[lac-discuss-en] FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Proposed Bylaws Changes Regarding the Technical Liaison Group

[Dev Anand Teelucksingh]

I have made some comments on the wiki
https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=43985282
due to the contradictions in the statement, namely, the statement supports
the proposed bylaw changes to remove the TLG liasion to the Board (but not
the TLG itself) but concluding that the TLG liasion must be kept pending
further community consultations to further maintain/enhance the presence of
persons with technical expertise on the Board.

Kind Regards,

Dev Anand


On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 5:03 PM, <fatimacambronero at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
>  Subject: Re: FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Proposed Bylaws
> Changes Regarding the Technical Liaison Group
>  From: fatimacambronero at gmail.com
>
>  Dear,
>
>
>
>
>  Thank you very much to Alexander, Albert and Ada for participating with
> their
>  important comments and suggestions to improve this draft
>  declaration.
>
>
>  Personally I think that is good declaration logruna including
>  different views on the subject. I hope you can share this
>  opinion.
>
>
>
>
>  I posted our declaration on the Wiki where I esttratando ALAC
>  this topic. The can be found here:
>
> https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+Proposed+Bylaws+Changes+Regarding+the+Technical+Liaison+Group+Workspace?focusedCommentId=43984824
>
>
>
>
>  I also sent an email to ALAC has been added stating that this
>  LACRALO declaration so that it can be discussed and adopted as a
>  declaration of ALAC.
>
>
>
>
>  The final declaration of LACRALO in the version in English, was also
>  added in the Wiki that abriJospara this topic
>  https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=43985282
>
>
>
>
>  The mantendrinformados what is discussed and decided in ALAC.
>
>
>
>
>  Thank you very much tambina Matt Ashtiani who colaborrevisando the version
>  in English.
>
>
>
>
>  Best Regards,
>
>
>  Fatima
>
>
>
>
>  On December 3, 2013 14:44, Aida Noblia <aidanoblia at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > Estimados:
> >
> > He leído los documentos y mails. Estoy en general de acuerdo con la
> > declaración y lo que han expuesto Alejandro, Fátima y Alberto.
> >
> > Entiendo que es indudable que la participación activa de los técnicos
> como
> > soporte y desde el inicio, con voz y voto, no solo a requerimiento es de
> > vital importancia,  que la rotación anual que se realizaba es
> > contraproducente para el cumplimiento efectivo de brindar la seguridad y
> > estabilidad técnica completa en todas las etapas.
> >
> >
> > Copio en la wiki
> > Saludos
> > --
> > Aida Noblia
> > _______________________________________________
> > lac-discuss-es mailing list
> > lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
> >
> > http://www.lacralo.org
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  * Fatima * Cambronero
>  Attorney-Argentina
>
>
>  Phone: +54 9351 5282 668
>  Twitter: @ facambronero
>  Skype: fatima.cambronero
>
>
>  * Join the LACRALO / ICANN discussions: *
>  https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>
>
>  * Join the Diplo Internet Governance Community discussions: *
>  http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/
>
>
>  * Join to the Internet Society (ISOC): * http://www.internetsociety.org/
>  _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> [[--Original text (es)
> http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/a1f884ceda.html
> --]]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>
>