[lac-discuss-en] discrimination

[bronstein.sergio at gmail.com]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: discrimination 
 From: bronstein.sergio at gmail.com

 Good morning everyone. 
 Just as an personalsima declaration and as a contribution to the debate. 


 The position expressed by the Soto and Camborero estbasada companions in a 
 clear policy and social discrimination that should be rejected outright and 
 so blunt. 


 The concept citizen is (obviously) referred to inhabit one 
 city, can not be other than flesh and blood people who share 
 spaces, culture and common interests. Qusern users then one 
 something connected to a computer or another service? In any case, what is 
 wrong is the concept of the user, and that we will have to change in 
 Icann statutes. 


 I wonder, when we talk about digital inclusion to qunos we are 
 referring? Personally, I refer mainly to an are not 
 Internet users.Ergo, if an organization is working on it and 
 according to the criteria put forward by the above, should not be part of 
 Icann. 


 And when I say a policy is discrimination, I do it to the fullest 
 of facts. The political process in Ecuador, Venezuela, Bolivia and 
 other countries have in common being citizen recovery processes. Already 
 voters are not simple, users, consumers, etc.., people are now 
 policies, are an integral and crucial part of the "polis" (city 
 Greek), and you know how the name was not dealing with the 
 common problems of the polis? they are the "ideos", a Greek word that gave 
 rise to our word "idiot." 


 Recall that Alberto Soto impulshace project for a while 
 leave out of Icann members to activate the little 
 organization. Our reflection was then assess if it was, 
 be put first the commitment of each parameter with ALS 
 users (citizens, institutions?) that deca be representing.
 Because really, between us there is more than one institution "of maletn" 
 whose unique activity of its spokesmen career is not within Icann 
 ESTN able to prove absolutely nothing real in favor of their 
 O is represented as? 


 Finally, I think the history that I describe in the previous paragraph, 
 discriminatory ascomo this new initiative mentioned, has 
 nico aimed leave out of someone who does not votacina 
 control. No single argument leun cosistente as expressed by them. 


 A big hug, 
 Sergio Bronstein 
 President 
 Internauta Venezuela 
 _______________________________________________ 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/61fc3476bc.html
--]]