[lac-discuss-en] VOTE RESULTS: Confirmation LACRALO Poll - ALAC Representative (2015 AGM - 2017 AGM)

rok at bango.org.bb rok at bango.org.bb
Tue Jul 28 15:44:14 UTC 2015


[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: VOTE RESULTS: Confirmation LACRALO Poll - ALAC Representative (2015 AGM - 2017 AGM) 
 From: rok at bango.org.bb

 Dear Staff, 






 I question your interpretation of esta outcome. Since there was only one 
 nomination, the onus is on the no vote to win. An abstention is not a non- 
 vote but it is a vote and Hence it even though not a yes vote, can not be 
 Counted as a no vote. THEREFORE the vote must not Exceed all other votes 
 to win. In This case it has not. 






 Note That this is not a matter of adding the abstentions to the yes vote. 
 There are three results and for any result to win it must Exceed the Total 
 amount of the other results plus one. Note That very Clearly this is not a 
 vote for more than one candidate only Where the yes and no votes count.Here 
 is a matter to confirm a candidate and the only way That candidate can lose 
 is if the majority vote of the group votes no. 






 Especially In This case Where this is an online vote Which Gives The entire 
 group the opportunity to vote over time. , According to our rules on quorum is 
 not required for an online vote for the specific fact That All members are 
 Deemed to be present. UNLESS Deemed a member is inactive, it would seem to 
 That I Should be the no vote of half plus one The entire group and not just 
 Those half plus one of voting, Where It Should not matter whether or not all 
 Voted yes the other members, abstained or did not vote. My understanding is 
 That LACRALO has 47 members. Hence it will not vote of 23.5 + 1 = 24.5 votes would 
 Have to be amounted by the no vote in order to win. You are not worrying 
 About a quorum Deemed Because all members are present. Even if you did it 
 based on the amount voting, the vote still not Loses since the requirement 
 would be 21.5 + 22.5 = 1 votes votes and since there are no half votes, That 
 would be 23 votes to win 22.5 Because You need votes to win.






 It would seem to me That in the spirit of a democratic and transparent 
 process and Where one person is to be confirmed, That the onus must be on 
 the no vote to Exceed half of the members of the constituency. FOR THOSE 
 WHO abstained or did not vote, there is only one consideration and That Is 
 That if more than half the group did not want to confirm a candidate, They 
 would rise up and Ensure They Voted no. That did not happen in esta case. 
 Sufficient people did not say no or not and Hence it Voted the confirmation 
 process is complete in Favour of the candidate. Any other way of 
 esta interpreting can only run counter to the spirit of democracy and would 
 be less than transparent. Actually bordering on unfair and manipulative. 






 THEREFORE I am calling on staff to recall That message and post to correct 
 message based on the fact That the no vote needs 23 votes since all 
 Assumed members are present and a result is based on the majority of the 
 constituency Because there is only one candidate in the confirmation 
 process. 






 Thanking you for your cooperation. 






 ROK 










 From: lac-discuss-en-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 [Mailto: lac-discuss-en-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of ICANN 
 At-Large Staff 
 Sent: Tuesday, 28 July 2015 9:53 
 A: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org; 
 lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Subject: [lac-discuss-en] VOTE RESULTS: Confirmation LACRALO Poll - ALAC 
 Representative (2015 AGM - 2017 AGM) 






 IN == == 






 Dear All, 






 Kindly note Poll Confirmation That the LACRALO ALAC Representative (2015 
 AGM 2017 AGM) is now closed. Please see below the vote result Being sent 
 On Behalf Of Alberto Soto, Chair of LACRALO, and Humberto Carrasco, 
 Secretary of LACRALO. 





 QUESTION: Do you wish to confirm Lance Hinds as the ALAC representative from 
 LACRALO for the period AGM2015 through AGM2017? 


 * Yes 


 *Do Not 


 * Abstention 


 


 Poll As at close: Monday 27 July 2015 23:00 UTC 
 Number of voters: 43 Group size: 47 Percentage Voted: 91.49 
 Ranked by votes 




 Rank 


 Options 


 You votes 


 % 




 1 


 No / No 


 21 


 48.84 




 2 


 Yes / Yes 


 19 


 44.19 




 3 


 Abstain / abstention 


 3 


 6.98 






 Counting only Yes and No votes, the Percentages are: 


 No 21/40 = 52.5%


 Yes 19/40 = 47.5% 






 The selection process for the ALAC seat currently are occupied by Fatima 
 Cambronero will be Restarted with a new call for nominations. 






 You view the result Independently May under: 
 https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=4940Zw4m2YAWxvmPU7PAWLyP 






 ES == == 






 Hello everyone, 






 Please note that the survey Confirmation of LACRALO for 
 ALAC representative (2015-2017 AGM) is closed. please, 
 quickly find the result of the ballot which sent estsiendo 
 on behalf of Alberto Soto, President of LACRALO and Humberto Carrasco, 
 Secretary of LACRALO. 


 


 QUESTION: Lance Hinds want to confirm as representative of LACRALO to 
 the ALAC for the period until AGM2017 AGM2015? 


 *Yes 


 *Do Not 


 * Abstention


 


 Closing the vote: Monday July 27, 2015 23:00 GMT 


 Number of voters: 43 Tamao group: 47 Percentage of vote: 91.49 


 Ranked by votes 




 Position 


 Options 


 Votes 


 % 




 1 


 No / No 


 21 


 48.84 




 2 


 Yes / Yes 


 19 


 44.19 




 3 


 Abstain / abstention 


 3 


 6.98 






 Counting only the votes 'Yes' and 'No', the percentages are: 


 No 21/40 = 52.5% 


 If 19/40 = 47.5% 






 The selection process for the seat currently occupied by ALAC 
 Ftima Cambronero serreiniciado Through a new call. 






 You can review the results independently under: 
 https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=4940Zw4m2YAWxvmPU7PAWLyP 






 Regards, 






 Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie 
 Peregrine and Terri Agnew 


 ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC 


 E-mail: staff at atlarge.icann.org 


 Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann <  https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> 
 AtLarge <  https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> 


 Twitter: @ <  https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> 
 <  https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> 

















[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ca3f28dea5.html
--]]




More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list