[lac-discuss-en] ???? = Iso-8859-1 3A_solicitud_de_comentarios q = FW = 3A = q = iso-8859-1 _Declaraci = F3n_del_ALAC_sobre_la_introducci = F3n_de_dos_car = q = iso-8859-1 acteres_de_nombres_de_dominio_en_el_Nuevo_gTLD_Espacio_de_?? = = iso-8859-1? q? names? =

Tue Aug 12 14:49:38 UTC 2014

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re:???? = Iso-8859-1 3A_solicitud_de_comentarios q = FW = 3A = q = iso-8859-1 _Declaraci = F3n_del_ALAC_sobre_la_introducci = F3n_de_dos_car = q = iso-8859-1 acteres_de_nombres_de_dominio_en_el_Nuevo_gTLD_Espacio_de_?? = = iso-8859-1? q? names? = 
 From: apisan at unam.mx

 Alberto, 

 the declaracinbsicamente says nothing. And ALAC are already Voting. This issue has been on the table long. In LACRALO who might have more interest are those involved in international territories in dispute and are not expressed. 

 That suggests the conclusion that we really have a collective opinin formed and must vote in abstention.

 Of course there are also aware that they do not bring any later serposible complaint and we will be dedicating the existing situation for the use of country codes under new gTLDs: some protections for names is n today's list of ISO 3166-MA and future ningn space on the second level for the territories that are created or recognized, or cambin name (in the last decade or two in Latin America at least three continental countries have changed names, or this ssucede). 

 Best regards. 

 Alejandro Pisanty 

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty 
 School of Chemistry UNAM 
 3000 University Av,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico 

 + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD

 SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 FROM MEXICO 
 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com 
 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty 
 Join the group on LinkedIn UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty 
 ---- &gt;&gt; Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org 
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

 ________________________________________ 
 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Alberto Soto [asoto at ibero-americano.org] 
 Posted on: Monday, 11 August 2014 14:43 
 To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] FW: Request for comments: ALAC Declaration on the introduction of two-character domain names in the new gTLD namespace 

 Thanks to the quick response Dev. 
 Dear, if you follow the thread that gives Dev, there vern reviews 
 found on this topic. Already have intervened Ftima and Ada, as podrn 
 see. 
 I welcome your comments 

 Best Regards 

 Alberto Soto

 ----- Original Message ----- 
 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of 
 devtee at gmail.com 
 Posted on: Monday, August 11, 2014 3:04 pm 
 To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Subject: Re: FW: Request for comments: ALAC Declaration on 
 introduction of two-character domain names in the new gTLD 
 Namespace 

 [[Translated text (en -&gt; s) -]] 

 Subject: Re: FW: Request for comments: ALAC Declaration on 
 introduction of two-character domain names in the new gTLD 
 Namespace 
 From: devtee at gmail.com 

 Dear Alberto, 

 My attempt at a declaration (  https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg) 
 two points: 

 - Issues of safety and stability Absent any DNS related, 
 and given the use of 
 2 strings of various gTLD and ccTLD, the convenience of 
 ms shorter domains are used to potential registrants and 
 two characters 
 For other meanings, no restriction should be no two 
 characters 
 ASCII labels on the second level within the TLD as agreements 
 Registration 
 (Specification for the two labels all 5 blocks of characters in the second 
 level 
 Default) 

 - The second preocupacin is with respect to the logic that is used to 
 many RSEP 
 excepcina applications for the registration specification 5, which asks 
 that 
 Release 2 no strings of letters in the ISO list is actual.Considero 
 erroneous 
 because the ISO list is not static and is periodically updated to 
 reflect 
 changes in the countries and territories.This results in a potential 
 disparity in the future in some countries and territories ESTN 
 protected 
 on the Specification for the 5, but the future they are not. This (in my mind), no 
 must be 
 and all countries and territories should be treated equally. 

 However, this second point has received several comments that if there 
 consensus to any restriction by the RSEPs qusolo requests, 
 especially 
 labels for two characters on the second level and ESTN happening 
 for 
 various gTLD and ccTLD? And if the latter withdraws preocupacin really 
 I have to say that the first preocupacin? 

 Dev Anand 

 On Friday, August 8, 2014 at 1:20 pm, <asoto at ibero-americano.org>
 I wrote: 
 > 
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
>  Subject: FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Introduction of
> Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace
>  From: asoto at ibero-americano.org
>
>  Hi Dev, please can make a summary of a few lines on this
>  subject to our Regin?
>
>
>  Thank you very much!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Alberto
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  From: alac-announce-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>  [Mailto: alac-announce-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of
> ICANN
>  At-Large Staff
>  Posted on: Friday, August 8, 2014 11:07 a.m.
>  To: ALAC-Announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>  Subject: [ALAC-Announce] CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the
>  Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Dear All,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Olivier Crpin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, you Asked That a call for
>  be made comments on the draft ALAC Statement on the Introduction of
>  Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace
>  &lt;  https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg>
>  ALAC ratification process.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  The current draft, as well as additional information on the Public
> Comment,
>  can be found on the At-Large Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names
>  the New gTLD Namespace Workspace &lt;
> https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Please submit any comments on the workspace by using the comments
>  11 August 2014 20:00 GMT.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Regards,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie
>  Peregrine and Terri Agnew
>
>
>  ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
>
>
>  E-mail: staff at atlarge.icann.org
>
>
>  ich,% 20Vivanco 20Silvia%%% 20Ashtiani 20Matt% 20Liang 20Ariel%%% 20Gru
> 20Gisella
>  ber, 20Nathalie%%% 20and% 20Peregrine 20Julia 20ICANN%%% 20Charvolen
> 20Policy% 20Sta
>  ff% 20in% 20support% 20of% 20ALACmailto: staff at atlarge.icann.org&gt;
>
>
>
>
>

[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/83cb185d0c.html
--]]