[lac-discuss-en] FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: At-Large Review Working Party Draft Charter

aidanoblia at gmail.com aidanoblia at gmail.com
Fri Nov 27 12:55:57 UTC 2015 

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: At-Large Review Working Party Draft Charter 
 From: aidanoblia at gmail.com

 I share the two proposals Vanda in that the Expert 
 Independent must have a knowledge of the experiences in the different 
 countries and not just a theoretical knowledge. Without knowing the context 
 internal and idiosyncrasies of the people in each country will be very difficult 
 have a clear idea of \u200b\u200bthe real meaning of certain facts, actions and 
 even words, since the same language is sometimes expressions or 
 words can not be understood in context. 
 I also agree with what was said about that experience is necessary 
 ICANN, which is a very complex organism and requires time and dedication 
 to meet him. 


 I worry about the question of Carlos, I can not think response and I think 
 an essential question.


 The fact that experts meet the conditions for office 
 It will depend on what is established as requirements for 
 appointment and also the criteria and methods that have nomination 
 people that designate. 




 Greetings to all. 






 11/25/2015 20:03 GMT-03: 00 Carlos Raul Gutierrez <crg at isoc-cr.org> : 


> Gracias Vanda,
>
> es un punto muy importante. De igual manera me gustaría saber QUIEN escoge
> al experto.
>
>
> Saludos cordiales
>
> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
> ISOC Costa Rica Chapter
> skype carlos.raulg
> +506 8837 7176  (New  Phone number!!!!)
> ________
> Apartado 1571-1000
> COSTA RICA
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Vanda Scartezini <vanda at scartezini.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Estimados colegas
>>
>>  Como parte de esto grupo de trabajo les pido que miren los puntos
>> levantados iniciales para la escoja de la organización que deberá ser
>> contractada como expert. Yo personalmente he hecho algunos comentarios que
>> están en la wiki acerca de:
>>
>>    1. el punto de diversidad  que para mi  es necesario que los expertos
>>    contrastados tengan vivencia en diversos países no solo clientes en estos
>>    países  y
>>    2. La experiencia en ICANN. A mi lo relevante es que tipo de
>>    experiencia en ICANN – participar en el mercado no es necesariamente lo
>>    recomendado, tampoco experiencia en la comunidad de propiedad intelectual…
>>    para mi debía tener experiencia como participante en la comunidad de
>>    preferencia como simples atendente para una vision más amplia de todo el
>>    complejo de ICANN
>>
>> Si tienen puntos que les parezcan relevantes, agradezco sus comentarios,
>> en nuestra lista o en la WIKI.
>>  Abrazos
>> *Vanda Scartezini*
>> *Polo Consultores Associados*
>> *Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004*
>> *01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil*
>> *Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 <%2B55%2011%203266.6253>*
>> *Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 <%2B%2055%2011%2098181.1464> *
>> *So**rry for any typos. *
>>
>>
>> From: <lac-discuss-en-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of
>> ICANN Staff
>> Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 5:43 PM
>> To: LACRALO list
>> Subject: [lac-discuss-en] CALL FOR COMMENTS: At-Large Review Working
>> Party Draft Charter
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> The At-Large Review Working Party is calling for comments across the
>> At-Large Community for its Draft Charter:
>> https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw. To provide your input, please log
>> in to Confluence wiki and submit it on that page using the comment function
>> by December 9, 2015 at 23:59 UTC. See the At-Large Review background
>> information below.
>>
>> ==
>>
>> ICANN Bylaws require independent reviews of its organisationsal
>> effectiveness to reinforce its various accountability mechanisms to the
>> community. The first review of the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC)
>> <https://community.icann.org/x/NxAnAw> was held from 2008 to 2012. The
>> focus of that review was on ALAC itself because the Regional At-Large
>> Organisations (RALOs) and their At-Large Structures (ALSs) were newly
>> established and it would have been inappropriate to review them at that
>> time.
>>
>> The current At-Large Review <https://community.icann.org/x/Y5MQAw> is
>> underway. The focus of this Review is to examine organizational
>> effectiveness of the At-Large community, with the focus on the five RALOs
>> and the nearly 200 ALSs. This review is scheduled to begin approximately in
>> April 2016 and be carried out by an Independent Examiner. Involvement of
>> the At-Large community as well as input and participation from the broader
>> community are important components of this review process.
>>
>> As discussed in ALAC Meetings, the Organizational Effectiveness
>> Committee of the Board
>> <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/organizational-effectiveness-committee-2014-03-21-en> has
>> requested that an At-Large Review Working Party
>> <https://community.icann.org/x/aZMQAw> be assembled to function as a
>> liaison between the ALAC/At-Large community, the Independent Examiner and
>> the Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the Board to provide input on
>> review criteria and the At-Large assessment, coordinate interviews and
>> objectively supply clarification and responses to the preliminary findings
>> and recommendations. Once a final report is issued and the Board takes
>> action on it, as appropriate, the At-Large Working Party is expected to
>> coordinate with the At-Large community to prepare an Implementation Plan
>> and champion implementation of improvement activities.
>>
>> The draft charter of the At-Large Review Working Party was reviewed in
>> its teleconference on November 23, 2015
>> <https://community.icann.org/x/kcJYAw>. The draft charter is now open
>> for comments from RALO members.* You may download and review the draft
>> charter from this wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw
>> <https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw>*. To provide your input, please
>> log in to Confluence wiki and submit it on that page using the comment
>> function *by December 9, 2015 at 23:59 UTC**.* If you don’t have a login
>> or have other issue using the wiki, kindly contact
>> staff at atlarge.icann.org.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie
>> Peregrine and Terri Agnew
>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
>> E-mail: staff at atlarge.icann.org
>> Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>
>> atlarge <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>
>> Twitter: @ <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge
>> <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lac-discuss-es mailing list
>> lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>>
>> http://www.lacralo.org
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-es mailing list
> lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>
> http://www.lacralo.org
>






 Aida Noblia 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/1b03d3047e.html
--]]

More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list