[lac-discuss-en] R: VOTE RESULTS: 2014 Director-At-Large Board (Seat # 15) Selection Process
vanda at uol.com.br
vanda at uol.com.br
Tue Apr 1 17:54:22 UTC 2014
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: R: VOTE RESULTS: 2014 Director-At-Large Board (Seat # 15) Selection Process
From: vanda at uol.com.br
Roberto,
I totally agree with you, having Been ALAC liaison Also at the Board. It
is time to really rethink The entire model. I have some exchange being
Ideas With Other former board members and would love to exercise some
thoughts with you too. I believe AT Large has a great opportunity at ATLAS to
present some good alternatives for ICANN model in the near future.
Hope to count on Wolfgang ideas, too, always bringing relevant suggestions.
All the best to all
Vanda Scartezini
Polo Consultores Associados
Av Paulista 1159, 1004 cj
01311-200 - Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
On 04.01.14, 14:19, "Roberto Gaetano" <roberto_gaetano at hotmail.com> wrote:
> I have been one of the champions of the ALAC representation to the Board
> With voting Directors, on par With the other supporting Organizations.
> So I believe That I can not be Suspected of anti-ALAC-ism if I now, years
> Later, argue That to fight for more Directors on the Board is a battle of
> The past, That has little meaning looking at the evolution of the
> Organizazion and at a full realization of the multi-stakeholder model.
> The multi-stakeholder model is not a model where the parliamentarian
> Will get stakeholder representation based on Their relative "strength".
> The parliamentarian scheme is OK for an organization in its infancy,
> Where the constitution has to be Drafted. In a mature organization, With
> Basic laws and Behaviours already defined, the appointment of
> Representatives by constituencies in the Board Brings Inevitably the
> Petty interests of the different constituencies instead of having to sort
> Of the council of elders That abstracts from the contingent interests
> Looking for the common good.
> This has-been the guideline That was Attempted With the GNSO Review,
> Albeit with only partial, although significant, results.
> It is time to propose a different model for the Board as well, to get rid
> As much as possible of the system by Which info we have representative of
> "Parties" that have conflicting interests Often.
> I Believe That We Should go towards Reducing the SO-appointed Directors,
> And Have a larger share instead, possibly a super-majority, appointed by
> NomCom. The NomCom Should Also get a description of the skill sets September
> That is notably missing for That year, so That They can choose the
> Names accordingly.
> Cheers,
> Roberto
>
>
>
----- Messaggio originale ----- >>
Da >>: euro-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: discuss-euro-
Bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org >>] Per conto di Sivasubramanian M
>> Inviato: domenica 30 March 2014 18:27
>> A: Kleinwchter, Wolfgang
>> Cc: lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org, lac-discuss-es @ atlarge-
Lists.icann.org >>; euro-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org;
African-discuss >> @ atlarge-
Lists.icann.org >>; Announcements At-Large; APRALO, At-Large Worldwide, na-
Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org >>
>> Oggetto: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014
At-Large Board >> Manager (Seat # 15) Selection Process
>>
>> Dear Wolfgang,
>>
The original idea >> of nine Directors Voting was possibly conceived to
Ensure >> an
>> Independent, user driven organization. NomCom was a good idea but in
The >>
At-Large process >> lost the seats in the Board, in exchange for shared
Responsibility >> in the selection process.
>>
A better representation >> for At-Large, as originally envisaged, would
Positively >>
ICANN Governance >> Demonstrate That is emphatically based on the multi-
Stakeholder model of Governance >>.
>>
In the recent >> At-Large elections, info we have had an incumbent and Effective
Four other qualified candidates >>, que goes on to prove That At-Large
Has >>
>> Matured, people sufficiently It has qualified for Board positions. As you
Have >>
Mentioned >>, info we have the GNSO user communities with qualified people,
Which >> Increases the the number of available qualified candidates even
More >>.
In this context >>, if we revisit the discussions on more Board seats
Which would >>
ICANN's >> reaffirm faith in the multi-stakeholder model. Other
Stakeholders >>
Might welcome >> Such a discussion to Improve user participation in the
>> Board,
Essentially would >> porque Improve Trust in the ICANN process.
>>
Candidates >> More from At-Large Board positions to be appointed by Could
Two >>
Processes >> different:
>>
>> 1) By the Existing process whereby the AC selects / Elects a candidate
And >>
>> The chosen person is appointed. This introduce an election Which Could
Sometimes create >> Differences, though Such Differences do not exist
Within >>
AC >> this at the moment.
>>
>> 2) By a process completely free of the Internal elections, by an
Internal >>
NomCom >>. (Initial thoughts, there are various ways of designing Such a
>> Process, there are advantages and disadvantages to be Considered)
>>
Thank >> you.
>>
Sivasubramanian M >>
India >>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:32 PM, "Kleinwchter, Wolfgang" <
Wolfgang.kleinwaechter >> @ medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to
Rinalia >>> (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done).Nothing
To add more >>> what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured.
>>>
I this >>> context: Dont forget the History. In the present NTIA
Transition >>> a lot of discussion "orginal ideas," from 1998 are
>>> Remembered. One orginal thought was to give the nine At Large Membership
>>> Voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Bylaws Orginal (November 6,
>>> 1998) said in for. iv: "Nine
>>> (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be
Established by a >>> majority vote of all the members of the At Large Board
The >>
>> Initial Board ".
Http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98- >>>
# >> En.htm
V >>>
>>>
We >>> know the history. ELECTED Were Five directors voting in 2000 for
Two >>> years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee,
Chaired >>
>>> By Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting
Organisation >>>
>>> (ALSO) With the right to send six voting directors to the board.
>>>
Http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.h >>>
Tm >>> # _toc523422641
>>>
>>> In 2002, as part of the overall reform process ICANN the thoughts of an
>>> At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional
Were Abolished and councils >>> Were Substituted by an "At Large Advisory
Committee >> "
>>> (ALAC) WITH five RALOs, a certification process for ALS and the
Establishment of a setName >>> Which now sends eight directors to the
>>> Board. The NomCom got five voting Members At Large. The chair of ALAC
Was invited to serve >>> as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to
>>> The chair of the GAC).
>>>
In the preparation for >>> ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we where calling for
ALAC >>> two Board members voting. We got one. Now at the ATLAS II is
>>> Horizon.We need a strong message from ATLAS II That the
Multistakeholder model >>> - which is now under discussion and have tough
>>> To face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong
Civil society >>> role in policy development and decision making.
>>>
Here >>> info we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos
Both >>> Within the Broader CS community (in particular, with NCUC and
NPOC >>>) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and
Collaboration with >>
>>> Private sector technical community and Governments. A big
>> Challenge. [ERROR: Sentence too long to translate (1916> 1800 bytes)] We all continue building on our previous experiences, so
This process >>> Should be a continuous exercise and include Those who can
>>> Learn from us - so, I am sure Sebastian will find good ways to share
The wealth of expertise >>> Gained in his role as a Board member and
Continue >>> serve the community in the best possible ways.
>>>
>>> - Congratulate Rinalia * for * being ELECTED to the Board and wish her
In this much luck >>> interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are
Important times for ICANN >>> Which will require several key competences,
>>> And awareness of geo-political realities in different parts of the
World >>>. I will be able Rinalia trust to deliver on the expectations on
The >>
>> Community-at-large.
>>>
>>> - * Roberto * Thank for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has
>>> Been For me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience
There are >>> always things to learn from and based on the input Improve
From >>
>> Members.
>>>
On this >>> note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home
>>> Safe & sound, Otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home!
>>>
With >>> very best,
Veronica >>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
>>> <ocl at gih.com
>>>> Wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear All,
>>>>
I >>>> wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what
Was a very balanced >>>> That election required many rounds to
>>>> Differentiate the candidates.
>>>>
Rinalia >>>> has-been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a
Moment >>>> That is not only crucial for At-Large But Also crucial for
ICANN >>>> as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual
General Meeting >>>> - the last meeting of the year - which will take
>>>> Place in Los Angeles.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to all of the candidates Who Have run for the position. It is
Through a wide >>>> That candidate list we can a wider choice of ECOG
>>>> Options for the future of our community.
>>>>
Thanks to Roberto Gaetano >>>> and the Candidate Evaluation Board
>> Committee.
Their work >>>> has-been crucial in providing a first class short-list of
>>>> Candidates.
>>>>
Thanks >>>> to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process
Committee for >>>> Their stewardship of a process That has-been
>>>> Challenging due to the multiple instances of Ties.
>>>>
The >>>> of These Committees work is not over. They will analyze lessons
Learnt >>>> and work together to Provide the ALAC With An updated set of
Improve >>>> recommendations to the selection process next time around.
>>>>
>>>> Finally, I would like to remind you That ICANN until the 2014 AGM,
Board Member >>>> selected by the At-Large and is Sbastien Bachollet
>>>> Would like to reaffirm the full support of our community in the
Challenging >>>> months ahead of us.We are well aware That I is not on
>>>> The Board to "represent us" but as a candidate from our community
Selected >>>> to the Board by our community, has proven himself to have
Share his experience of >>>> Internet End Users With His Colleagues Board
And we are grateful >>>> of his continued Involvement in all matters of
ICANN >>.
>>>>
>>>> Kindest regards,
>>>>
Olivier >>>> MJ Crpin-Leblond
ALAC Chair >>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 03/26/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote:
>>>>> Dear All,
>>>>>
>>>>> Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process
Committee >>>>>
>>>> (BMSPC) 2014 That has asked an announcement on the end vote
Results of the Board >>>> Manager (Seat # 15) selected by the
>>>> ALAC / At-Large for 2015-2017 (to take Their seat at the 2014 AGM) be
>> Published.
>>>>>
This is to inform >>>>> You That the 2014 Director-At-Large Board (Seat
# >>>>> 15)
Selection Process >>>> was completed on 25-March-2014.
>>>>>
Below is the >>>>> list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of
The >>>>>
>>>> Family name) who ran for the position:
>>>>>
* Abdul Rahim Rinalia >>>>>
* Sbastien Bachollet >>>>>
* Alan Greenberg >>>>>
* Evan Leibovitch >>>>>
* Jean-Jacques >>>>> Subrenat
>>>>>
After the FIRST ROUND >>>>> VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie
>>>> Breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is
Board >>>> selected as the director (Seat # 15) by ALAC / At-Large for
2015-2017 >>>> is: Rinalia Abdul Rahim.
>>>>>
You May >>>>> review the results, as well as the detailed information
Acerca >>>>>
The >>>> selection procedure, under:
>> https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
Heidi Ullrich >>>>> Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber,
Nathalie >>>>>
Peregrine and Terri Agnew >>>>
ICANN Policy Staff >>>>> in support of ALAC
>>>>> E-mail: <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org%
3cmailto >>>: staff at atlarge.icann.org>
Staff at atlarge.icann.org >>>>
>>>>
>>> <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-
B9445B8F305F/Regards >>,% 20Heidi%
>>>
20Ullrich >>,%% 20Vivanco 20Silvia,% 20Ashtiani 20Matt%,%% 20Liang 20Ariel,% 20G
20Gruber >>> isella%,%
>>>>
>>>
20Peregrine 20Nathalie% >>% 20and% 20Julia 20ICANN%%% 20Charvolen 20Policy
% 20St >>
Aff >>>% 20in% 20Support% 20of% 20ALACmailto: staff at atlarge.icann.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
_______________________________________________ >>>>>
At-Large >>>>> mailing list
At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org >>>>>
>>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>>>>>
At-Large >>>>> Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org <
Http://atlarge.icann.org/ >>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
_______________________________________________ >>>>
EURO-Discuss mailing >>>> list
EURO-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org >>>>
>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss [ERROR: Sentence too long to translate (2686> 1800 bytes)]
>>>
Homepage >>> for the region: http://www.euralo.org
>>> <http://www.euralo.org/>
>>>
>>>
_______________________________________________ >>>
APAC >>>-Discuss mailing list
APAC-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org >>>
>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss
>>>
Homepage >>> for the region: http://www.apralo.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -
Sivasubramanian Muthusamy >>
India +91 99524 03099 >>
_______________________________________________ >>
>> EURO-Discuss mailing list
EURO-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org >>
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss
>>
Homepage >> for the region: http://www.euralo.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/80e36213a9.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list