05 &lt;  https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#1.d.rationale> 
 5. Board Working Group on Internet Governance (BWG-IG) &lt;  https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#1.e> 
 2. Main Agenda: &lt;  https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2> 
 1. Consideration of GNSO Policy Recommendations Concerning the Accreditation of Privacy and Proxy Services &lt;  https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2.a> 
 Rationale for Resolutions 2016.05.15.07 2016.05.15.08 &lt;  https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2.a.rationale> 
 2. Report re: .Hotel &lt;  https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2.b> 
 3. SO / AC FY17 Budget Requests Additional Approval &lt;  https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2.c> 
 Rationale for Resolution 2016.05.15.09 &lt;  https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2.c.rationale> 
 4. October 2016 ICANN Meeting Venue Contracting &lt;  https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2.d> 
 Rationale for Resolutions 2016.05.15.10 2016.05.15.11 &lt;  https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2.d.rationale> 
 5. IANA Stewardship Transition USG FY16 Additional Expenses and Funding &lt;  https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2.e> 
 Rationale for Resolution 2016.05.15.12 &lt;  https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2.e.rationale> 
 6. AOB &lt;  https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2.f> 
 1. Enhancing Openness and Transparency Board Deliberations &lt;  https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2.f.i> 
 Rationale for Resolution 2016.05.15.13 2016.05.15.14 &lt;  https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2.f.i.rationale> 
 1. Executive Session CONFIDENTIAL &lt;  https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#3> 


 1. AOB 
 1. Enhancing Openness and Transparency Board Deliberations 


 Whereas, the Board Believes That Increased providing access to Board Deliberations is Important, and That Increased openness is an Important Means of working Toward That goal. 


 Whereas, the ICANN Board at its Amsterdam workshop Discussed how to Improve ITS Functioning and Agreed That Enhancing the visibility into the Board Deliberations and decision-making Processes was an Important part of becoming more accountable and more transparent. 


 Whereas, the Board NOTED the call from the community for openness and transparency Increased.


 Whereas, the Board Believes That a positive first step towards Increased openness is publicly posting transcripts and / or recordings of Its deliberative sessions to the extent That Such information is not subject dialogue or to privilege or confidentiality restrictions. 


 Resolved (2016.05.15.13), the Board directs the President and CEO, His or designee (s) to Work With the Board to Develop to proposed plan for the publication of transcripts and / or recordings of Board deliberative sessions, with Such plan to include an assessment of possible resources costs and tax impact, and draft Processes to: (i) Ensure the accuracy of the transcript; and (ii) for redaction of portions of the transcript That Should be maintained as confidential or privileged. 


 Resolved (2016.05.15.14), the Board Expects to Evaluate the plan in Helsinki, and if satisfactory to begin testing of the Proposed Processes Relating to publication of transcripts and / or recordings of the Board's deliberative sessions as soon as practicable after Helsinki. 


 Rationale for Resolution 2016.05.15.13 2016.05.15.14


 In support of the continued call for visibility into Deliberations and Processes Board, the Board has determined to make available to transcripts or recordings, where appropriate`, of the Board's deliberative sessions. This effort to Enhance openness is likely to support the ICANN community Also in Enhancing ICANN's accountability, as it will reduce questions of how and why the Board Reaches ITS decisions. This decision supports ICANN's Past Directly previous Efforts and the continued goal of operating as openly and transparently in Its decision-making. ICANN también está acting consistently With the ICANN's Bylaws, as Set Out in Article III, section 1 of the ICANN Bylaws, that, &quot;ICANN and Its constituent bodies Shall operate to the maximum extent feasible in an open and transparent manner and consistent With Procedures designed to Ensure fairness. &quot; (ICANN Bylaws at  https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en  - III &lt;  https://www.icann.org/reso
 urces/pages/governance/bylaws-en#III>.) 


 There will be issues before the Board for confidentiality Which is still required, and That May require redaction of parts or withholding of full transcripts, and it is Important That the community and the Board Understand how decisions will be taken Those.To that end, the Board is directing the development of a plan, Which would include Proposed Processes by Which Those redaction decisions for confidentiality and privilege are to be made. That plan Should be developed as soon as practicable, and Should be ready for Board consideration During ICANN56 in Helsinki. 


 This decision will not Have any impact on the security, stability or resiliency of the DNS. Implementation of decision esta May Involve Increased costs, treats including, risk and tax impact for ICANN. 


 This is an administrative function for organizational Which public comment is not required, but May be useful Such input at a later point Depending upon the plan. 


 This email has-been protected by YAC (Yet Another Cleaner) www.yac.mx <http://www.yac.mx?source=email>



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/69c3c42731.html
--]]




More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list