[lac-discuss-en] = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????

Mon Aug 3 13:18:26 UTC 2015

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ????? 
 From: asoto at ibero-americano.org

 Dear Jacqueline, which meant Alexander, is that representatives of LACRALO must defend the views of our Region. Not to impose it, explain it. It is known that there may be differences of opinion on a particular issue, there will be a vote, then they may act accordingly. 
 As all applicants stated in their presentation, are representatives of our region. 
 Best regards 
 Alberto Soto 

 On August 3, 2015 10:01:31 GMT-03: 00, jam at jacquelinemorris.com wrote: 
 > 
 > [[- Translated text (en -&gt; en) -]] 
 > 
 > Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = 
 > UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ????? 
> De: jam at jacquelinemorris.com
>
>Como usted insiste, por supuesto, esto se transmitirï¿½ como relevantes. 
> Por desgracia, que es un grupo de trabajo de TODOS RALOs y no sï¿½lo 
>LACRALO, no puedo decir que el resto del grupo estarï¿½ de acuerdo con la
>
>Mirador LACRALO. Esto es, despuï¿½s de todo, un grupo de trabajo para
>crear criterios para ser 
> aplicado a nivel mundial. 
>Y, por supuesto, estoy encantado de que otros miembros de LACRALO serï¿½n
>
> participar y seguir el trabajo. 
> Jacqueline 
> El 02 de agosto 2015 23:15, <jumaropi at yahoo.com> escribiï¿½: 
> > 
>> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>>
>>  Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = -
>= =
>> UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????
>>  From: jumaropi at yahoo.com
>>
>>  Alejandro thanks for that reminder. We will be watching.
>>  We insist on it.
>>  Cordially
>>
>>
>>  Sent from my Huawei Mobile
>>
>>
>>  Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty at gmail.com> wrote:
>>  > Juan Manuel, answered with a copy to the list, because your
>question is
>> relevant to the community:
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > June 24 I expressed what I reproduce below. In the course of 24
>hours
>> (25 June) we met the consensus of Carlton Samuels, Jacqueline Morris,
>> Sergio Salinas, and several others. Goes:
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > "Today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion
>on
>> metrics.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, I
>> think it worthwhile to make clear what the objective metrics.This is
>well
>> understood in the community, and those who say they do not
>self-interest to
>> distort the discussion.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > What we need is accountability and transparency among ourselves.
>> Individuals and organizations working activametne must be identified.
>> Organizations and individuals that do not contribute or participate
>must
>> decide whether they will participate or no longer counted. And
>there's a
>> middle ground and representatives of organizations who find it
>difficult to
>> participate but have the will to do so. Among these there are many
>types of
>> situations: a representative who is sick or has to spend time with
>family
>> or work that sustains; a policy change or mandate; and many more
>> circumstances.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable,
>and
>> difficult to counterfeit.Would make a "triage", ie, would quite clear
>what
>> organizations 5-10 regularly participate and contribute, the 20 that
>are
>> practically abandoned, and an intermediate strip of 10 or 15 with
>which we
>> must work in hopes that recover their participation or leave the
>> organization voluntarily or by way of the decertification. This
>assumes
>> cycles of renewal of certificates, which must institute.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > There is a classification of units that can help us further in
>this
>> process:
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities and
>> contribution to substantive policy issues. Their proposals are
>incorporated
>> in resolutions of LACRALO and impact on policies and ICANN ALAC.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > 2. sporadic participation and / or dedicated to issues Reglaments
>> procedure formats agreements but not their contents, etc.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > 3.sporadic, little focus, and fundamentally conducive to "make
>> presence" for elections and selection processes for equity
>participation in
>> events, especially if they involve support for travel.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations
>should
>> encourage the Type 1, Type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who
>make
>> equity type 2 pass to level 1.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working
>Group
>> Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good implementation and
>their
>> work will be more reliable, predictable and achievable. "
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > Best regards,
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > Alejandro Pisanty
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > 08.02.2015 20:28 GMT-05: 00 Juan Manuel Rojas <jumaropi at yahoo.com>
>:
>>  >
>>  > Thank you Alexander. We take those concerns before. TF. It
>considered
>> helpful to have clarity on the points that you mean specifically.
>>  >
>>  > Sent from my Huawei Mobile
>>  >
>>  > Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty at gmail.com> wrote:
>>  >
>>  > Jacqueline, Juan Manuel, all,
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > The regional point of view has been expressed in the consensus
>that we
>> out of the meeting in Buenos Aires, with general criteria for ALS
>reached
>> consensus and are of great strength and general validity.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > I hope these guidelines define what they will do our
>representatives.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > Alejandro Pisanty
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 3:12 PM, <jam at jacquelinemorris.com> wrote:
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > [[- Translated text (en -> en) -]]
>>  >
>>  > Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N =
>- =
>> = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????
>>  > From: jam at jacquelinemorris.com
>>  >
>>  > Thank you. I will do my best to represent the region in the
>>  > WG.
>>  > Jacqueline
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > Jacqueline A. Morris
>>  > Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, necessary,
>invisible,
>>  > Free.(After Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> )
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > The Sun, August 2, 2015 at 12:29 PM <asoto at ibero-americano.org>
>wrote:
>>  >>
>>  >> [[Translated text (es -> en) -]]
>>  >>
>>  >> ??? Subject: = utf-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N
>= - =
>> =
>>  >> Utf-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????
>>  >> From: asoto at ibero-americano.org
>>  >>
>>  >> Dear, on This issue we Have had four nominations. ACCORDING to
>the
>> above
>>  >> Opportunely criteria, They Have Been selected:
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >> Jacqueline Morris
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >> - Juan Manuel Rojas
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >> We Know That esta WG will have a hard work, and the first meeting
>will
>> be
>>  >> Tomorrow August 3rd. I will notify Juan Manuel Jacqueline and
>schedule
>> the
>>  >> Meeting.
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >> Best regards
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >> Alberto Soto
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >> ---
>>  Avast antivirus software >> esta email scanned for viruses.
>>  >> Http://www.avast.com
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/36215296b9.html
--]]