[lac-discuss-en] FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: At-Large Review Working Party Draft Charter

aidanoblia at gmail.com aidanoblia at gmail.com
Fri Nov 27 19:17:28 UTC 2015 

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: At-Large Review Working Party Draft Charter 
 From: aidanoblia at gmail.com

 Carlos did not know from experience but I agree with most reason 
 That should be reflected in a document. I guess this is being 
 analyzing now could fit any provision in this regard. 


 If the working group concern if one agrees on that. 


 Kisses 






 The November 27, 2015, 11:36 am, Carlos Raul Gutierrez <crg at isoc-cr.org>
 wrote: 


> Gracias por tus comentarios Aida,
>
> en el GNSO council tuvimos una MUY MALA experiencia con unos expertos
> externos (Westland) que fueron “generosamente" contratados para hacer un
> estudio cuyo  resultado ha sido de muy baja aceptación. Tenemos que evitar
> a toda costa que sea una decisión exclusiva del Staff y comentarios como
> los tuyos DEBEN REFLEJARSE EXPLICITAMENTE EN LOS TERMINOS DE REFERENCIA
> (Charter & RFP).
>
> Saludos
>
> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
> _____________________
>
> email: crg at isoc-cr.org
> Skype: carlos.raulg
> +506 8837 7176 (cel)
> +506 4000 2000 (home)
> +506 2290 3678 (fax)
> _____________________
> Apartado 1571-1000
> San Jose, COSTA RICA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 27, 2015, at 6:54 AM, Aida Noblia <aidanoblia at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Comparto las dos propuestas de Vanda en cuanto a que el Experto
> Independiente debe tener un conocimiento de las vivencias en los diferentes
> países  y no solo un conocimiento teórico .  Sin conocer el contexto
> interno y la idiosincracia de las personas en cada país le será muy difícil
> tener idea clara del significado real de ciertos hechos,  acciones  e
> incluso palabras, ya que el mismo lenguaje tiene a veces expresiones o
> palabras que pueden no ser comprendidas en su contexto.
> También comparto lo dicho respecto a que es necesaria la experiencia en
> ICANN, que es un Organismo bastante complejo y requiere tiempo y dedicación
> para conocerlo.
>
>  Me preocupa la pregunta de Carlos,  no se me ocurre respuesta y me parece
> una pregunta esencial.
>
> El hecho de que los expertos reúnan las condiciones adecuadas para su
> cargo va a depender de lo que se establezca como requisitos necesarios
>  para su nombramiento y también de los criterios y métodos de designación
> que tengan las personas que lo designan.
>
>
> Saludos a todos.
>
>
>
> 2015-11-25 20:03 GMT-03:00 Carlos Raul Gutierrez <crg at isoc-cr.org>:
>
>> Gracias Vanda,
>>
>> es un punto muy importante. De igual manera me gustaría saber QUIEN
>> escoge al experto.
>>
>>
>> Saludos cordiales
>>
>> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
>> ISOC Costa Rica Chapter
>> skype carlos.raulg
>> +506 8837 7176  (New  Phone number!!!!)
>> ________
>> Apartado 1571-1000
>> COSTA RICA
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Vanda Scartezini <vanda at scartezini.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Estimados colegas
>>>
>>>  Como parte de esto grupo de trabajo les pido que miren los puntos
>>> levantados iniciales para la escoja de la organización que deberá ser
>>> contractada como expert. Yo personalmente he hecho algunos comentarios que
>>> están en la wiki acerca de:
>>>
>>>    1. el punto de diversidad  que para mi  es necesario que los
>>>    expertos contrastados tengan vivencia en diversos países no solo clientes
>>>    en estos países  y
>>>    2. La experiencia en ICANN. A mi lo relevante es que tipo de
>>>    experiencia en ICANN – participar en el mercado no es necesariamente lo
>>>    recomendado, tampoco experiencia en la comunidad de propiedad intelectual…
>>>    para mi debía tener experiencia como participante en la comunidad de
>>>    preferencia como simples atendente para una vision más amplia de todo el
>>>    complejo de ICANN
>>>
>>> Si tienen puntos que les parezcan relevantes, agradezco sus comentarios,
>>> en nuestra lista o en la WIKI.
>>>  Abrazos
>>> *Vanda Scartezini*
>>> *Polo Consultores Associados*
>>> *Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004*
>>> *01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil*
>>> *Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 <%2B55%2011%203266.6253>*
>>> *Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 <%2B%2055%2011%2098181.1464> *
>>> *So**rry for any typos. *
>>>
>>>
>>> From: <lac-discuss-en-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of
>>> ICANN Staff
>>> Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 5:43 PM
>>> To: LACRALO list
>>> Subject: [lac-discuss-en] CALL FOR COMMENTS: At-Large Review Working
>>> Party Draft Charter
>>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> The At-Large Review Working Party is calling for comments across the
>>> At-Large Community for its Draft Charter:
>>> https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw. To provide your input, please log
>>> in to Confluence wiki and submit it on that page using the comment function
>>> by December 9, 2015 at 23:59 UTC. See the At-Large Review background
>>> information below.
>>>
>>> ==
>>>
>>> ICANN Bylaws require independent reviews of its organisationsal
>>> effectiveness to reinforce its various accountability mechanisms to the
>>> community. The first review of the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC)
>>> <https://community.icann.org/x/NxAnAw> was held from 2008 to 2012. The
>>> focus of that review was on ALAC itself because the Regional At-Large
>>> Organisations (RALOs) and their At-Large Structures (ALSs) were newly
>>> established and it would have been inappropriate to review them at that
>>> time.
>>>
>>> The current At-Large Review <https://community.icann.org/x/Y5MQAw> is
>>> underway. The focus of this Review is to examine organizational
>>> effectiveness of the At-Large community, with the focus on the five RALOs
>>> and the nearly 200 ALSs. This review is scheduled to begin approximately in
>>> April 2016 and be carried out by an Independent Examiner. Involvement of
>>> the At-Large community as well as input and participation from the broader
>>> community are important components of this review process.
>>>
>>> As discussed in ALAC Meetings, the Organizational Effectiveness
>>> Committee of the Board
>>> <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/organizational-effectiveness-committee-2014-03-21-en> has
>>> requested that an At-Large Review Working Party
>>> <https://community.icann.org/x/aZMQAw> be assembled to function as a
>>> liaison between the ALAC/At-Large community, the Independent Examiner and
>>> the Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the Board to provide input on
>>> review criteria and the At-Large assessment, coordinate interviews and
>>> objectively supply clarification and responses to the preliminary findings
>>> and recommendations. Once a final report is issued and the Board takes
>>> action on it, as appropriate, the At-Large Working Party is expected to
>>> coordinate with the At-Large community to prepare an Implementation Plan
>>> and champion implementation of improvement activities.
>>>
>>> The draft charter of the At-Large Review Working Party was reviewed in
>>> its teleconference on November 23, 2015
>>> <https://community.icann.org/x/kcJYAw>. The draft charter is now open
>>> for comments from RALO members.* You may download and review the draft
>>> charter from this wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw
>>> <https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw>*. To provide your input, please
>>> log in to Confluence wiki and submit it on that page using the comment
>>> function *by December 9, 2015 at 23:59 UTC**.* If you don’t have a
>>> login or have other issue using the wiki, kindly contact
>>> staff at atlarge.icann.org.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie
>>> Peregrine and Terri Agnew
>>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
>>> E-mail: staff at atlarge.icann.org
>>> Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>
>>> atlarge <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>
>>> Twitter: @ <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge
>>> <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> lac-discuss-es mailing list
>>> lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>>>
>>> http://www.lacralo.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lac-discuss-es mailing list
>> lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>>
>> http://www.lacralo.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Aida Noblia
>
>
>




 Aida Noblia 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/a8709f588c.html
--]]

More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list