[lac-discuss-en] We agree with Sergio Salinas

presidencia at internauta.org.ar presidencia at internauta.org.ar
Thu Aug 14 22:04:56 UTC 2014


[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: We agree with Sergio Salinas 
 From: presidencia at internauta.org.ar

 Dear Vanda: 
 I'll try to be clear, anyone know (by knowledge or 
 usual) that two characters are used to demarcate the ccTLD. 
 Many times in ICANN (not always tell), are discussing what 
 want to do business, maybe it's time to start thinking about how 
 these changes would impact on end users. 
 We, the end users, who usually know (except for rare 
 exceptions, such as you name in your example) gTLDs are three or more 
 ccTLD characters and two-character 
 A ccTLD default allows us users know what law governs 
 these domains, in terms of rights and obligations and gives us some kind of 
 quiet as to how to manage with regard to this as 
 recognize to be clear rules.
 The use of two characters in a NgTLD may cause some kind of 
 confusion about this and put in a "uncomfortable" place (to call 
 somehow) to Internet users. 
 The table on the ISO 3166 Alpha-2 -1 indicates that there are certain characters 
 that were not yet used, but I believe these can be 
 used by countries or new territories at some point and should not 
 be given to anyone.
 I always remember how the world has changed after the fall of the wall and 
 before as well and have changed the map of the world, what I consider 
 when I was a child is no longer the case and I have seen how countries called for 
 now call a form from another or other countries that formed today are 
 separate and distinct called, so that the table and following two 
 characters must be preserved for what it was created: a standard 
 providing international codes for country names and other 
 administrative units to define level domain names 
 geographic superior and not to do business with some enterprising 
 a little money in their pockets. 
 I hope to be clear ... although this is quite complex. 
 A dear friend hug 












 * Sergio Salinas Porto 
 Argentina President Internauta 
 Argentina Association of Internet Users 
<http://www.internauta.org.ar> / CTA <http://ctamdq.org.ar>
 FLUI American Federation of Internet Users 
<http://www.fuilatin.org>
 facebook: salinasporto <http://www.facebook.com/salinasporto> &amp; 
 sergiosalinasII <http://www.facebook.com/sergiosalinasII>
 twitter: sergiosalinas <http://twitter.com/sergiosalinas>
 Google+: Sergio Salinas Porto 
 &lt;  https://plus.google.com/104639152443153592254/posts> 
 Hangout: presidencia at internauta.org.ar 
<Hangout%3Apresidencia at internauta.org.ar> / 
 Pixelhub: salinasporto <http://pixelhub.me/salinasporto>
 Youtube: salinasporto <http://www.youtube.com/salinasporto>
 Skype: internautaargentina 
 Mobi: +54 9 223 5 215819 * 


 * &quot;Hopefully we can be disobedient, whenever we received orders 
 humiliate our conscience or violate our common sense &quot;Eduardo 
 Galeano * 






 The August 14, 2014, 18:26, Vanda Scartezini <vanda at uol.com.br>
 wrote:


> Déjame entender. Estamos hablando de según nivel de nombres de dominio.
> Los ccTLD y otros gTLDs ya los están utilizando. Como aqui en Brasil hay,
> por ejemplo:  @ ....bb.br para los bancos en Brasil.  No creo que permitir
> a los demás  con respectiva negociación con el dueno de los dos
> caracteres, sea diverso do que ya ocurre.  Negar es  tener un tratamiento
> diverso en el mercadeara grupos que disputan el mismo mercado,  lo que no
> me parece justo.
> Para mi esto no es lo mismo que tener .amazon o  .patagonia  y si es lo
> mismo que tener - y nosotros o siquiera nuestros países contestaron -
> amazon.com o patagonia.com
> Es una cuestión de  ser justo y tener la misma regla a todos. O  a mi ver
> obrigamos a todos los que ya utilizan 2 caracteres ascii a cancelar estos
> nombres de según nivel.
> Agradezco si me convencen del contrarioÅ 
> Abrazos
>
> Vanda Scartezini
> Polo Consultores Associados
> Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
> 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
> Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
> Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 8/12/14, 13:23, "Cristian Casas" <cristiancasas at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Coincidimos con Sergio Salinas Porto en especial a la sugerencia de que el
> >voto sea negativo, ya que sobre esto y en otros temas
> >similares nos hemos manifestado varias organizaciones en LACRALO con
> >respecto a los ngtld y su relación con códigos de país o regiones
> >geográficas (casos: patagonia., .amazonas, .cba.y anexamos la disputa por
> >el mal uso de la lista de ISO 3166-MA en el caso .fk y .gs).
> >
> >Cristian Casas
> >_______________________________________________
> >lac-discuss-es mailing list
> >lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
> >
> >http://www.lacralo.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-es mailing list
> lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>
> http://www.lacralo.org
>
 lac-discuss-en mailing list 
 lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es 


 http://www.lacralo.org 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/9e2d20b1d0.html
--]]




More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list