[lac-discuss-en] ? 8859-1 q = iso-F3n Primer_Borrador_de_Declaraci = _ = q = iso-8859-1 de_AT-Large_sobre_Modificaci = F3n_de_los_Estatutos_respecto = q = iso-8859-1 _de_las_consideraciones_del_GAC =????
vanda at uol.com.br
vanda at uol.com.br
Mon Sep 8 18:55:51 UTC 2014
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re:? 8859-1 q = iso-F3n Primer_Borrador_de_Declaraci = _ = q = iso-8859-1 de_AT-Large_sobre_Modificaci = F3n_de_los_Estatutos_respecto = q = iso-8859-1 _de_las_consideraciones_del_GAC =????
From: vanda at uol.com.br
Dear,
I had already expressed my position counter 75% of the members
for a refusal to proposals of Gac.
Alexander will get going in the same direction. I be interesting to read The
Economist - The Internet Power Vacuum Worsens
(L-gordon-Crovitz-the-internet-power-vacuum-worsens-1410124265
<http://m.us.wsj.com/articles/l-gordon-crovitz-the-internet-power-vacuum-wo
RSENS-1410124265? mobile & mg = y =-wsj reno64>) removing questions of
critical internal politics of Democrats and Republicans x concentrating
point in the actions of ICANN.
Vanda Scartezini
Polo Consultores Associados
Av. Paulista 1159, 1004 cj
01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
On 9/8/14, 14:09, "Alejandro Pisanty" <apisanty at gmail.com> wrote:
> Alberto, all
>
> After the msa background to explore the subject of "GAC advice" on
> Conversations with various people in the IGF, and other
> Analysis, I have come to this conclusion:
>
> One. We must continue to put limits to the stealthy penetration of positions
> Affected the control, and therefore specifically hold our position
> About not increase the specific gravity of the quasi-veto opininy
> GAC.
>
> 2. We may be losing sight of a key point of the proposal:
> Explcitos votes in the GAC. The positions of the GAC so obliging
> Special Board should have the vote counted. Otherwise estaramos
> Contine to support a current bad situation. In sta, few
> Governments may not impose a position that is offset by the
> Majority.This seems to be the situation regarding .vin / .wine eg
> To cite a particular case, that is not the only one.
>
> I propose to modify accordingly the text of our proposal
> And actively drive change in the ALAC.
>
> Alejandro Pisanty
>
>
> 8/23/2014 12:24 GMT-05: 00 Alberto Soto <asoto at ibero-americano.org> :
>
>> Dear, estbamos preparing our draft, but both Humberto
How come >>
>> I are working in coordination with Ftima (our ALAC Member).
She >>
We >> avisde herein, there was a small delay problem
The >>
Mailing list >> ALAC (technician problem), but aquest.
So far >> all communications received in our
Regin >>,
>> Are coincident with statements in the document, as Alexander said,
>> None in opposition.
>> Therefore, we adopt the same as our opinion Of Regin,
Staff >> solicitndole to their collaboration to be on the same wiki
Published >> Manuscripts.This will level the playing field for all
Our >>
>> Documents are presented.
Now we just >> accessing it on the wiki, and do the
Suggestions >>
Consider as >> convenient. Our comments received Sern
Up >>
>> September 3 at 20 UTC
That >> Short link: http://goo.gl/XYt9FT
>>
Thank >> Ftima that allows us to demonstrate the coordinated work that
Allows >> good things and save time and labor.
Best regards >> !!
>>
Alberto Soto >>
>>
----- Original Message ----- >>
>> From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of
Fatima >>
Cambronero >>
>> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 1:01 pm
>> To: LACRALO Espaol
>> Subject: [lac-discuss-es] First Draft Declaration of At-Large
About >>
Modifying >> Statutes regarding considerations GAC
>>
Dear >> / os,
>>
>>
>>
As adelantLen >> yesterday in an email to this list, we have l i
Worked as rapporteurs >> (pen holders) a declaration on this
Case >>
>> From ALAC.
>>
>>
In this declaration >> We have considered the comments that have been
LACRALO >> done since besides those coming from ALAC.
>>
>>
This first draft >> declaration can be found at the following
>> Link:
>>
>>
>> https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+Proposed+Bylaw
S + C >>
Regarding hanges >> + + Consideration + of + GAC + + Workspace Advice
>>
>>
>>
This first draft >> estabierto declaration to all comments
At-Large >>. There is still time allotted for reviews.
We will report here >> when that term is defined.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
Fatima Cambronero >>
>>
>>
>> -
* >> * Fatima Cambronero
Attorney-Argentina >>
>>
>> Phone: +54 9351 5282 668
>> Twitter:facambronero
Skype >>: fatima.cambronero
_______________________________________________ >>
Lac-discuss->>'s mailing list
Lac-discuss->> es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>>
Http://www.lacralo.org >>
>>
_______________________________________________ >>
Lac-discuss->>'s mailing list
Lac-discuss->> es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>>
Http://www.lacralo.org >>
>>
>
>
>
> -
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
>Facultad de Química UNAM
>Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
>+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
>+525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
>Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
>LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
>Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn,
>http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
>Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
>---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
>. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>_______________________________________________
>lac-discuss-es mailing list
>lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>
>http://www.lacralo.org
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/d092b647ff.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list