[lac-discuss-en] Outreach and Engagement SC

[asoto at ibero-americano.org]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: Outreach and Engagement SC 
 From: asoto at ibero-americano.org

 Dear Sergio, there is nothing to do. I informed our region an external working group to LACRALO is taking decisions without any legal basis, and therefore everything you do has no value. Remember that we are independent. 
 Best regards 
 Alberto Soto 


 Sent from my ASUS 


 -------- Original message -------- 
 From: Sergio Salinas Porto <presidencia at internauta.org.ar>
 Posted: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:24:33 -0300 
 To: Alberto Soto <asoto at ibero-americano.org>
 Cc: LACRALO <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
 Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Outreach and Engagement SC 
 > Dear Alberto, I agree with what you're proposing and what worries me also doing our friend Dev in that group, we're going to do to remedy this [ERROR: Sentence too long to translate (2361&gt; 1800 bytes)]?
 > 
 > Before that, one of our ALAC Members consulted me because he received a task from Dev: take care of a particular country to try to capture an organization for subsequent certification as ALS. It seemed odd and so I consulted. 
 > 
 > This is the second time I make this comment. We generated and tested a similar plan, but added an order of countries, based on the rate of Internet penetration. That is, work with inclusive, starting with the countries with the lowest rates and so we did. 
 > 
 > With the Plan he joined the current ALS Haiti, the country with the lowest rate in our region. And ISOC Dominican Republic. 
 > 
 > The Strategic Plan of LACRALO generated by the Outreach and Engagement SC, did not follow the normal procedure for any plan to be adopted by consensus. And this does not mean that it is correct, but the procedure is incorrect.
 > 
 > In addition: &quot;The goal of the ALAC Subcommittee on Outreach and commitment is to develop a strategy both At-Large to reach new potential members of the community outreach and engage new and existing members. Once this strategy is developed, it will work with its members, the ALAC and RALO to ensure the strategy is implemented successfully. &quot; 
 > 
 > The strategy is developed, but has not fulfilled the last paragraph: work with our RALO. 
 > 
 > The same subcommittee is conducting the implementation, which is not applicable, must do our Region. 
 > 
 > At some point assign CROPP travel by continuing the implementation program. This procedure is incorrect, it is to be treated in our region. ALS first, then approved by LACRALO, then the Commission CROPP then GSE program. 
 > 
 > The fact that the subcommittee has several members of LACRALO; and anyone can enroll at any time, it does not provide authority for the implementation of program implementation, which must be made within LACRALO.
 > 
 > I ask Dev to make the appropriate changes, and start working in coordination with the leadership of LACRALO. 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > Best Regards 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > Alberto Soto 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > This email has-been protected by YAC (Yet Another Cleaner) www.yac.mx 
 > 
 >  This email was sent from a computer free of viruses and protected by Avast. 
 > Www.avast.com 
 > 
 > This email has-been protected by YAC (Yet Another Cleaner) www.yac.mx 
 > 
 > 
 > _______________________________________________ 
 > Lac-discuss-en mailing list 
 > Lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 >  https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es 
 > 
 > Http://www.lacralo.org 
 > 
 > 
 > 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3d7b81966f.html
--]]