[lac-discuss-en] regarding election

[Roosevelt King]

If that is so, why did Lance end up being the sole nomination. So now you want to get others interested? I vehemently object. Lance did not lose the process and therefore there is no need to abandon it in favour of others who did not want the job in the first place, but now that the conspiracy has lost, you are demanding a new process? Seems to me that you must win by hook or crook.

 

ROK

 

From: lac-discuss-en-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:lac-discuss-en-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Vanda Scartezini
Sent: Tuesday, 28 July 2015 12:06
To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org; LACRALO list
Subject: [lac-discuss-en] regarding election
Importance: High

 

 Whatever the accounting is my view is that restarting this process , calling for nominations, is the best way to guarantee we will follow a total legal process without any question. 

Maybe other colleagues also think in this opportunity to be part of ALAC and join the election.

  Best to all

 

Cualquiera sea el resultado , en mi opinion lo mejor que hacemos es empezar nuevamente esto proceso, para garantizar que lo hacemos en total seguimiento de las reglas sin cualquiera cuestión.

Pienso que quizá otros colegas también vuelvan a analisar la oportunidad que es estar en el ALC y participen de la election.

Abrazos a todos 

 

Vanda Scartezini

Polo Consultores Associados

Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004

01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253

Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 

Sorry for any typos. 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-en/attachments/20150728/97832947/attachment-0001.html>