[lac-discuss-en] ??? = Iso-8859-1 == q 3A_Recom Solicitud_de_comentarios = iso-8859-1 q = endaciones_Grupo_de_Trabajo_Regiones_Geogr E1ficas =?

asoto at ibero-americano.org asoto at ibero-americano.org
Sun Dec 29 00:27:29 UTC 2013


[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re:??? = Iso-8859-1 == q 3A_Recom Solicitud_de_comentarios = iso-8859-1 q = endaciones_Grupo_de_Trabajo_Regiones_Geogr E1ficas =? 
 From: asoto at ibero-americano.org

 Dear Fatima, before taking to the Wiki I write here, because it is not a 
 custom of many to go to it. The report is quite long and complicated 
 to understand fully. 
 To address the issue of geogrficas divisions, discussing early 
 diversity at various points, but there are many differences: geogrficas, 
 Culture, lingsticas ... 
 ISO 3166 also cited for it to be taken as a basis, but 
 immediately suggests that organizations and communities will be able 
 apply for other geographic regions reasignacina According deem 
 to their jurisdiction, which the ISO 3166 remain invalidated. Neither 
 states that adopted this point if there will be any limitacina 
 applications for a community who are LACRALO, ask to be reassigned to 
 APRALO eg.
 Honestly, today is 28, a night in Argentina, and time is short 
 reading. At least were the previous comments on the wiki 
 from your management. 
 Best and Happy Holidays! Greetings! 


 Alberto Soto 


 ----- Original Message ----- 
 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] In the name of Fatima 
 Cambronero 
 Posted on: by saturday, December 28, 2013 7:32 pm 
 To: LACRALO Espaol Olivier Crpin-Leblond; tijani.benjemaa @ topnet.tn; 
 Maureen Hilyard Moari 
 Subject: [lac-discuss-es] Request for Comments: Recommendations Group 
 Working Regions Geogrficas 


 Dear, 




 As they had advanced in an earlier post, is open to 
 community feedback Recommendations Working Group 
 Regions Geogrficas. 




 In LACRALO habamos already discussed this issue in June this year barely 
 publicel Final Report. 




 I have taken these comments to the first draft was drawn from 
 ALAC and is posted on the Wiki this link: 
 http://goo.gl/giCgHt 


 In that same link encontrarn the Final Report and the various notes 
 have circulated about the topic. 




 What this issue in the last meeting discutisobre ALAC and 
 between those who work with the first draft, was to write a short 
 note, including various comments that were received and Haban 
 discussed so far, especially for those 
 recommendations that could affect the At-Large community. 




 This topic will be open for comment until 31 December. May 
 make their comments directly on the Wiki or if they do here, 
 I offer to take them to ALAC. 




 Thank you very much. 




 Best Regards, 


 Fatima Cambronero 








 - 
 * Fatima * Cambronero 
 Attorney-Argentina 


 Phone: +54 9351 5282 668 
 Twitter: @ facambronero 
 Skype: fatima.cambronero 


 * Join the LACRALO / ICANN discussions: * 
 https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es 


 * Join the Diplo Internet Governance Community discussions: * 
 http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/ 


 * Join to the Internet Society (ISOC): * http://www.internetsociety.org/ 
 _______________________________________________ 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/5003dcd918.html
--]]




More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list