[lac-discuss-en] Fwd: ICANN News Alert - Proposed ICANN Accountability Charter for Enhancing Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) Submitted for Consideration
apisanty at gmail.com
apisanty at gmail.com
Thu Nov 6 04:31:38 UTC 2014
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Fwd: ICANN News Alert - Proposed ICANN Accountability Charter for Enhancing Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) Submitted for Consideration
From: apisanty at gmail.com
Colleagues,
possibly some of you. have received the news and call it
Annex, which asks us to adopt the rules that funcionarun group
working conditions to define accountability of ICANN.
We regulate the standard by which our representatives vote Bern
ALAC.
I feel compelled to express some substantive aspects oposicina
project and propose a modification:
The document is rich in complex, typical of a large bureaucracy rules.
It does not seem possible to simplify the rules prevailing in the environment but
expressed the request to find a simplificacin.
The substantive point, however, goes further allaunque is based in part on
this observation: at no time is considered that an increase in the
rules of transparency and accountability can cost in
operaciny effectiveness of ICANN in their substantive functions.
When operating as the proposal is contrary to the interests of users
Internet and in particular the system user name
domain, which records payments with our finance virtually
entire system.
What primarily interested users that the DNS is resolved
biunvoca way domain names with high levels of performance, and
extreme security, stability and resiliency. In the background,
applicable only to a subset of users, processes matter
ICANN are simple and predictable, from minor adjustments to the
legal instruments to the creation of new domain names.
The baroque system of accountability that has been created with
ATRT processes 1 and 2 is itself quite complex and expensive and produces
distractions of the substantive task. The new round to start estpor
have all followed pronsticos aadiendo layers of complexity.
So let me make a simple proposal: "add criteria
considerarn that the impact on the effectiveness, efficiency and costs
substantive processes of ICANN facing Internet users. "
Hope this will be taken up directly without the convolutions with
a similar proposal made during the ATLAS II farce
was transformed in the demand for "contributions to the efficacy of
ICANN "in" greater listening ICANN ALAC for their recommendations
have efficacy. "
Best regards,
Alejandro Pisanty
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff at atlarge.icann.org>
Date: Wed, November 5, 2014 at 6:10 PM
Subject: [ALAC-Announce] ICANN News Alert - Proposed Charter for Enhancing
ICANN Accountability Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) Submitted for
Consideration
To: "alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org" <
alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
[Image: ICANN] <http://www.icann.org/> News Alert
https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-11-05-en
------------------------------
Proposed ICANN Accountability Charter for Enhancing Cross Community Working
Group (CCWG) Submitted for Consideration
5 November 2014
On 3 November 2014, the Drafting Team That was FORMED by the ICANN
community to Develop a charter for the ICANN Accountability Enhancing Cross
Community Working Group (CCWG) distributed to charter for adoption by
Organizations chartering. The charter includes, Among other things, to
problem statement, goals & Objectives, Scope, and Proposed areas for work.
The CCWG STI is expected to organize activities in two Work Streams
Enhancing consistent With The Revised ICANN Accountability Process
< https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/process-next-steps-2014-10-10-en>:
* Work Stream 1 *: Enhancing ICANN-mechanisms focused on accountability That
must be in place-committed to or Within the time frame of the IANA
Stewardship Transition; and
* * Work Stream 2: Addressing accountability focused on topics for Which a
timeline for Developing solutions and full Implementation May extend beyond
the IANA Stewardship Transition.
Next Steps
Each ICANN Supporting Organization (SO) and Advisory Committee (AC) is
expected to Consider Proposed charter During the upcoming November STI
meeting (s). Following the adoption of the charter, chartering Organizations
are expected to identify identity Their representative members to serve on the CCWG
(Each chartering organization will appoint a minimum of 2 and a maximum of
Five members to the CCWG). In Addition, a call for volunteers to join the CCWG
Will Be Launched, So THAT In This effort anyone interested join and May
Participate. The CCWG STI is expected to commence in late Deliberations
November or early December.
All members < https://community.icann.org/x/TwHxAg>
Known as the "Cross Community Group" will be added to the CCWG as
Participants, UNLESS some are appointed by chartering Organizations to
serve as members or decides not to join this effort.
Drafting Team Background
Considering the short timeframe ahead and the relation of part of the
Accountability to the IANA work Stewardship Transition process, the
Drafting Team Worked on an expedited basis to Develop the charter. The
publication date to align WAS Identified With The November meetings of
ICANN's SOs and ACs, to allow for the question of adoption to CCWG charter
be discussed. For details of each of the Drafting Team's meetings,
Including interim draft versions of the charter, please see here
< https://community.icann.org/x/kCjxAg>.
The Drafting Team ICANN51 WAS FORMED following the meeting and includes
members appointed by the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC), Address
Supporting Organization (ASO), Country Code Supporting Organization
(CcNSO), Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) and Generic Names Supporting
Organization (GNSO) .1 <# 1498271ed7b0f35e_foot1> In Addition, one
representative from outside the ICANN SO / AC structure joined the Drafting
Team to Ensure That the charter defined an inclusive process for the
Broader community. For a full list of Drafting Team members, please see here
< https://community.icann.org/x/jCjxAg>.
Additional Information
The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) has
Requested That ICANN "convene a multistakeholder process to Develop a Plan
US government to transition the stewardship role "with regard to the IANA
Functions and related root zone management. In making its announcement, the
NTIA Specified Proposal That the transition must have broad community
support and meet the following Principles:
- Support and Enhance the multistakeholder model
- Maintain the security, stability, and resiliency of the Internet DNS
- Meet the needs and expectation of the customers and partners of Global
the IANA services
- Maintain the openness of the Internet.
Also NTIA Specified That it would not accept a Proposal That Replaces the
NTIA role with a government-led or an Intergovernmental organization
solution.
During discussions around the transition process, the community raised the
Broader topic of the impact of the change on ICANN's accountability. The
Enhancing Accountability process WAS ICANN finalized and posted on 10
October 2014, and can be found here
< https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/process-next-steps-2014-10-10-en>.
The scope of the ICANN Enhancing Accountability process is defined as
Ensuring That Remains ICANN accountable in the Absence of Its historical
contractual relationship With The US Government and the Perceived
backstop With regard to ICANN's organization-wide accountability provided
by That role, process: such as the renewal of the IANA functions contract.
It calls for an examination, from an organizational perspective, of how
ICANN's accountability Broader-mechanisms to address Should be Strengthened
The Absence of Its historical contractual relationship With The US
Government, treats including looking at Strengthening Existing accountability
-mechanisms (eg, the ICANN Bylaws and the Affirmation of Commitments
< https://www.icann.org/en/about/agreements/aoc/affirmation-of-commitments-30sep09-en.htm>
).
Links to additional information:
Proposed Charter
< https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/49359098/Enhancing%20ICANN%20Accountability%20FINAL%20-%20Clean%20-%20Charter%20-%20updated%203%20November%202014.docx?api=v2>
[DOC, 67 KB]
Drafting Team Wiki < https://community.icann.org/x/XQHxAg>
Revised ICANN Enhancing Accountability Process
< https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/process-next-steps-2014-10-10-en>
For Further information, Please contact accountability-staff at icann.org.
------------------------------
1 <# 1498271ed7b0f35e_note1> RSSAC and SSAC Were invited to Participate in
the Drafting Team, but Were Unable to join the effort.
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/281b04a2d3.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list