[lac-discuss-en] ? = Iso-8859-1 == q F3n_Consulta_sobre_Memoran VOTES = iso-8859-1 q = do_de_Entendimiento_con_LACNIC??

carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com
Wed Nov 27 10:17:24 UTC 2013


[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re:? = Iso-8859-1 == q F3n_Consulta_sobre_Memoran VOTES = iso-8859-1 q = do_de_Entendimiento_con_LACNIC?? 
 From: carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com

 Alex, you're changing the axis once more and not with that intention. My idea is clear in this regard and has nothing to do with issues still to devote my efforts. 
 My point, again, is to conclude this matter by yes or no. The issue was raised at the regional consideracin there pocisiones found, who presented not removed and insists his proposal. Then we vote and termineos this. As simple as this. 
 You have a strong bitterness with the president and this while not estdejndote be pragmtico or view output without adding complexity. 
 A hug. 


 Carlos Dionisio Aguirre. 


 Sent from my BlackBerry device inalmbrico


 ----- Original Message ----- 
 From: Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty at gmail.com>
 Date: Wed, November 27, 2013 3:12:04 
 To: <carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com>
 Cc: <lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org> ; <staff at atlarge.icann.org> ; <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
 Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-in]? = Iso-8859-1 == q F3n_Consulta_sobre_Memoran 
 VOTES = iso-8859-1 q = do_de_Entendimiento_con_LACNIC?? 




 Carlos, 




 between pursuing an imaginary agreement boldly and rationally review on substantive issues such as the quality of the technical information available on ICANN decisions, do you prefer to spend cul efforts? 




 Your opinin seresclarecedora to identify the priorities of the board and the community, and the degree of alignment between the two. 




 Alejandro Pisanty 






 On Tue, November 26, 2013 at 9:04 PM, carlos aguirre dionisio <carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com <mailto:carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com> &gt; Wrote: 
 I cant believe.We need desitions take, and when to info we have not unanimous thoughts acerca a determinate issue, is a good and democratic thing to proceed to vote the proposal. I support the motion raised by Secretariat and President. 
 We will have in a short time, after vote at Regional Final desition on this subject, in one sense or other. 


 Carlos Dionisio Aguirre. 






 Sent from my BlackBerry device inalmbrico 


 ----- Original Message ----- 
 From: apisanty at gmail.com <mailto:apisanty at gmail.com>
 Date: Wed, November 27, 2013 2:38:49 
 To: <lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org> &gt; 
 Cc: <staff at atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org> &gt;; <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org> &gt; 
 Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-in]? = Iso-8859-1 == q F3n_Consulta_sobre_Memoran 
 VOTES = iso-8859-1 q = do_de_Entendimiento_con_LACNIC?? 






 [[- Translated text (en -&gt; en) -]] 


 Subject: Re:? = Iso-8859-1 == q F3n_Consulta_sobre_Memoran VOTES = iso-8859-1 q = do_de_Entendimiento_con_LACNIC?? 
 From: apisanty at gmail.com <mailto:apisanty at gmail.com>


 Sylvia, 




 mocin order. Clearly this agreement LACNIC manifestque ARE NOT 
 Their plans. Until this changes, the Voting is Inappropriate. 




 I think the Presidency Offered a very clear option: negotiate with 
 LACNIC the terms of a possible understanding, I putting the substance 
 the form, and return to the community When you have a specific instrument in 
 Which LACNIC estdispuesto register to participate in the terms That Arise. 




 The mocin particular order is: ask the Presidency (and where Appropriate 
 the Secretariat) to withdraw the proposal and not again Formulate Voting 
 but until there is a match specific text That has the 
 LACNIC Commitment. 




 Alejandro Pisanty 








 2013/11/26 <sylvia at internautabrasil.org <mailto:sylvia at internautabrasil.org> &gt; 
 > Dear Members LACRALO: 
 > 
 > As in our wiki page, 
 >  https://community.icann.org/display/LACRALO/LACRALO+LACNIC+Agreement, 
 > The 
 > Telecof last November where we were several representatives present 
 > Face to face and others in remote participation, there were many comments 
 > Different about wanting or not signing a Memorandum of Understanding.
 > 
 > So to save time, the secretary and the president wants 
 > Voting propose a region to decide whether or not you want to sign 
 > An 
 > MOU with LACNIC. 
 > 
 > The question being: 
 > 
 > Your ALS estde agreed to sign a Memorandum of Understanding with LACNIC [ERROR: Sentence too long to translate (2078&gt; 1800 bytes)]? 
 > 
 > Http://www.lacralo.org 
 > 












 --------------------------- 
 Dr.Alejandro Pisanty 
 UNAM Faculty of Chemistry 
 3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico 
 +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD 
 SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 FROM MEXICO 
 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com 
 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty 
 Join the LinkedIn group UNAM, 
 http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty 
 ---- &gt;&gt; Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org 
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
 _______________________________________________ 









[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b4c9c2b619.html
--]]




More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list