[lac-discuss-en] Regarding the Amazon domain.

[Carlton Samuels]

Should we say - "a Daniel has come to judgment"?  Because we already know
any decision here will and must be purely political.

After all the 'one the one hand...on the other hand' details, the learned
Professor has come to what we knew going in: the AGB does not deter the
string being assigned, international IP law does not forbid it and the
principle of territoriality (which some of us used to argue for local
trademarks to be acknowledged and respected in the Trademark Clearing House
concept and was rejected by the community) is not a basis for string
assignment in the gTLD.

-Carlton


==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
*Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
=============================


On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:49 PM, <hcarrascob at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
>  Subject: Regarding the Amazon domain.
>  From: hcarrascob at gmail.com
>
>  Dear,
>
>
>  As it is of interest to many LACRALO aquencontrarn a link to a report
> about the situation right domain Amazon.:
>
>
>
> http://www.icann.org/en/news/correspondence/crocker-to-dryden-07apr14-en.pdf
>
>
>  This report concludes that:
>
>
>  i) there is no rule of international, regional or national law applicable
> in the field of geogrficas indications requiring ICANN to reject the
> application;
>  ii) there is no rule of international, regional or national law
> applicable intellectual property and in particular brands or in the field
> of fundamental rights, requiring ICANN to accept this request.
>
>
>  Attentive to your comments.
>
>
>  Regards
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> [[--Original text (es)
> http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/8893e0c72a.html
> --]]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>