[lac-discuss-en] ? = Q = iso-8859-1 BFtriunfo_por_aclamaci = F3n = 3F =

Tue Jul 21 23:04:36 UTC 2015

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re:? = Q = iso-8859-1 BFtriunfo_por_aclamaci = F3n = 3F = 
 From: asoto at ibero-americano.org

 Dear Leon and all. 

 For various reasons the chain of events was overcome. Those reasons are 
 attributable to Humberto and me, and are both professional and private 
 major in both cases. Then after that period, we talked with 
 Humberto and noticed that not habamos made the ballot. 

 Voting For? Because there is no reglamentacin to tell us to do 
 in the case of one candidate. 

 Background cases have equal, ie presentation of a single 
 candidate for office: Natalia, and Humberto and mo in the last 
 I votaciny think there were any more. 

 Now we proceeded in the same way, ie Voting call, although 
 we followed the chronology of events. 

 What we coordinate with the Staff and aslo did.

 Our irregularity can be with dates, not the procedure. 

 Quejcuando we not inform anyone on the ballot. 

 I formalized complaints to the Staff for having sought, received and make 
 publish an SOI and an additional document, then open the ballot. This Is To 
 is an irregularity which did not have an answer. Because I think 
 irregular? Because the first was made explicit by the applicant in our 
 monthly meeting in the day yesterday. In this presentation we heard a 
 Profile of a businessman (ISP) and also President of the Chamber afna 
 activity. Many have considered a conflict of interest with 
 the end user and did notice. Then he asks the applicant for 
 Staff enviaclaraciones part of that, and tells him estfaltando 
 to complete their profile. And this is a serious irregularity. And msan 
 when the ballot and estabierta. 

 Now someone saw the post as Staff to aclamacin resolved in a 
 date subsequent to that chain of events, but before the call to 
 Voting. This is another serious irregularity.

 Leon, for the cases cited as precedents nor was opposition, if 
 We consult the list and realizla ballot. Also, strange me 
 cumplitodo say that. Cunaod you collaborated with me in a monthly meeting 
 (I think in Los Angeles), I wanted to go ahead and as Secretary of the 
 meeting told me that we can not move forward without taking list Well, 
 comply with the procedure and we list, then seguadelante. I Believe 
 loso that in all cases we must follow procedures, and if there are none, 
 take history (custom, another source of law) and proceed 
 Likewise. 

 To provide transparency, the ballot must be done, because only cumplitbNL&gt; presentaciny process multiple media. There was no aclamacin or 
 requested or written by anyone LACRALO other irregularity. 

 We have been criticized for lack of transparency because the Secretary 
 Staff envial personally and not translated two lines in a document. Those 
 lines were not even in a single background. 

 best regards 

 Alberto Soto 

 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of Len 
 Felipe Sanchez Amba 
 Posted on: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 7:37 pm 
 To: Sergio Bronstein 
 CC: LACRALO 
 Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] aclamacin win? 

 Dear All, 

 Coming late to the discussion wanted to make some considerations. 

 First, I believe that we must analyze the chain of events under the 
 dates related. In the wiki own timetable is set for the 
 Selection of LACRALO ALAC members. In him, we can see that the chain 
 Events are desarrollde follows: 

 30 April- Announcement of invitation and call for nominations 

 April 30 to 9 May- period for nominations 

 16 May- Date limit for acceptance of nominations by 
 Nominees 

 18 to 25 May- Realization of elections if there is more than one 
 nominee (situation that did not occur in this occasion) 

 In response to this calendar Lance Hinds and being the sole candidate 
 of the region, I see as an act of influence by the Staff that 
 Lance has settled that had been the winner of the election. Perhaps 
 trmino By aclamacinno is adequate but to be honest I do not remember 
 seeing any opposition on the list during the period of 
 nominations. Therefore, I do not consider what was done by the staff in 
 performing their work support the ALAC and RALOs must be taken 
 as misconduct or bad faith or with intent to 
 any manipulation. That's my impression.If the communication had 
 before the expiry of the periods completed, another will be my opinion. Do Not 
 being as, it seems unfair to label irregular work performed 
 Staff. 

 However, as to the designation of Lance as representative 
 LACRALO to ALAC, I think the process is exhausted timely manner and 
 therefore it does not know where this comes ballot. In any case, if claimed 
 irregularities, it seems to me that this process will lack of Voting 
 sustenance and therefore I will seem irregular. 

 By qunadie ms postul? By nominating another postulate qunadie ms 
 person? 

 I support the designation of Lance not only because I worked with him but 
 because I believe that the processes were accomplished and what is today 
 extemporneo doing is not only lacking but besides livelihood. 

 Cheers, 

 Len 

 On 21/07/2015, at 17:19, Sergio Bronstein <bronstein.sergio at gmail.com 
<mailto:bronstein.sergio at gmail.com> &gt; Wrote: 

 Good afternoon Alberto and Humberto 

 It seems that several members of Lacralo that we disagree with the 
 use of the concept &quot;by aclamacin&quot;. 

 In this regard, I call on those who represent us to transmit to the staff 
 an order of explanations for this typical, since its use seems 
 inappropriate when several have voted against. Say &quot;aclamacin&quot; 
 makes a huge majority see it was not such; is engaosos use and, 
 therefore transparent. 

 a hug, 

 Sergio Bronstein 

 Vice-president 

 Internauta Venezuela 

 The July 21, 2015, 17:18, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty at gmail.com 
<mailto:apisanty at gmail.com> &gt; Wrote

 Hello Alberto and Humberto, especially, but also Silvia Vivanco and Heidi 
 Ulrich, 

 can someone explain quen 
 https://community.icann.org/m/mobile.action#page/51413146 
 Lance Hinds GanAbout reprsentante choice for the ALAC ** BY 
 ACLAMACIN **? 

 The evidence of irregularities supported by ICANN staff builds 
 precipitously. 

 Alejandro Pisanty 

 - 

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty 
 UNAM Faculty of Chemistry 
 Av.University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico 
 + 52-1-5541444475 <tel:%2B52-1-5541444475> FROM ABROAD 
 +525541444475 <tel:%2B525541444475> +525541444475 SMS FROM MEXICO 
<tel:%2B525541444475>
 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com <http://pisanty.blogspot.com/>
 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty 
 UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, 
 http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty 
 ---- &gt;&gt; Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org <http://www.isoc.org/>
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

 _______________________________________________ 

[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/f54b272e79.html
--]]