[lac-discuss-en] discrimination
bronstein.sergio at gmail.com
bronstein.sergio at gmail.com
Sun Mar 9 14:57:09 UTC 2014
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: discrimination
From: bronstein.sergio at gmail.com
Good morning everyone.
Just as an personalsima declaration and as a contribution to the debate.
The position expressed by the Soto and Camborero estbasada companions in a
clear policy and social discrimination that should be rejected outright and
so blunt.
The concept citizen is (obviously) referred to inhabit one
city, can not be other than flesh and blood people who share
spaces, culture and common interests. Qusern users then one
something connected to a computer or another service? In any case, what is
wrong is the concept of the user, and that we will have to change in
Icann statutes.
I wonder, when we talk about digital inclusion to qunos we are
referring? Personally, I refer mainly to an are not
Internet users.Ergo, if an organization is working on it and
according to the criteria put forward by the above, should not be part of
Icann.
And when I say a policy is discrimination, I do it to the fullest
of facts. The political process in Ecuador, Venezuela, Bolivia and
other countries have in common being citizen recovery processes. Already
voters are not simple, users, consumers, etc.., people are now
policies, are an integral and crucial part of the "polis" (city
Greek), and you know how the name was not dealing with the
common problems of the polis? they are the "ideos", a Greek word that gave
rise to our word "idiot."
Recall that Alberto Soto impulshace project for a while
leave out of Icann members to activate the little
organization. Our reflection was then assess if it was,
be put first the commitment of each parameter with ALS
users (citizens, institutions?) that deca be representing.
Because really, between us there is more than one institution "of maletn"
whose unique activity of its spokesmen career is not within Icann
ESTN able to prove absolutely nothing real in favor of their
O is represented as?
Finally, I think the history that I describe in the previous paragraph,
discriminatory ascomo this new initiative mentioned, has
nico aimed leave out of someone who does not votacina
control. No single argument leun cosistente as expressed by them.
A big hug,
Sergio Bronstein
President
Internauta Venezuela
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/61fc3476bc.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list