[lac-discuss-en] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Initial Report on Data & Metrics for Policy Making
asoto at ibero-americano.org
asoto at ibero-americano.org
Tue Sep 8 17:51:19 UTC 2015
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Initial Report on Data & Metrics for Policy Making
From: asoto at ibero-americano.org
Fatima, has not followed any procedure. What makes Vanda is consulted on several occasions and has given its position in advance.
You always said that the opinion of Member ALAC is individual and not necessarily be representative of the region.
All I ask is that if they want to see, do more advance to allow time for us to achieve consensus, and if we do not agree with the opinion of the ALAC Member, our position can be noted.
From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of Fatima Cambronero
Posted on: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 2:36 pm
To: Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty at gmail.com>
CC: LACRALO list <lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org> ; lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org; Vanda Scartezini <vanda at etges.com.br>
Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] [ALAC-Announce] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Initial Report on Data & Metrics for Policy Making
President, Secretary of LACRALO,
Asked whether any procedure has been followed for a position, based on the consensus of LACRALO to tell us to ALAC representatives to cast the votes on this issue.
Otherwise, by the time we just have individual opinions of ALS representatives who have spoken through this mailing list.
I appreciate this matter promptly report because there is little time for closing the voting period on this subject.
On Tuesday, September 8, 2015, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty at gmail.com <mailto:apisanty at gmail.com> > He wrote:
In a previous message - which apparently went to an experimental list operated by Dev - I expressed my view that the pilots proposed to change the system of using data to develop policies observers At formally incorporated Large. Alan Greenberg explained me off lists that an agreement on this is not necessary because the processes are carried out openly.
I therefore agree that votes in favor, and I ask that is in the memory of the process that LACRALO must be attentive to the pilot and invite participation in this desirable considering that if board members and representatives ALAC they can not do the community must ensure that someone else do it and report.
I have sent this before, but Have not hear anything from your side. I believe we are less Relevant waste time debating issues and policy Been issues are not our priority.
Any way, I have to vote on esta till the end of tomorrow. If someone can take a look pelase or share your views, I appreciate.
Thank you in advance.
Polo Consultores Associados
Av. Paulista 1159, 1004 cj
01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
Sorry for any typos.
Reply-To: ICANN Staff
Date: Friday, September 4, 2015 at 19:59
Subject: [ALAC-Announce] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Initial Report on Data & Metrics for Policy Making
This is to let you know That the ALAC Statement on the Initial Report on Data < https://community.icann.org/x/34tCAw>
To read the Final Statement, Please visit: https://community.icann.org/x/34tCAw.
Please note That the ALAC ratification vote will start on 04 September 2015 22:59 UTC and end on 09 September 2015 23:59 UTC.
Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew
ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann < https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> AtLarge < https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>
Twitter: @ < https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> ICANNAtLarge < https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>
[[--Original text (es)
More information about the lac-discuss-en