[lac-discuss-en] Reflections on the ELA standards and expectations Taskforce
asoto at ibero-americano.org
asoto at ibero-americano.org
Sun Aug 9 00:03:14 UTC 2015
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: Reflections on the ELA standards and expectations Taskforce
From: asoto at ibero-americano.org
Dear Carlton, the issue of apologies had been talked ever
while in a meeting of ALAC, and why he was being treated in
LACRALO and perhaps there will cite the folly but as a
collaboration. It is discutiy quit.
Also, when you plantequitarlo, he was removed. Nevertheless it is the
third time I ests citing as an example.
Perhaps the improvement of language in meetings and lists, are other
valuable tool for greater participation. Inappropriate language,
or rude or insulting, is a ground for withdrawal of members.
Cheers
Alberto
-----Original Message-----
From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of
carlton.samuels at gmail.com
Posted on: saturday, August 8, 2015 8:41 pm
To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
CC: LACRALO-EN <lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org> ; ALAC
<alac at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Reflections on the ELA standards and
Taskforce expectations
[[Translated text (en -> en) -]]
Subject: Re: Reflections on the ELA standards and expectations Taskforce
From: carlton.samuels at gmail.com
1.
The challenge estajustando the structural basis of the At-Large
participation in ICANN and perceptions of desempeo. That will be difficult,
at best.
More to the point, we are not seeing the kind of innovative thinking about
performance metrics that will do what you and I see as the value of
come out on top.
Case in point.We had a recent situation where I was in LACRALO
seriously proposed that if one sends an apology for the lack of assistance
- * NOTE either purely not attend * - a meeting online, to be
counted as participation!
And, some ignorant boy claimed offense if one were to reflexively
say aloud that the notion expressed offends even the idea of \u200b\u200bsense
common than it is stupid.
-Carlton
==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
* Strategy Planning on, Government, evaluation and delivery *
=============================
On Saturday, August 8, 2015 at 2:37 AM Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
<ocl at gih.com>
wrote:
> Dear Alan,
>
> agreed on all your other points.
>
> On 08/08/2015 00:58, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> >
> > 3. The latter ones come to meetings, perhaps attend some meetings,
> > enjoy the local offerings, and go home and forget about us until the
> > next trip. THOSE are the ones that I have a real problem with.
>
> And unfortunately whenever the time comes for having face to face
> meetings, we treat those people the same way as we treat the people
> who genuinely want to get involved. It is impossible to build a
> relationship with people who do not make the effort to keep involved
> in between face to face meetingsMy argument is that we should identify
> people who have a genuine interest in helping out and facilitate their
> involvement in face to face meetings, more often than at GAs every 5
> So far, what I have done is to give excellent references to people
> applying for the fellowship program and whom I judge to be of real
> potential. But that's not enough since the program is only available
> for developing nations.
> This is why I would favour the ability for the ALAC to invite people
> from their ALSes to an ICANN meeting, based on a skill requirement.
> For example, the hot topic is about WHOIS, let's invite people whom we
> know to be privacy experts. The hot topic is about ICANN
> Accountability - let's invite people who run an ALS that has a need to
> impeccable accountability. etc.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Olivier
>
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/05a0e01185.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list