[lac-discuss-en] ? = Iso-8859-1 q = Re_ = 26quot F3n_de_do == 3BIntroducci = iso-8859-1 == q s_caracteres_de_nombres_de_dominio_en_el_Nuevo_gTLD_Namesp iso-8859-1 q = ace = 26quot???? 3B_Los_comentarios_del_p = FAblico? =

apisan at unam.mx apisan at unam.mx
Sat Jul 12 11:37:20 UTC 2014


[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re:? = Iso-8859-1 q = Re_ = 26quot F3n_de_do == 3BIntroducci = iso-8859-1 == q s_caracteres_de_nombres_de_dominio_en_el_Nuevo_gTLD_Namesp iso-8859-1 q = ace = 26quot???? 3B_Los_comentarios_del_p = FAblico? = 
 From: apisan at unam.mx

 Dev 


 thanks for this valuable information. 


 The World of the initial two letters is msmvil what is often thought; and changes are momentous, when present. 


 Therefore this issue should interest those LACRALO colleagues who have given importance to territorial issues. Slo your serposible our community initiative undertake something in the subject. 


 Alejandro Pisanty 




 --------------------------- 
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty 
 UNAM Faculty of Chemistry 
 3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico 






 +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD


 SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 FROM MEXICO 
 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com 
 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty 
 Join the LinkedIn group UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty 
 ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org 
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 


 ________________________________________ 
 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of devtee at gmail.com [devtee at gmail.com] 
 Posted on: Friday, July 11, 2014 7:59 
 To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 CC: LACRALO discussion list 
 Subject: Re: Re "Introduction of two-character domain names in the new gTLD Namespace" Comments from the public 


 [[- Translated text (en -> en) -]] 


 Subject: Re: Re "Introduction of two-character domain names in the new gTLD Namespace" Comments from the public 
 From: devtee at gmail.com


 Well, there may be only a fixed number of permutations (676) for possible 
 used in ISO 3166 from ISO 3166 can only be ASCII letters AA to ZZ. And 
 While it may not be a fast number of changes, there have been changes 
 ISO 3166 in the last 10 years. 




 For example, in 2010, for example: 
 http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_3166-1_newsletter_vi-8_split_of_the_dutch_antilles_final-en.pdf 




 BQ, CW and SX aadieron for Bonaire, St. Eustatius and Saba, Curaao 
 and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) in the Caribbean. 




 Dev Anand 




















 On Thursday, July 10, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels at gmail.com>
 I wrote: 




> Closely reasoned and from the principle of cc assignment certainly worthy
> of the ALAC's consideration.
>
> While we're at it, lets consider that 3-character country codes are
> possible.
>
> Giving protection for a future event suggests we have a definite knowledge
> of country/territory breakdown and thusly, possible code assignment.  Tying
> up all permutations of 2 characters especially when you consider IDNs would
> be a tough sell.
>
> Carlton
> ---------'--------''-----
>
> On Jul 10, 2014 2:04 AM, "Dev Anand Teelucksingh" <devtee at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Regarding the public comment on "Introduction of Two-Character Domain
> Names
> > in the New gTLD Namespace" at https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg
> > which ends July 10 2014, I've posted the following at
> > https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg
> > for consideration:
> >
> > "Various registries for multiple gTLDs are applying for exceptions to
> > Specification 5, Section 2 of the New gTLD Registry Agreement
> > ("Specification 5") with some registries suggesting the release of 2
> > character ASCII labels not on the current ISO 3166 standard would
> suffice.
> >
> > While this seems harmless, there is a possibility of new countries and
> > territories being created, and then allocated a new two character ASCII
> > label by ISO 3166/MA (see
> >
> https://web.archive.org/web/20111101141651/http://www.iso.org/iso/country_codes/iso-3166-1_decoding_table.htm
> > ).
> >
> > Any new country or territory created after 2014 would therefore not
> receive
> > the same protection as those in the 2014 ISO 3166-2 list and would find
> > that their new 2 character label is "given away", should they wish for
> > their 2 character ASCII label to be protected, as per Specification 5.
> >
> > Now, should the principle established by Specification 5 protecting 2
> > character ASCII labels even be in the New gTLD Registry Agreement? Many
> > would say, especially given the prevalence of two character labels in
> > existing TLDs like .com, .org and .net that this principle shouldn't be
> > applied to new gTLDs.
> > However, this (IMO) is a separate issue to the question being asked for
> in
> > the public comment.
> >
> > If Specification 5 is meant to defend the principle that country codes in
> > ISO 3166-2 should be protected in new gTLDs, then it should be enforced
> to
> > ensure future countries and territories with new 2 character ASCII labels
> > are protected in the same way as those territories and countries in
> today's
> > ISO 3166-2 list.
> >
> > Therefore, the proposals by Donuts for 143 of its new gTLDS, .kred by
> > KredTLD Pty Ltd, .best by BestTLD Pty Ltd and .ceo by CEOTLD Pty Ltd.
> > should be turned down in keeping with the principle of Specification 5.
> >
> > The proposal by .wiki by Top Level Design LLC which specifies that the
> two
> > character ASCII labels will only be used for languages identified by ISO
> > 639-1 does appear to meet the threshold that the use will not be confused
> > with the corresponding country codes, as per Specification 5 and could be
> > approved.
> >
> > Similarly, the proposal by .globo by Globo Comunicação e Participações
> S.A
> > which proposed the use of two character ASCII labels that are not letters
> > or by two characters where only one of the character is a letter are
> labels
> > that would not be used by ISO 3166-2 and could be approved."
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> >
> > Dev Anand Teelucksingh
> > _______________________________________________
> > lac-discuss-en mailing list
> > lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>
>
 lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en 









[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b2683cd3a9.html
--]]




More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list