[lac-discuss-en] ICANN Board Seat

josefranciscoarce at gmail.com josefranciscoarce at gmail.com
Tue Mar 11 22:39:59 UTC 2014 

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: ICANN Board Seat 
 From: josefranciscoarce at gmail.com

 Dear, 


     To clarify the Cuestin I'm going to say that the reply mail 
 Alan was public and say that I personally am going to consult the region 
 you want to do, maybe the internal discussion of the need for living 
 a call (with one, some or all). 
     Because I told you to consult with is performed several 
 things that led to the erroneous discussion. As I said to Alexander, 
 who wants to hear the region. 
     Alan was the only candidate who was placed in direct contact with 
 LACRALO members, but this does not mean to exclude others in a 
 future exchange of ideas or questions.
     Now, if some of you were on the call of the 
 candidates, that's fine (but not all had that opportunity), 
 but my mission is to try to give equal opportunities to all 
 members and perhaps many of those who did not want that option, I 
 I can not dismiss it. Tomorrow is not with the candidates but to know the 
 criteria that must be the "ideal" candidate. 


     I repeat, we must provide opportunities for all members to access 
 Direct (call) or indirect (mail or wiki) to interact with 
 candidates. It is an important desicin which should and must take LACRALO 
 be based on knowledge and argumentation positions only 
 so the internal debate serel ms right, from my point of view. 


 Regards 


 JosArce -. 










 3/11/2014 18:10 GMT-03: 00 Alan Greenberg <greenberg.alan at gmail.com> : 


> To be clear, I was not asking for a teleconference. In a discussion with
> José Arce, José suggested that I tell LACRALO members about me, and that is
> why I sent the message.
>
> Google Traductor: Para que quede claro, yo no estaba pidiendo una
> teleconferencia. En una discusión con José Arce, José sugirió que le digo a
> los miembros de LACRALO sobre mí, y es por eso que envié el mensaje.
>
> Alan
>
>
> At 11/03/2014 04:17 PM, Fatima Cambronero wrote:
>
>> José, todos,
>>
>> Yo no estoy entendiendo muy bien qué es lo que se está planteando, lo que
>> me lleva a hacerme varias preguntas:
>> ¿Por qué tendríamos una llamada sólo con Alan, que es uno de los
>> candidatos, y no con los otros cuatro candidatos?
>> ¿Por qué necesitamos una llamada adicional con un candidato, cuando ya
>> hubo
>> una llamada con todos los candidatos, mañana hay otra llamada y hay una
>> Wiki que ha sido creada para poder hacerle preguntas a todos los
>> candidatos?
>>
>> Si lo que se está consultando es si queremos tener una llamada solamente
>> con Alan, que es uno de los candidatos, no estoy de acuerdo. Considero que
>> debemos escuchar a todos los candidatos por igual.
>> Y si se está consultando si queremos tener una llamada adicional para
>> LACRALO con todos los candidatos, personalmente no lo veo necesario. En la
>> llamada que hay mañana hay interpretación al español, se puede participar
>> allí y hacer las preguntas que se consideren apropiadas para dirigir el
>> voto que luego emita el Chair de LACRALO en nombre de la región.
>> Aunque si los demás miembros de LACRALO entienden que tener esta llamada
>> adicional es necesario para emitir su opinión, adelante con ella.
>>
>> Saludos cordiales,
>> Fatima Cambronero
>>
>>
>> 2014-03-11 17:03 GMT-03:00 <cveraq at gmail.com>:
>>
>> >
>> > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]
>> >
>> >  Asunto: Re: Asiento de junta de ICANN
>> >  De: cveraq at gmail.com
>> >
>> >  Seria Llamada Una interesante y Oportuna
>> >
>> >
>> >  Carlos Vera Quintana
>> >  0988141143
>> >  Sígueme @ cveraq
>> >
>> >
>> > > El 11/03/2014, a las 14:49, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty at gmail.com>
>> > escribió:
>> > >
>> > > José,
>> > >
>> > > buenos puntos de discusión. Oigamos a la comunidad.
>> > >
>> > > Alejandro Pisanty
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:11 PM, <josefranciscoarce at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]
>> > >>
>> > >> Asunto: Re: Asiento de junta de ICANN
>> > >> De: josefranciscoarce at gmail.com
>> > >>
>> > >> Estimado Alejandro,
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Gracias por el Correo. Lo tuyo es Una propuesta? Consultaremos La
>> Misma
>> > un
>> > >> la región y actuare conforne
>> > >> Recuerden Que Yo sin nada definio, Solo la región desiciones Tomar
>> > >> Florerias.
>> > >> Los Miembros Individuales no hay votantes hijo, Pero si el
>> presidente en
>> > >> Nombre de la
>> > >> región, Casi lo Mismo.
>> > >> Solo Queda sable Si La región QUIERE Llamada Una Con Los postulados
>> > >> (QUIZAS
>> > >> Todos no Quieran), Alguna Otra propuesta o Simplemente discutiremos
>> ESTO
>> > >> en la Lista.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Saludos
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> José Arce
>> > >> El 11 de marzo 2014 14:46, &quot;Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch&quot; <
>> > >> apisan at unam.mx>
>> > >> escribi:
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>> José,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> como se dice popularmente en México, "o todos coludos o todos
>> rabones".
>> > >>> ¿Con qué reglas o criterios, si no hay reglas escritas, piensas que
>> se
>> > >>> conduzcan las campañas hacia LACRALOb de los competidores de ALAC
>> por
>> > el
>> > >>> Asiento 15 del Board? Estas reglas tendrían que ser equitativas,
>> > >>> transparentes, y concretas en cuanto al resultado ya que los
>> miembros
>> > de
>> > >>> LACRALO no somos votantes directos en esa elección.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Alejandro Pisanty
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>> > >>>     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
>> > >>> Facultad de Química UNAM
>> > >>> Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
>> > >>>
>> > >>> +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
>> > >>> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
>> > >>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
>> > >>> Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn,
>> > >>> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
>> > >>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
>> > >>> ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
>> > >>> .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
>> > >>>
>> > >>> ________________________________________
>> > >>> Desde: lac-discuss-en-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [
>> > >>> lac-discuss-en-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] en nombre de José
>> > >>> Francisco Arce [josefranciscoarce at gmail.com]
>> > >>> Enviado el: martes, 11 de marzo de 2014 05:37
>> > >>> Hasta: Alan Greenberg
>> > >>> CC: LACRALO discussion list
>> > >>> Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-en] ICANN Board seat
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Dear Alan, all
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Thanks for your kind email, and for let us know your general
>> > background.
>> > >> I
>> > >>> will ask the region if they have questions or prefer a personal call
>> > with
>> > >>> you to have direct contac, after review all the candidance´s
>> profiles.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Kind regards
>> > >>>
>> > >>> José Arce
>> > >>> LACRALO Chair
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> 2014-03-11 1:59 GMT-03:00 Alan Greenberg <greenberg.alan at gmail.com
>> >:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> Dear colleagues,
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> I  apologize for not being able to write in both Spanish and
>> English.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> The At-Large Board member cannot "represent" the ALAC or At-Large.
>> > Once
>> > >>>> appointed, the director is there purely on his/her own. However, we
>> > >> were
>> > >>>> given a seat on the Board to allow the issues relevant to users to
>> be
>> > >>>> factored into the debates. To do that, a person must be selected
>> who
>> > >> can
>> > >>>> best represent those interests.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> My ICANN history
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> - 8 years as a volunteer to At-Large, 6 on the ALAC, 8 years as
>>  ALAC
>> > >>>> Liaison to the GNSO. I have also held several leadership roles on
>> the
>> > >>> ALAC.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> - I have worked very hard to make At-Large respected within ICANN.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> - I have been the principal author of many of the statements
>> issues by
>> > >>> the
>> > >>>> ALAC over the last 8 years demonstrating my understanding of the
>> > issues
>> > >>>> important to At-Large.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> - Although I obviously do not agree with some ICANN participants, I
>> > >> have
>> > >>>> developed good working relationships with people in many diverse
>> areas
>> > >> of
>> > >>>> ICANN.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Professional background:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> - Over 30 years as a software developer and senior manager at
>> McGill
>> > >>>> University.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> - I was part of the small group that brought the Internet to
>> Canada.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> - I have volunteered in a number of professional organizations
>> prior
>> > to
>> > >>>> ICANN, including being a Board member for the Internet Society.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> - I spent 6 years as a volunteer to the Internet Society working
>> with
>> > >> and
>> > >>>> then running their Network Training Courses for people from
>> developing
>> > >>>> countries. We trained people from over 140 countries who were
>> > >>> instrumental
>> > >>>> in bringing the Internet to their countries. Alumni include
>> government
>> > >>>> ministers, ICANN Board members and ICANN employees. Most countries
>> in
>> > >>>> Central America, South America and the Caribbean attended and
>> courses
>> > >> in
>> > >>>> Spanish were also run in South America.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> - After my retirement from McGill, I spent several years
>> consulting on
>> > >>> the
>> > >>>> use of technology in developing economies (ICT4D), and worked in
>> > >> Africa,
>> > >>>> South Asia and Central America.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Strengths related to the Board position:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> - I have a very strong understanding of ICANN and its various
>> > >> components,
>> > >>>> of At-Large, and of the needs of Internet users.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> - I have a proven ability to work with others, and to influence
>> > >> outcomes.
>> > >>>> I am generally viewed as a thoughtful and articulate person, and I
>> am
>> > >> in
>> > >>> a
>> > >>>> very strong position to enter the Board and immediately be
>> effective.
>> > >>> Three
>> > >>>> of my references for my Expression of Interest for this Board
>> position
>> > >>> were
>> > >>>> current or former ICANN Board members, and their endorsements speak
>> > >> well
>> > >>> to
>> > >>>> my ability to quickly become an effective Board member.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> - My background with both the ISOC training workshops and my ICT4D
>> > >>>> consulting have made me acutely aware of the issues that are
>> important
>> > >> in
>> > >>>> the developing world.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> - I am free of any relationship with those who stand to make money
>> off
>> > >> of
>> > >>>> ICANN's decisions, and will not have any conflicts in carrying out
>> my
>> > >>>> mandate.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> - My track record of dedication (in both time and effort) to ICANN
>> and
>> > >>>> At-Large is well known, and I will put the same energy into
>> presenting
>> > >>> the
>> > >>>> needs of users on the Board.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> I do not believe that any other candidate can match all of my
>> > >>>> qualifications and I will not only be a good Board member, but an
>> > >>>> outstanding At-Large Board member.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> If I am selected, I can make a number of commitments:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> - I promise to stay in touch with the ALAC, At-Large and RALOs,
>> > through
>> > >>>> both face-to-face meetings and teleconferences. That is the only
>> way
>> > to
>> > >>>> ensure that I am aware of issues important to At-Large.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> - You will regularly hear from me about Board activities and my
>> > >>>> participation, and raising issues that I believe that At-Large may
>> > want
>> > >>> to
>> > >>>> focus on.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> - I will work to make sure that the bottom-up nature of ICANN is
>> > >>> preserved
>> > >>>> in fact and not only in words. This is key to ICANN's ability to
>> > >> continue
>> > >>>> to exist and meet its obligations.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> - While on the Board, I will work hard to increase its
>> transparency,
>> > to
>> > >>>> make sure that users issues are considered, and to ensure more
>> > >>>> participation in ICANN from people who are not funded by companies
>> and
>> > >>> who
>> > >>>> do not speak English. Both of these were important proposals that I
>> > >>> fought
>> > >>>> for in the ATRT2 Report (http://www.icann.org/en/
>> > >>>> about/aoc-review/atrt/final-recommendations-31dec13-en.pdf or
>> > >>>> http://www.icann.org/es/about/aoc-review/atrt/final-
>> > >>>> recommendations-31dec13-es.pdf, page 9-11, section 10.3 and 10.5)
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> I will be happy to answer any questions.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Regards, Alan
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> _______________________________________________
>> > >>>> lac-discuss-en mailing list
>> > >>>> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> > >>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> --
>> > >>> Arce, José F.
>> > >>> http://lnkd.in/bPdTThz
>> > >>> _______________________________________________
>> > >>> lac-discuss-en mailing list
>> > >>> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> > >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> >
>> >
>> >



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/418b3c3493.html
--]]

More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list