[lac-discuss-en] ??? Q = utf-8 Nominaci = C3 = B3n_para_ALAC =

[Jacqueline Morris]

Jose, I agree.
Given that the nomination process is still open, I think that discussion of
negative characteristics or previous voting is extremely premature and
prejudicial.
I would hope that any accusations of conflict or any other issues arising
with regard to ANY and ALL candidates would be brought up in the meetings
and list BEFORE the election, and not AFTER, as was recently done, and
which caused so much confusion. The rules are clear as to who is NOT
eligible. Everyone else is eligible, even if they were nominated in a
previous process. As you said, unless the ALS is decertified and the person
is no longer a member. Given that this is not the case for any nominated
candidate so far, I suggest we welcome participation of ALL nominees,
without trying to finagle a disqualification that is not supported by the
rules.
After all, it is a democratic process that we are undergoing, is it not?
And it would be HIGHLY UNFAIR to prejudice this NEW process before it even
begins, wouldn't it? That might even be a matter for the Ombudsman.

Jacqueline

Jacqueline A. Morris
Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and
Free. (after Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> )

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 2:30 PM, <josefranciscoarce at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
>  Subject: Re:??? Q = utf-8 Nominaci = C3 = B3n_para_ALAC =
>  From: josefranciscoarce at gmail.com
>
>  Dear Eduardo,
>  Thank you for your kind email.
>  I tell you my point of view, maybe a little more clarification.
>  Lance has not reached the number of votes and many say they have
>  conflict of interest, not the disabled to be nominated again.
>  To do so, those who believe that Lance has this conflict should
>  you initiate or request a due process being followed to decertify their
> ALS. Only so
>  May not be suitable.
>  I do not think this happens because my view is that all this happened,
>  only in order to be able to apply for another person. But the logic and
>  common sense dictate otherwise.
>  Also remember that many voted positively by., But then was
>  the only candidate. We will now see what happens if there are 3 or more.
> It will put
>  interesting.
>
>
>  I hope I have clarified the picture.
>
>
>  Cheers
>
>
>  Joseph
>  The Aug.20, 2015 24:14, &quot;Eduado Mendez&quot; <eduardo at mendez.net.ve>
> wrote:
>
>
> > Saludos José, espero que estés bien!
> >
> > Tu propuesta me produce una gran interrogante y consiste simplemente en
> > saber si un candidato que no fue considerado positivamente por una parte
> > importante de los miembros de esta lista, pueda ser postulado nuevamente.
> >
> > Un abrazo
> >
> > Eduardo Méndez
> > Internauta Venezuela
> >
> >
> > El 20/08/2015, a las 9:57 a.m., José Francisco Arce <
> > josefranciscoarce at gmail.com> escribió:
> >
> > Estimados,
> >
> > Quiero nominar a Lance Hinds para el cargo de ALAC.
> > Personalmente  creo que posee todas las cualidades para hacer un gran
> > desempeño y la experiencia que se esta buscando.
> > Ademas de que despues de haber pasado por muchos mal entendidos en la
> > unica postulacion anterior, merece estar nuevamente postulado.
> > Manteniendo mi honestidad intelectual.
> >
> > Saludos
> >
> > Jose Arce
> > Amtics
> > _______________________________________________
> > lac-discuss-es mailing list
> > lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
> >
> > http://www.lacralo.org
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> [[--Original text (es)
> http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c94e40c6a3.html
> --]]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-en/attachments/20150820/0d431e16/attachment-0001.html>