[lac-discuss-en] [lac-discuss-es] FW: [ALAC-Announce] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Draft Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization

Mon Aug 3 03:43:15 UTC 2015

Vanda, coincido con Alejandro. Además coincido con una observación hecha por Olivier Crepin-Leblond:

“For example, recommendation #23, approving new GNSO Constituencies. (and other new GNSO Constituency recommendations)

I am concerned about the creation of more Constituencies, all of which might probably end up in the Non-Contracted Party House, thus further fragmenting the Non-Contracted Party House and increasing tension between Constituencies. We all know about the tension between NCUC and NPOC. Having more Consituencies might only continue to strengthen the Contracted Party House since their vote will be more homogeneous and they will be able to "pick and mix" within the Non-Contracted Party House in order to obtain a majority.

Finally, I am very concerned that none of the recommendations address the wider malaise about the balance of power in the GNSO and the potential for capture caused by a fragmented Non-Contracted Party House and a solid Contracted Party House. We keep on hearing "the GNSO is broken and needs to be reformed" and yet there is not one line in the report that actually investigates the validity of this assertion. I see this as an opportunity missed.”

Las diferencias entre NCUC y NPOC cada vez son mas notorias,y realmente incrementar esto, sería arriesgado. Y no corregirlo, una oportunidad perdida.

Saludos cordiales

Alberto Soto

De: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de Alejandro Pisanty
Enviado el: domingo, 02 de agosto de 2015 09:40 p.m.
Para: Vanda Scartezini <vanda at etges.com.br>
CC: LACRALO list <lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org>; lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] FW: [ALAC-Announce] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Draft Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization

Vanda,

las fallas del informe, hasta donde he podido identificarlas, son importantes. Tengamos el valor de votar en contra y hagamos que el trabajo sea bien terminado.

Alejandro Pisanty

On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Vanda Scartezini <vanda at etges.com.br <mailto:vanda at etges.com.br> > wrote:

Dear all, 

 A vote is calling in ALAC on the propose of ratification of the ALAC draft statement on GNSO review ( see email below) , some of us just contribute. 

 I need to vote till next Thursday. Please, if someone has any position against please not posted on public comment that will demand a change on my vote, please make it public.

If none I intend to vote in favor though I personally believe, and had made such statement, that the review itself was really weak and did not touch several relevant points.  Due the huge involvement of GNSO on the new gTLDs during such review I believe the time frame was not opportune. For the same reason I was in favor to postpone ALAC review to leave IANA stewardship transition to finish and we could pay all our attention on such  review. 

Appreciate any feedback.

Vanda Scartezini

Polo Consultores Associados

Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004

01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253

Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 

Sorry for any typos. 

From: <alac-announce-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:alac-announce-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> > on behalf of ICANN Staff
Reply-To: ICANN Staff
Date: Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 09:00
To: "alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org> "
Subject: [ALAC-Announce] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Draft Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization

Dear All, 

Alan Greenberg, Chair of the ALAC, has asked that a vote be held by the ALAC on the proposed ratification of a draft ALAC Statement in response to a public comment request. Please note that only the 15 ALAC members will cast votes in this poll.  

*****

Question: Do you support the ratification of the "ALAC Statement on the Draft Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization <https://community.icann.org/x/35U0Aw> " for the communication to relevant parties?

*****

Please note that the poll will be open from 01-August-2015 12:00 UTC to 06-August-2015 12:00 UTC.

Regards,

Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew

ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC

E-mail: staff at atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org> 

Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> atlarge <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> 

Twitter: @ <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> ICANNAtLarge <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> 

_______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC-Announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org>  https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org

_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-es mailing list
lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org> 
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es

http://www.lacralo.org

-- 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
Facultad de Química UNAM
Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
+525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .

---
El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-en/attachments/20150803/7d828820/attachment.html>