[lac-discuss-en] ? = Utf-8 q Protection = C3 = 2C == B3n_de_datos_personales = utf-8 q = _Privacy???

Carlton Samuels carlton.samuels at gmail.com
Thu Jun 12 23:08:07 UTC 2014


Excellent analysis!

Carlton
On Jun 12, 2014 4:07 PM, <javierjosepallero at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
>  Subject: Re:? = Utf-8 q Protection = C3 = 2C == B3n_de_datos_personales =
> utf-8 q = _Privacy???
>  From: javierjosepallero at gmail.com
>
>  This is interesting since in Argentina Alberto, for example, can be
>  access the name, Tax ID number, ID and any data delegacin
>  registrant  https://nic.ar/busqueda-dominio-no-disponible.xhtml
>
>
>  In the old system the direccinfsica pruning found that registrtbNL&gt;
> too. But also with the data found in the search that
>  It is not difficult to figure out.
>
>
>  There are certain details (name, national identity, identification
>  tax or social security, occupation, date of birth and address) that
>  Argentina can treat the law without obtaining the consent of the owner,
>  hacindolos &quot;free circulation&quot;. They are showing nic.ar And
>  Sometimes these data are too (when mxime now gives the analysis of
>  metadata extracted information more allde what explcito)
>
>
>  Our law (and to my knowledge, several in the region) followed
>  European Directive 95/46/EC and an effective reform process. But
>  least in the case of Argentina missing something that the European
> directive Stiene:
>  express references to principles of proportionality. Not only is
>  qudatos podrn being trafficked freely, but how much is needed
>  to fulfill the purposes of registration.
>
>
>  In what concerns us, it is the proportionality in the data
>  shown and its utility for the public record holders
>  pas domains point. Efecturar be interesting and a good survey
>  establish some principles for assessing how managers
>  ccTLDs in the region treated (ycmo MUST try) data
>  ownership.
>
>
>  Finally, in the uk the European Directive does not apply, and almost
>  as in USA, laissez faire holds the reins. It also serves to
>  these questions that come to mind for the region.
>
>
>  Greetings.
>
>
>  Javier J.Pallero
>  http://about.me/javierpallero <http://www.linkedin.com/in/javierpallero>
>
>
>
>
>  The June 12, 2014, 11:15 AM, Alberto Soto <asoto at ibero-americano.org>
>  wrote:
>
>
> > Este es un tema también importante para estudiar, y es técnico legal y no
> > técnico informático. El administrador del dominio .uk , a diferencia de
> la
> > generalidad del mundo, abre más datos personales atodos, mejor dicho a
> > cualquiera.
> >
> > Saludos cordiales
> >
> >
> >
> > Alberto Soto
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/11/nominet-new-rules-uk-domai
> > n-end-privacy
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lac-discuss-es mailing list
> > lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
> >
> > http://www.lacralo.org
> >
>
>
>
> [[--Original text (es)
> http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/5d3c72c997.html
> --]]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>
>


More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list