[lac-discuss-en] = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????
asoto at ibero-americano.org
asoto at ibero-americano.org
Thu Jun 25 19:08:39 UTC 2015
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????
From: asoto at ibero-americano.org
Dear Alexander, just finished ICANN 53, we will with this and everything else that is still working.
Best regards
Alberto Soto
From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] In the name of Alejandro Pisanty
Posted on: Thursday, June 25, 2015 24:35
To: LACRALO
CC: LACRALO discussion list
Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????
Hello,
I think we are in a position to declare a consensus on these guidelines yesterday Sergio and others verbally expressed my support for the proposal.
Alberto and Humberto, really really ask you to institute the appropriate process.
With this agreement we can:
1. explore the real situation of the non initiate formal proceedings;
2. explore what formal rules would apply;
3. immediately help organizations that need it most.
Best regards
Alejandro Pisanty
On Thu, June 25, 2015 at 11:42 a.m., <jam at jacquelinemorris.com <mailto:jam at jacquelinemorris.com> > Wrote:
[[Translated text (en -> en) -]]
Subject: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????
From: jam at jacquelinemorris.com <mailto:jam at jacquelinemorris.com>
The devil is always, however, in the details.
The June 25, 2015 10:28 "Carlton Samuels" <carlton.samuels at gmail.com <mailto:carlton.samuels at gmail.com> > He wrote:
> Yes, we are now in the ballpark. I can support these for baseline.
>
> -Carlton
>
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799 <tel:876-818-1799>
> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> =============================
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:57 AM, <apisanty at gmail.com <mailto:apisanty at gmail.com> > wrote:
>
>>
>> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>>
>> Subject: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =????
>> From: apisanty at gmail.com <mailto:apisanty at gmail.com>
>>
>> Colleagues,
>>
>>
>> today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion
>> on metrics.
>>
>>
>> Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group,
>> I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. This
>> It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not
>> They made by self-interest to distort the discussion.
>>
>>
>> What we need we are accountability and transparency between us
>> thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be
>> identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute
>> They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer
>> counted. And there
>> an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are
>> difficult to participate but have the will to do so.Among these there
>> Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to
>> spend time with family or work that sustains; changing
>> directive or mandate; and many more circumstances.
>>
>>
>> A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and
>> difficult to counterfeit. Would make a "triage", ie would
>> rather obvious
>> 5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and
>> They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip
>> intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that
>> recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or
>> by way of decertification. This assumes renewal cycles
>> certifications, we must institute.
>>
>>
>> There is a classification of units that can help us further
>> in this process:
>>
>>
>> 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and
>> contribution to substantive policy issues.His proposals are
>> LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy
>> ALAC and ICANN.
>>
>>
>> 2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters
>> Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc.
>>
>>
>> 3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally
>> leading to "make presence" for elections and selection
>> processes
>> for participation in events, especially if they involve support for
>> travel.
>>
>>
>> Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations
>> should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who
>> make appearances type 2 pass to level 1.
>>
>>
>> If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group
>> Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good
>> implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and
>> achievable.
>>
>>
>> Is there any disagreement with these general principles?
>>
>>
>> Alejandro Pisanty
>>
>>
>> -
>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
>> UNAM Faculty of Chemistry
>> 3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
>> + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
>> SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475
>> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
>> UNAM Join the LinkedIn group,
>> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
>> ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
>> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>>
>>
>>
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/75a2ccc26a.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list