[lac-discuss-en] Fwd: New Public Comment: Proposed Bylaws Changes Regarding Consideration of GAC Advice

[asoto at ibero-americano.org]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: Fwd: New Public Comment: Proposed Bylaws Changes Regarding Consideration of GAC Advice 
 From: asoto at ibero-americano.org

 Dear, we must pay atencina this comment public. What does the 
 GAC? This: 


 "The ComitAsesor (GAC) considers and provides advice 
 on the activities of ICANN in relation to the concerns of 
 governments, especially in areas where it may be an interaction between 
 ICANN's policies and various laws and international agreements or where 
 may affect issues of Public policy " 


 We are the representatives of the end users, and there is a direct relationship 
 between them and public policies imposed by governments. 


 Please participate .. The short URL Access: http://xurl.es/kfcpx 


 Best Regards 


 Alberto Soto 




 ----- Original Message ----- 
 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] In the name of Fatima 
 Cambronero 
 Posted on: Monday, August 18, 2014 10:46 pm 
 To: LACRALO Espaol 
 Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] New Public Comment: Proposed 
 Bylaws Changes Regarding Consideration of GAC Advice 


 Dear / os, 






 This topic has just been opened to comments ALAC. 




 Please, if you'll be interested to comment and request from LACRALO 
 whom we represent in ALAC LACRALO determined to vote 
 so, take the opportunity to do so when the period of estabierto comment 
 and has not been sent to Voting in ALAC. Otherwise it becomes very 
 difficult to fulfill the mandate of the region. 




 This theme, very briefly (you can read the attachments) implies 
 one modification of the ICANN Bylaws in relacina suggested by the 
 ATRT1. 




 Currently for the ICANN Board is a separate recommendation 
 by the GAC that decision should be taken by a simple majority 
 (50% + 1), in addition to explain to Qulo esthaciendo. 


 The proposed modification involves approved the same, now 
 Board will have to make the decision to depart from a recommendation of 
 GAC with a qualified majority (two thirds of the votes of its members). 




 In my personal reading, this decision involves giving more weight to 
 recommendations that the GAC will make to the Board of ICANN, because in order to 
 deviate from these recommendations deberconcurrir the vote of a greater 
 number of Board members. 




 Quopina LACRALO? Must approve the modification (2/3 vote of 
 Board members to deviate from recommendations GAC) or should 
 remain to date (50% +1 of the votes of its members)? Qu 
 policies may have implications this may decisiny quafectaciones 
 cause users of the Internet, specifically in our region?




 Thank you very much. 






 Best Regards, 


 Fatima Cambronero 




 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- 
 From: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff at atlarge.icann.org>
 Date: 8/18/2014 21:48 GMT-03: 00 
 Subject: [ALAC-Announce] New Public Comment: Proposed Bylaws Changes 
 Regarding Consideration of GAC Advice 
 To: &quot;alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org&quot; &lt; 
 alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org&gt; 




 Dear All, 


 Please kindly note That the At-Large workspace for the following Public 
 Comment request has-been created: Regarding Proposed Bylaws Changes 
 Consideration of GAC Advice &lt;  https://community.icann.org/x/KgHxAg> 


   Regards, 


 Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie 
 Peregrine and Terri Agnew ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC 
 E-mail: staff at atlarge.icann.org 
 Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann.atlarge 
 Twitter:ICANN_AtLarge &lt;  https://twitter.com/ICANN_AtLarge> 






 _______________________________________________ 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/e514003327.html
--]]