[lac-discuss-en] Vote LACRALO on the motion proposed by Alejandro Pisanty

[fatimacambronero at gmail.com]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: Vote LACRALO on the motion proposed by Alejandro Pisanty 
 From: fatimacambronero at gmail.com

 Humberto, 


 I'm wanting to enter comments in the Wiki you share us, and 
 apparently it is not enabled. I do not know if my problem 
 or something general part of this Wiki. 
 I am sharing my comments below, while this is solved. 
 I appreciate the help to enter comments in the Wiki as we're 
 requesting. 




 (Spanish below) 


 Dear Alan and Albert, 






 I would like to add my comments on this issue. 


 Some time ago, When Dev was member by LACRALO and ALAC With the previous 
 Chair and Secretariat of LACRALO (Jose and Sylvia), Dev and I used to 
 divides the policy issues and we used to present to the RALO the topics and 
 open discussions at the policy level ALAC.After That, the RALO used to 
 Which decides on policy wants to make statements. It's worked for a while 
 When we had a lot of statements from LACRALO. 


 Progressively eliminated Were the policy issues on the agenda of the 
 monthly calls of LACRALO. I They Were Asked again to the schedule included 
 several times (you can checked the records). 


 In My Opinion, the Most Important objective to include the policy issues on 
 the schedule of teleconferences is to make our statements of LACRALO Informed 
 or to make Contributions from the RALO to the statements of the ALAC. In 
 short, make the voices of the Internet Representatives from our end users 
 Heard region are. 


 It has not Been happening at RALO level During the last time. 


 I strongly support the substance of esta motion. Then, we can discuss the 
 details. 






 My two cents. 


 Fatima 










 Dear Alan and Albert, 






 I would like to add my comments on this subject. 


 Some time ago, when Dev was a member of LACRALO ALAC, and the 
 Previous President and Secretary of LACRALO (Joseph and Sylvia), Dev and I 
 We used to divide the policy issues and used to present to the RALO 
 open issues and policy debates in ALAC. After that, the RALO 
 decided on what policies comment. This worked for 
 time when we had several statements of LACRALO. 


 Increasingly, policy issues have been phased out of the 
 agenda calls monthly LACRALO. I asked her to the back 
 including many times (you can check the logs). 


 In my opinion, the most important goal of including issues 
 policies on the agenda of our teleconferencing is make statements 
 LACRALO or make informed from contributions from the RALO 
 ALAC statements. In short, make the voices of 
 representatives of end users in our region are 
 heard.


 This is not happening to RALO level in recent times. 


 I strongly support the substance of this motion. Then we can discuss 
 the details. 






 My two cents. 


 Fatima 


 The August 17, 2015, 19:45, Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob at gmail.com>
 wrote: 


> Estimados,
>
> Aquí tienen el enlace de la propuesta:
>
> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=54692654
>
> Decidimos agregar dos días más para comentarios antes de iniciar el
> proceso de votación.
>
> Saludos
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-es mailing list
> lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>
> http://www.lacralo.org
>






 * Fatima Cambronero * 
 Lawyer 
 Argentina / Mexico 


 Phone: Argentina: +54 9351 5282 668 - Mexico: +52 (55) 3018 2066 
 Twitter:facambronero 
 Skype: fatima.cambronero 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/aa3775d548.html
--]]