[lac-discuss-en] Vote LACRALO on the motion proposed by Alejandro Pisanty

asoto at ibero-americano.org asoto at ibero-americano.org
Tue Aug 18 12:41:25 UTC 2015


[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: Vote LACRALO on the motion proposed by Alejandro Pisanty 
 From: asoto at ibero-americano.org

 Fatima, in principle, the link works properly and that you wish additions can be made. You just have to have made the corresponding login. 


 I extaña that your ending in Dublin two years as ALAC Member, you have not repeated the action you say have done previously, and only we have received repeated public comments to open links. 


 I would also like to clearly indicaras you mean policy debates that were made in the management you're citing. 


 I also support this motion, and I hope that the support is usually to prevent us many spoke in the wheel to advance the policy discussion in our region. Always mencionste that is working on metrics and other issues since 2010.Me like you to tell me that progress was made on this issue.


 I can assure that began after March 2014, and metrics and other important issues have been discussed on the mailing list on the wiki and the third time must be sent to translate their last discussion and send to the vote; we are in 2015. 


 To achieve this we have consensus behind the times, but we value obtaining consensus that the issue of the standard. 


 As I said at the meeting in Buenos Aires, better to ask or prevent, or do nothing, it is to propose a coherent and work on the proposal. 


 Cheers 






 Alberto Soto 










 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of Fatima Cambronero 
 Posted on: Monday, August 17, 2015 11:36 PM 
 To: Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob at gmail.com>
 CC: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] LACRALO vote on the motion proposed by Alejandro Pisanty






 Humberto, 


 I'm wanting to enter comments in the Wiki you share us, and apparently it is not enabled. I do not know if it's a problem for me or something general in this Wiki. 


 I am sharing my comments below, while this is solved. I appreciate the help to enter comments in the Wiki as we're requesting. 






 (Spanish below) 


 Dear Alan and Albert, 






 I would like to add my comments on this issue. 


 Some time ago, When Dev was member by LACRALO and ALAC With the previous Chair and Secretariat of LACRALO (Jose and Sylvia), Dev and I used to divide the policy issues and we used to present to the RALO the topics and the open policy discussions ALAC at level. After That, the RALO used to choose on Which wants to make policy statements. It's worked for a while When We had a lot of statements from LACRALO. 


 Progressively eliminated Were the policy issues on the agenda of the monthly calls of LACRALO.I They Were Asked again to the schedule included several times (you can checked the records). 


 In My Opinion, the Most Important policy objective to include the issues on the agenda of our teleconferences is to make Informed of LACRALO statements or to make Contributions from the RALO to the statements of the ALAC. In short, make the voices of the Internet end users Representatives from our region are Heard. 


 It has not Been happening at RALO level During the last time. 


 I strongly support the substance of esta motion. Then, we can discuss the details. 






 My two cents. 


 Fatima 














 Dear Alan and Albert, 






 I would like to add my comments on this subject.


 Some time ago, when Dev was a member of LACRALO ALAC, and the previous President and Secretary of LACRALO (Joseph and Sylvia), Dev and I used to divide the policy issues and used to present to the RALO open issues and policy debates ALAC. After that, the RALO decided on what policies comment. This worked for a while when we had several statements LACRALO. 


 Increasingly, policy issues have been eliminated from the agenda of the monthly LACRALO calls. I asked her to again include the many times (you can check the records). 


 In my opinion, the most important objective to include policy issues on the agenda of our teleconferencing is make informed statements from LACRALO or make contributions from the RALO ALAC's statements. In short, make the voices of representatives of end users in our region are heard. 


 This is not happening to RALO level in recent times. 


 I strongly support the substance of this motion.Then we can discuss the details. 






 My two cents. 


 Fatima 






 The August 17, 2015, 19:45, Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob at gmail.com <mailto:hcarrascob at gmail.com> &gt; He wrote: 


 Dear, 


 Here is the link of the proposal: 


 https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=54692654 


 We decided to add two more days to comment before starting the voting process. 


 Cheers 
 _______________________________________________ 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/6c4627c42e.html
--]]




More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list