[lac-discuss-en] Comments on Second Proposal CCWG Accountability
asoto at ibero-americano.org
asoto at ibero-americano.org
Wed Sep 2 04:45:13 UTC 2015
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Comments on Second Proposal CCWG Accountability
From: asoto at ibero-americano.org
Commentary published in the wiki:
https://community.icann.org/display/LACRALO/LACRALO+Page+on+At-Large+Briefin
g + + on + 2nd + CCWG-Draft Proposal Accountability +
Best regards
Alberto Soto
At the meeting on Tuesday 01/09/2015 At Large Ad-hoc WG on IANA
Transition & ICANN Accountability, among other issues tratel Community
Mechanism as a Sole Designator (MRDC). The mail below, although it was sent
Accountability to CCWG by Alan attulo staff, reflects the position of
several in this group.
"To: CCWG Accountability <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
Subject: Perhaps a variation ...
The At-Large group advising on Accountability and IANA matters met today (as
we Have Been twice weekly for the last while). It is becoming increasingly
That the CMSM model clearer still have a lot of rough edges That need to be
finalized prior to putting forward our proposal as the accountability part
of the IANA transition, and my recollection Is That We were in Buenos Aires
Told in no uncertain terms That the proposal needed to be complete and fully
implementable prior to Being accepted by the NTIA and IF NECESSARY,
Congress. That I fear the current plan That will not meet target.
So, Although I am hesitant to Suggest we switch gears At this time, I am not
We have we sure real alternative if we want to effect the transition.
The At-Large group was very supportive of Considering a variation of what we
now have, Specifically, a Community Mechanism as a Sole Designator (MRDC).
Following the Buenos Aires meeting, and prior to the CMSM model Being
Introduced, many in the CCWG Were willing to Consider the Empowered
Designator model, and this is to use the simplified variant That CMSX
With the structure but lighter-weight designator Which mechanism will be
Significantly Easier to set-up. Also it addresses some of the Concerns With
Membership moving to a model for ICANN.
I am sending this on my own, but With the knowledge That the concept had a
lot of support in my community.
Alan "
---
Avast antivirus software has analyzed this e-mail for viruses.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/12b7d82f1c.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list