[lac-discuss-en] ??????????? Q = utf-8 3A_LACRALO_Primera_Votaci VOTO_ANUNCIO = = = utf-8 b w4PCs24gZGUgbGEgbW9jacODwrNuIGRlIGNlbnN1cmEgLyBQcmltZXIg = q = utf-8 voto_de_LACRALO_Sobre_la_moci = C3 = 83 = C2 = B3n_de_censura =

Sat Oct 10 10:30:40 UTC 2015

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re:??????????? Q = utf-8 3A_LACRALO_Primera_Votaci VOTO_ANUNCIO = = = utf-8 b w4PCs24gZGUgbGEgbW9jacODwrNuIGRlIGNlbnN1cmEgLyBQcmltZXIg = q = utf-8 voto_de_LACRALO_Sobre_la_moci = C3 = 83 = C2 = B3n_de_censura = 
 From: asoto at ibero-americano.org

 Juan Manuel to further clarify, although it is in previous clarifications. 

 This motion should be rejected for not being covered by our regulations, the ALAC or ICANN. Just read it, does not cite any article in any standard. But try to give course to clear our names so many wrongs and injuries that caused serious injury and institutional staff 

 Thus we find a flat on the UN regulations and in which the articles quoted, including the relevant items of our rules. 

 It is a concatenated solution, as was explained.

 In the first vote, not because there is no competition in LACRALO, ie there is no article in any rule that permits treatment of the motion 

 The SI allows the process to continue with the modification of requirements for submission and approval, the regulation of any part of the world, including the United Nations, and also in the removal project authorities ICANN, still under discussion. All require the same. 

 Best regards 

 Alberto Soto 

 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] In the name of Humberto Carrasco 
 Posted on: Saturday, October 10, 2015 4:19 a.m. 
 To: Juan Manuel Rojas <jumaropi at yahoo.com>
 CC: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] VOTE AD: First LACRALO mociÃ³n VotaciÃ³n of censorship / First LACRALO vote of censure on the mociÃ³n 

 Dear Juan Manuel, 

 The vote contains the following question: 

 QUESTION: Do you think that LACRALO is competent to vote on the motion of censure? 

 If you vote by SI alternative, it is understood that LACRALO has jurisdiction to hear the motion of censure and therefore should continue processing. 

 If you vote for the NO option, it is understood that LACRALO lacks jurisdiction to hear the motion and the motion of censure may not be voted on by the community. 

 Cheers 

 10/10/2015 5:00 GMT + 01: 00 Juan Manuel Rojas <jumaropi at yahoo.com <mailto:jumaropi at yahoo.com> &gt;: 

 I do not understand why if the motion is voted no, is considered rejected and if you vote yes, is considered ignored. 

 It is not consistent. 
 Just my view on the matter in an open vote.

 Sent from my Huawei Mobile 

 staff at atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org> wrote: 
 > 
 > [[- Translated text (en -&gt; en) -]] 
 > 
 > Subject: VOTE NOTICE: LACRALO mocin First Voting of censorship / First LACRALO vote of censure on the mocin 
 > From: staff at atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org>
 > 
 > [ES] 
 > 
 > 
 > Dear All, 
 > 
 > 
 > According to the instruction we published on the next few steps in relation to the mocin of 
 > Trust &lt;  https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw> 
 > Secretariat is pleased to announce the start of the first ballot with respect 
 > Mocin to censure proposed by Carlton Samuels September 5, 
 > 2015. This ballot be open from 9 October 2015 at 23:00 UTC October 16 
 > 2015 at 23:00 UTC. 
 > 
 > 
 > Voting process is governed by the rules 12, 19 and 20 LACRALO 
 > RP.As for the proposed resolution, the next question to be 
 > Asked in the first ballot: 
 > 
 > 
 > *** 
 > QUESTION: Do you think that LACRALO is competent to vote a motion of 
 > Trust? 
 > 1. S, the mocin censorship should go ahead. 
 > 2. No, censorship mocin be ignored. 
 > *** 
 > Read the mocin censorship here: 
 > Http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-en/2015-September/01343 
 > 2.html 
 > <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-en/2015-September/013 
 > 432.html&gt; For more information about the next few steps in relation to the movement of 
 > Without trust:  https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > [ES] 
 > 
 > 
 > Hi everyone, 
 > 
 > 
 > According to the instructions regarding the 
 > &lt;  https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw> 
 > Censorship &lt;  https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw> 
 > LACRALO announce the start of the First Vote with relacina the Mocin of 
 > Censorship Proposal for Carlton Samuels on 05 September 2015. This 
 > Estarabierto votes from the October 9, 2015 23:00 UTC Up to 16 
 > October 2015 at 23:00 UTC. 
 > 
 > 
 > The voting process estargobernado by Rules 12, 19 and 20 of the 
 > LACRALO Rules of Procedure. With relacina the resolution proposal, 
 > The following is the question First Vote: 
 > 
 > 
 > *** 
 > QUESTION: You believe LACRALO paragraph shall have the mocin of Competition Voting 
 > Censorship? 
 > 1. Yes, censorship mocin Dbe procedure. 
 > 2. No, censorship mocin Dbe be ignored. 
 > *** 
 > Read the Mocin censorship here: 
 > Http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-es/2015-September/02939 
 > 8.html 
 > The next few steps in relation to the mocin censorship: 
 >  https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw 
 > 
 > 
 > Regards, 
 > 
 > 
 > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie 
 > Peregrine and Terri Agnew 
 > ICANN staff policy in support of ALAC 
 > E-mail: staff at atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org>
 > Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann <http://www.facebook.com/icann> &lt;  https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> 
 > AtLarge &lt;  https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> 
 > Twitter: @ &lt;  https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> 
 > &lt;  https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 

[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/11bc0e9699.html
--]]