[lac-discuss-en] We agree with Sergio Salinas
apisan at unam.mx
apisan at unam.mx
Thu Aug 14 22:10:00 UTC 2014
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: We agree with Sergio Salinas
From: apisan at unam.mx
Sergio,
everything that you say, it seems that this position confirms Vanda reading (which I share):
What you say Christian Homes and supports the FIRST LEVEL appears to refer to the gTLD.
The ongoing discussion concerns the second level ** ** something aa.tld type, where a is any combination of two letters.
You can explicitly confirm or deny?
Alejandro Pisanty
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
School of Chemistry UNAM
3000 University Av,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
+ 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 FROM MEXICO
Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
Join the group on LinkedIn UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
________________________________________
From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Sergio Salinas Porto [presidencia at internauta.org.ar]
Posted on: Thursday, August 14, 2014 17:03
To: Vanda Scartezini
CC: Cristian Hernan Casas; LACRALO Espaol
Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] We agree with Sergio Salinas
Dear Vanda:
I'll try to be clear, anyone know (by knowledge or
usual) that two characters are used to demarcate the ccTLD.
Many times in ICANN (not always tell), are discussing what
want to do business, maybe it's time to start thinking about how
these changes will impact on end users.
We, the end users, who usually know (except for rare
exceptions, such as you name in your example) gTLDs are three oms
ccTLD characters and two-character
A ccTLD default allows us users know what law governs
these domains, in terms of rights and obligations and gives us some kind of
quiet as to how to manage with regard to this as
recognize to be clear rules.
The utilization of two characters in a NgTLD may cause some kind of
confusion about this and will put an "uncomfortable" place (to call
somehow) to Internet users.
The table on the ISO 3166 Alpha-2 -1 indicates that there are certain characters
they still were not used, but I believe these can be
used by passes or new territories at some point and MUST NOT
be given to anyone.
I always remember how the world has changed after the fall of the wall and
tambiny before and have changed the map of the world, what I consider
little of my child is no longer seen as I asy passes that were called for
now call a form from another or passes that made others today ESTN
separate and distinct called, which follow two table asesa
characters must be preserved for what it was created: one standard
providing international codes for the names of countries and other
administrative units to define level domain names
geogrfico superior and not to do business with some enterprising
a little money in their pockets.
I hope to be clear ... although this is quite complex.
A dear friend hug
* Sergio Salinas Porto
Argentina President Internauta
Argentina Association of Internet Users
<http://www.internauta.org.ar> / CTA <http://ctamdq.org.ar>
FLUI American Federation of Internet Users
<http://www.fuilatin.org>
facebook: salinasporto <http://www.facebook.com/salinasporto> &
sergiosalinasII <http://www.facebook.com/sergiosalinasII>
twitter: sergiosalinas <http://twitter.com/sergiosalinas>
Google+: Sergio Salinas Porto
< https://plus.google.com/104639152443153592254/posts>
Hangout: presidencia at internauta.org.ar
<Hangout%3Apresidencia at internauta.org.ar> /
Pixelhub: salinasporto <http://pixelhub.me/salinasporto>
Youtube: salinasporto <http://www.youtube.com/salinasporto>
Skype: internautaargentina
Mobi: +54 9 223 5 215819 *
* "Ojalpodamos be disobedient, whenever we received orders to
humiliate our conscience or violate our common sense "Eduardo
Galeano *
The August 14, 2014, 18:26, Vanda Scartezini <vanda at uol.com.br>
I wrote:
> Déjame entender. Estamos hablando de según nivel de nombres de dominio.
> Los ccTLD y otros gTLDs ya los están utilizando. Como aqui en Brasil hay,
> por ejemplo: @ ....bb.br para los bancos en Brasil. No creo que permitir
> a los demás con respectiva negociación con el dueno de los dos
> caracteres, sea diverso do que ya ocurre. Negar es tener un tratamiento
> diverso en el mercadeara grupos que disputan el mismo mercado, lo que no
> me parece justo.
> Para mi esto no es lo mismo que tener .amazon o .patagonia y si es lo
> mismo que tener - y nosotros o siquiera nuestros países contestaron -
> amazon.com o patagonia.com
> Es una cuestión de ser justo y tener la misma regla a todos. O a mi ver
> obrigamos a todos los que ya utilizan 2 caracteres ascii a cancelar estos
> nombres de según nivel.
> Agradezco si me convencen del contrario
> Abrazos
>
> Vanda Scartezini
> Polo Consultores Associados
> Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
> 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
> Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
> Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 8/12/14, 13:23, "Cristian Casas" <cristiancasas at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Coincidimos con Sergio Salinas Porto en especial a la sugerencia de que el
> >voto sea negativo, ya que sobre esto y en otros temas
> >similares nos hemos manifestado varias organizaciones en LACRALO con
> >respecto a los ngtld y su relación con códigos de país o regiones
> >geográficas (casos: patagonia., .amazonas, .cba.y anexamos la disputa por
> >el mal uso de la lista de ISO 3166-MA en el caso .fk y .gs).
> >
> >Cristian Casas
> >_______________________________________________
> >lac-discuss-es mailing list
> >lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
> >
> >http://www.lacralo.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-es mailing list
> lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>
> http://www.lacralo.org
>
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/74b3da8725.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list