[lac-discuss-en] = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????

apisanty at gmail.com apisanty at gmail.com
Thu Jun 25 15:36:06 UTC 2015


[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? 
 From: apisanty at gmail.com

 Hello, 


 I think we are in a position to declare a consensus on these 
 Yesterday Sergio guidelines and other verbally expressed support me 
 proposal. 


 Alberto and Humberto, really really ask you to institute the process 
 corresponding. 


 With this agreement we can: 


 1. explore the real situation of the non initiate processes 
 formal; 


 2. explore what formal rules would apply; 


 3. immediately help organizations that need it most. 


 Best regards 


 Alejandro Pisanty 


 On Thu, June 25, 2015 at 11:42 a.m., <jam at jacquelinemorris.com> wrote: 
 > 
> [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]
>
>  Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????
>  Desde: jam at jacquelinemorris.com
>
>  El diablo, es siempre, sin embargo, en los detalles.
>  El 25 de junio 2015 10:28, &quot;Carlton Samuels&quot; <
> carlton.samuels at gmail.com> escribió:
>
>
> > Yes, we are now in the ballpark.  I can support these for baseline.
> >
> > -Carlton
> >
> >
> > ==============================
> > Carlton A Samuels
> > Mobile: 876-818-1799
> > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> > =============================
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:57 AM, <apisanty at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
> >>
> >>  Subject: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =????
> >>  From: apisanty at gmail.com
> >>
> >>  Colleagues,
> >>
> >>
> >>  today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion
> >>  on metrics.
> >>
> >>
> >>  Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group,
> >>  I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. This
> >>  It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not
> >>  They made by self-interest to distort the discussion.
> >>
> >>
> >>  What we need we are accountability and transparency between us
> >>  thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be
> >>  identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute
> >>  They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer
> >> counted. And there
> >>  an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are
> >>  difficult to participate but have the will to do so.Among these there
> >>  Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to
> >>  spend time with family or work that sustains; changing
> >>  directive or mandate; and many more circumstances.
> >>
> >>
> >>  A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and
> >>  difficult to counterfeit. Would make a &quot;triage&quot;, ie would
> >> rather obvious
> >>  5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and
> >>  They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip
> >>  intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that
> >>  recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or
> >>  by way of decertification. This assumes renewal cycles
> >>  certifications, we must institute.
> >>
> >>
> >>  There is a classification of units that can help us further
> >>  in this process:
> >>
> >>
> >>  1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and
> >>  contribution to substantive policy issues.His proposals are
> >>  LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy
> >>  ALAC and ICANN.
> >>
> >>
> >>  2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters
> >>  Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc.
> >>
> >>
> >>  3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally
> >>  leading to &quot;make presence&quot; for elections and selection
> >> processes
> >>  for participation in events, especially if they involve support for
> >>  travel.
> >>
> >>
> >>  Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations
> >>  should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who
> >>  make appearances type 2 pass to level 1.
> >>
> >>
> >>  If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group
> >>  Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good
> >>  implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and
> >> achievable.
> >>
> >>
> >>  Is there any disagreement with these general principles?
> >>
> >>
> >>  Alejandro Pisanty
> >>
> >>
> >>  -
> >>  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> >>      Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
> >>  UNAM Faculty of Chemistry
> >>  3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
> >>  + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
> >>  SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475
> >>  Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
> >>  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
> >>  UNAM Join the LinkedIn group,
> >>  http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
> >>  Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
> >>  ---- &gt;&gt; Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
> >>  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/4bd4b5b256.html
--]]




More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list