[lac-discuss-en] FW: FW: FW: Bipartisan Amendment to DOTCOM Act
asoto at ibero-americano.org
asoto at ibero-americano.org
Tue Jun 9 16:52:38 UTC 2015
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: FW: FW: FW: Bipartisan Amendment to DOTCOM Act
From: asoto at ibero-americano.org
Estmados today or tomorrow send an email to the issuance of a document
part of LACRALO.
Aquuna reading very interesting comments on the same Thematic.
Best regards
Alberto Soto
From: iana-issues-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[Mailto: iana-issues-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of Sbastien
Bachollet
Posted on: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 11:11 a.m.
To: IANA Issues
Subject: [IANA-issues] FW: [CCWG-ACCT] FW: Bipartisan Amendment to DOTCOM Act
For info.
Seems interesting.
All the best
Sbastien Bachollet
+33 6 07 66 89 33
Blog: http://sebastien.bachollet.fr/
Mail: Sbastien Bachollet <sebastien at bachollet.com
<mailto:sebastien at bachollet.com> >
From: Paul Rosenzweig <paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
<mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com> >
Date: mardi 9 juin 2015 15:16
'Accountability Cross Community'
<accountability-cross-community at icann.org
<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org> >
Objet: [CCWG-ACCT] FW: Bipartisan Amendment to DOTCOM Act
Colleagues
Below is a brief notice, and attached is a copy of a bill That will be
Considered in Congress tomorrow Relating to the IANA transition. UNLIKE
other bills floating in Congress, this one has the support of the Chairman
and Ranking Member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. In other
words, it has support of Both Democrats and Republicans and, implicitly, is
something the Administration would likely accept.THUS, though one can
never be sure In These matters, I assess it as it reasonably likely That esta
Will Become bill law.
On the Merits, my own sense is That many in the community will welcome the
Provisions of esta bill. First, and foremost, it puts Congress on record in
behalf of the overall goal of having the transition happen, just thus laying to
Concerns rest That Might some in Congress seek to short-circuit the process.
In more detail (and you can read the short text for yourself, in the
attached PDF), the bill provides:
1. There will be 30 legislative days (ie working week days) after
notification to Congress prior to the transfer going into effect. This will
allow Congress to review the terms of the transfer. To stop it, however,
would require a separate bill enacted into law.
2. It requires NTIA to certify That the Proposed transition meets the five
September criteria by the NTIA at the start of the process.This Seems to very
modest requirement, since if our proposal did not meet That set of
requirements, NTIA would not approve it in the first instance.
3. It requires Also NTIA to certify That ICANN has approved and Implemented
all required bylaw end Changes contained in the report of the CCWG and the
CWG before the transition OCCURS, ie ICANN has to follow through and
the bylaw review process complete before the Formal termination of the
contract.
Regards
Paul
Paul Rosenzweig
paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
<mailto:paul.rosenzweigesq at redbranchconsulting.com>
O: +1 (202) 547-0660
M: +1 (202) 329-9650
VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066
Link to my PGP Key
<http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=articl
e & id = 19 & Itemid = 9>
Subject: Bipartisan Amendment to DOTCOM Act
Friends:
Please find attached a copy of the Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute
That Walden Chairman, Ranking Member Pallone, and Mr. Shimkus Have Agreed
to. As we Mentioned on calls to many of you, we think esta amendment
Represents to the responsible path forward respects the multistakeholder
process without abrogating our Committee's oversight of NTIA.
Very shortly, we will be noticing a subcommittee markup For This Wednesday,
Where we expect the subcommittee will report favorably to the HR 805
With bipartisan support committee.
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/d85af27bd2.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list