[lac-discuss-en] = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =????

Jacqueline Morris jam at jacquelinemorris.com
Thu Jun 25 14:41:40 UTC 2015


The devil, is always, however, in the details.
On 25 Jun 2015 10:28, "Carlton Samuels" <carlton.samuels at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, we are now in the ballpark.  I can support these for baseline.
>
> -Carlton
>
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> =============================
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:57 AM, <apisanty at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>>
>>  Subject: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =????
>>  From: apisanty at gmail.com
>>
>>  Colleagues,
>>
>>
>>  today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion
>>  on metrics.
>>
>>
>>  Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group,
>>  I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. This
>>  It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not
>>  They made by self-interest to distort the discussion.
>>
>>
>>  What we need we are accountability and transparency between us
>>  thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be
>>  identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute
>>  They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer
>> counted. And there
>>  an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are
>>  difficult to participate but have the will to do so.Among these there
>>  Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to
>>  spend time with family or work that sustains; changing
>>  directive or mandate; and many more circumstances.
>>
>>
>>  A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and
>>  difficult to counterfeit. Would make a &quot;triage&quot;, ie would
>> rather obvious
>>  5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and
>>  They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip
>>  intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that
>>  recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or
>>  by way of decertification. This assumes renewal cycles
>>  certifications, we must institute.
>>
>>
>>  There is a classification of units that can help us further
>>  in this process:
>>
>>
>>  1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and
>>  contribution to substantive policy issues.His proposals are
>>  LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy
>>  ALAC and ICANN.
>>
>>
>>  2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters
>>  Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc.
>>
>>
>>  3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally
>>  leading to &quot;make presence&quot; for elections and selection
>> processes
>>  for participation in events, especially if they involve support for
>>  travel.
>>
>>
>>  Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations
>>  should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who
>>  make appearances type 2 pass to level 1.
>>
>>
>>  If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group
>>  Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good
>>  implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and
>> achievable.
>>
>>
>>  Is there any disagreement with these general principles?
>>
>>
>>  Alejandro Pisanty
>>
>>
>>  -
>>  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>      Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
>>  UNAM Faculty of Chemistry
>>  3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
>>  + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
>>  SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475
>>  Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
>>  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
>>  UNAM Join the LinkedIn group,
>>  http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
>>  Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
>>  ---- &gt;&gt; Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
>>  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>>
>>
>>
>> [[--Original text (es)
>> http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/22a894d8ba.html
>> --]]
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lac-discuss-en mailing list
>> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-en/attachments/20150625/e34160e4/attachment.html>


More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list