[lac-discuss-en] VOTE RESULTS: LACRALO Vote on Motion Proposed by Alejandro Pisanty / LACRALO vote on the motion proposed by Alejandro Pisanty

Sun Oct 18 15:15:20 UTC 2015

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: VOTE RESULTS: LACRALO Vote on Motion Proposed by Alejandro Pisanty / LACRALO vote on the motion proposed by Alejandro Pisanty 
 From: apisanty at gmail.com

 Hi, 

 Does not Reflect the subject motion. This is not a vote on a motion I 
 Proposed. In fact energically I disassociate myself from the motion as 
 proven by my vote Against It. 

 It is remarkable Also That the person (s) who for no confidence did Moved 
 not vote. 

 The subject does not reflect the motion. This vote does not refer to a motion I 
 It has encouraged. In fact I strongly disassociate the motion as 
 test my vote. 

 It is also notable that (s) person (s9 prompted (aron) the motion of 
 Censorship did not vote. 

 Alejandro Pisanty 

 Alejandro Pisanty 

 18/10/2015 10:08 GMT-05: 00 ICANN At-Large Staff <staff at atlarge.icann.org> : 

> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Please be so kind to note that the First Vote with regard to the Motion of
> No Confidence proposed by Carlton Samuels is now completed. The
> voting process was governed by rules *12, 19 and 20 of LACRALO's RoP*.
> Concerning the proposed resolution, the following question was asked in the
> First Vote:
>
>
>
> ***
>
> *QUESTION:* Do you believe that LACRALO is competent to vote a motion of
> no confidence?
>
> 1. Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward.
>
> 2. No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored.
>
>
>
> Of the total of 47 ALSs in this voting process, 28 ALSs voted (equivalent
> to 58,89% of total weight). The minimum quorum requirement was 24 ALSs.
>
>
>
> Option YES =7 votes equivalent to 13.61% of total weight.
>
>
>
> Option NO = 21 votes equivalent to 45.28% of total weight.
>
>
>
> Abstentions to vote = 19 votes equivalent to 41.11% of total weight.
>
>
>
> According to rule 12.2, At Large Structures abstaining from voting shall
> be regarded as having not voted.
>
>
>
> As at Poll close: Friday 16 October 2015 23:00 UTC
> Number of voters: 28Â· Group size: 47 Â· Percentage voted: 58.89 of total
> weight
>
> Ranked by votes
>
> *Rank*
>
> *Options*
>
> *Weighted Votes*
>
> *%*
>
> *Votes*
>
> *%*
>
> *Voters*
>
> 1
>
> No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored / No, the mociÃ³n de
> censura debe ser ignorada
>
> 4,531.0000
>
> 76.87
>
> 21
>
> 75.00
>
> Jose Olvidio Salgueiro(w167), Adrian Carballo(w56), MÃ³nica Abalo
> Laforgia(w56), Javier Eduardo Chandia Rojas(w250), Dr. Aislan Vargas
> Basilio(w125), Sergio Walter Salinas Porto(w56), Cristian Casas(w56),
> Alberto Soto(w56), Jose Luis Barzallo(w125), Gilberto Lara(w500), Ana Maria
> Moreno(w167), Diego Acosta Bastidas(w125), Aida Noblia(w500), Humberto
> Carrasco(w250), Alejandro Pisanty(w500), Luis Sergio Valle Sejas(w500),
> Alyne Andrade(w125), Mario Aleman(w500), Harold Arcos(w167), Vanda
> Scartezini(w125), Sylvia Herlein Leite(w125)
>
> 2
>
> Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward / Si, la mociÃ³n de
> censura debe proceder
>
> 1,363.0000
>
> 23.13
>
> 7
>
> 25.00
>
> Antonio Medina Gomez(w167), Juan Manuel Rojas P(w167), Fatima
> Cambronero(w56), Jose Arce(w56), Maricarmen Sequera Buzarquis(w250),
> Ricardo Holmquist(w167), Lia Patricia Hernandez Perez(w500)
>
>
>
> ***
>
>
>
> As per instruction published on the Next Steps regarding the Motion of No
> Confidence <https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw>, the proposed amendment
> and Mr. Samuels' motion of no confidence must be ignored.
>
>
>
> You may check the vote result independently under:
> <https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q>
> https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q
>
>
>
> == ES ==
>
>
>
> Hola a todos,
>
>
>
> Por favor notar que el primer voto sobre la mociÃ³n de censura propuesta
> por el Sr. Carlton Samuels se ha completado. El proceso de voto estarÃ¡
> gobernado por las reglas *12, 19, y 20* *de las Reglas de Procedimiento
> de LACRALO*. Con relaciÃ³n a la resoluciÃ³n propuesta, la siguiente  es la
> pregunta del Primer voto:
>
>
>
> ***
>
> *PREGUNTA*: Â¿Usted cree que LACRALO tiene competencia  para votar la
> mociÃ³n de censura?
>
> 1. Si, la  mociÃ³n de censura debe proceder.
>
> 2. No, the mociÃ³n de censura debe ser ignorada.
>
>
>
> Del total de 47 ALSes en este  proceso de votaciÃ³n, 28 ALSes votaron
> (equivalente al 58,89% del peso total). El mÃnimo quorum requerido es 24
> ALses.
>
>
>
> OpciÃ³n SI - 7 Votos equivalentes al 13,61% del peso total.
>
>
>
> OpciÃ³n NO - 21 Votos equivalentes al 45,28% del peso total.
>
>
>
> Abstenciones al votar = 19 votos equivalentes al 41,11 % del peso total.
>
>
>
> De acuerdo a la regla 12.2, las estructuras que se abstengan de votar se
> consideraran como si no hubieran votado.
>
>
>
> Al momento de cerrar la votaciÃ³n: Viernes 16 de Octubre 2015, 23 UTC.
>
> NÃºmero de votos: 28. TamaÃ±o del grupo: 47. Porcentaje votado: 58.89 del
> peso total
>
> PosiciÃ³n Opciones Votos
>
> *PosiciÃ³n *
>
> *Opciones*
>
> *Votos tabuladas*
>
> *%*
>
> *Votos*
>
> *%*
>
> *Votantes*
>
> 1
>
> No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored / No, the mociÃ³n de
> censura debe ser ignorada
>
> 4,531.0000
>
> 76.87
>
> 21
>
> 75.00
>
> Jose Olvidio Salgueiro(w167), Adrian Carballo(w56), MÃ³nica Abalo
> Laforgia(w56), Javier Eduardo Chandia Rojas(w250), Dr. Aislan Vargas
> Basilio(w125), Sergio Walter Salinas Porto(w56), Cristian Casas(w56),
> Alberto Soto(w56), Jose Luis Barzallo(w125), Gilberto Lara(w500), Ana Maria
> Moreno(w167), Diego Acosta Bastidas(w125), Aida Noblia(w500), Humberto
> Carrasco(w250), Alejandro Pisanty(w500), Luis Sergio Valle Sejas(w500),
> Alyne Andrade(w125), Mario Aleman(w500), Harold Arcos(w167), Vanda
> Scartezini(w125), Sylvia Herlein Leite(w125)
>
> 2
>
> Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward / Si, la mociÃ³n de
> censura debe proceder
>
> 1,363.0000
>
> 23.13
>
> 7
>
> 25.00
>
> Antonio Medina Gomez(w167), Juan Manuel Rojas P(w167), Fatima
> Cambronero(w56), Jose Arce(w56), Maricarmen Sequera Buzarquis(w250),
> Ricardo Holmquist(w167), Lia Patricia Hernandez Perez(w500)
>
>
>
> ***
>
> De acuerdo  a las instrucciones publicadas en los Siguientes pasos acerca
> de la mociÃ³n de censura <https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw>, la
> enmienda propuesta y la mociÃ³n de censura del Sr. Samuels serÃ¡ ignorada.
>
>
>
> Puede revisar los resultados independientemente bajo:
> <https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q>
> https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie
> Peregrine and Terri Agnew
>
> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
>
> E-mail:  <staff at atlarge.icann.org>staff at atlarge.icann.org
>
> Facebook:  <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>www.facebook.com/icann
> atlarge <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>
>
> Twitter: @ <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge
> <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-es mailing list
> lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>
> http://www.lacralo.org
>

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty 
 UNAM Faculty of Chemistry 
 3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico 
 + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD 
 SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475 
 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com 
 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty 
 UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, 
 http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty 
 ---- &gt;&gt; Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org 
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/d12fb5a474.html
--]]