[lac-discuss-en] Subject: Re: ICANN's risk management

[hcarrascob at gmail.com]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Subject: Re: ICANN's risk management 
 From: hcarrascob at gmail.com

 Thanks Fatima, 


 Procredera make the survey. 


 Regards 






 Alberto Soto <asoto at ibero-americano.org> i wrote: 
 > Thanks Ftima. It is incredible that with a little of each collaboration, 
 > Is advancing so quickly. 
 > Only to be much better if they were not always the same, our Regin 
 > Muchsimo will grow. 
 > Best Regards 
 > 
 > Alberto Sotol 
 > 
 > 
 > ----- Original Message ----- 
 > From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 > [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Fatima 
 > Cambronero 
 > Sent: I saturday, January 24, 2015 9:25 pm
 > To: Alejandro Pisanty 
 > CC: LACRALO Espaol 
 > Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] ICANN's risk management 
 > 
 > Humberto, Alejandro, 
 > 
 > To contribute to this proposal by Alejandro activity, which seems a 
 > Very good initiative, accompanying table risks to ICANN as 
 > Company and have been included in the document enviAlejandro with 
 > Each tems in two versions: espaol inglsy. 
 > As to the list of discussion in English do not get documents 
 > Attachments, I copy below the same content as in Table I estincluido 
 > Attached. 
 > Please check for sb error in translation. 
 > 
 > Best regards, 
 > Fatima Cambronero 
 > 
 > 
 > * Enterprise-Wide Risks ICANN list * 
 > 
 > 
 > 1) Failure to Maintain and adhere to it adequately Existing accountability 
 >-Mechanisms. 
 > 
 > Failure to properly maintain and adhere to the mechanisms of rendicin 
 > Existing accounts. 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 2) Failure to Demonstrate accountability and transparency of Sufficient 
 > Organization.
 > 
 > Failure to demonstrate sufficient accountability and transparency 
 > Organization. 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 3) Lower than forecasted revenues. 
 > 
 > Lower revenues than expected. 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 4) Adverse legal or other dispute resolution ruling, treats including possible 
 > Related penalties, fees and costs. 
 > 
 > Judicial-resolution or other adverse resolution of disputes, including 
 > Possible penalties, fees and related costs. 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 5) Failure to sufficiently It manage and enforce THE HUNDREDS of Contracts With 
 > TLD operators. 
 > 
 > Failure to manage and enforce sufficiently, hundreds of 
 > Contracts with TLD operators. 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 6) Unsuccessful delivery of a stakeholder Proposal and other Relevant 
 > Deliverables for a Successful transition NTIA stewardship of the IANA 
 > Functions. 
 > 
 > Delivery unsuccessfully a proposal from stakeholders and other 
 > Significant deliverables for a successful transition from the NTIA 
 > Supervision of the IANA functions.
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 7) Significant financial loss, other than lower-than-anticipated revenues 
 > (Eg, fraud, investment loss, etc.). 
 > 
 > Significant financial losses, with exception of low income ms 
 > Provided (for example, fraud, loss of investment, etc.). 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 8) Potential for New gTLD Program issues related to accountability 
 >-Mechanisms due to possible adverse decision or failure of mechanism / process. 
 > 
 > Possible problems for the New gTLD Program related 
 > Accountability mechanisms due to possible adverse decision or failure 
 > Mechanism / process. 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 9) Unfunded operational costs or unplanned expenses. 
 > 
 > Operational costs without financiacino unplanned expenses. 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 10) That perception Potential Conflicts of Interests not all are Identified 
 > During decision-making process. 
 > 
 > Perception that not all potential conflicts of interest are 
 > Identified during the process of decision making.
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 11) Possible That perception ICANN has poor overall engagement, transparency, 
 > Policy, coordination and communication. 
 > 
 > Possible perception that ICANN has global commitment, transparency, 
 > Policy, coordinaciny poor communication. 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 12) Significant Increase in legal filings or other dispute resolution That 
 > Could staff capacity challenge, distract and disrupt operations leadership. 
 > 
 > Significant increase in the records of judgments or other 
 > Kind of resolution of disputes will be able to be a challenge for the capacity 
 > Staff, distract leaders and disrupt operations. 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 13) Policy development process is too slow or ineffective, participants 
 > Decrease or stagnate, or failure to bring new stakeholders into the model. 
 > 
 > The process of developing policies is too slow, participants 
 > Diminish or stagnate, or inability to attract new players 
 > Interested in the model.
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 14) Potential legal actions from parties believe That That They Have Been 
 > RESULTING injured from New gTLD Program. 
 > 
 > Potential legal action from parties who believe they have been daadas 
 > As a result of the New gTLD Program. 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 15) Significant revenue reduction (eg, domain name reduced volume, reduced 
 > CcTLD contributions Issue, reduced registration fees, etc.). 
 > 
 > Significant reduction of income (eg volume reduced 
 > Domain name ccTLD contributions reduced, reduced fees 
 > Recorders, etc.). 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 16) Perception of failure and help in Place to Achieve a globa 
 _______________________________________________ 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/7e6f550d81.html
--]]