[lac-discuss-en] Fwd: Re: Follow-up on an inquiry Durban During Public Forum

[apisan at unam.mx]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Follow-up on an inquiry Durban During Public Forum 
 From: apisan at unam.mx

 Ada, 


 RAA regulates the relations between the registries (registries) and ICANN, the only thing it does is prove them. It established a set of conditions to be met, even at the risk of losing the Accreditation miss if these conditions. Meanwhile the RRA regulates the conditions of the relationship between registries and registrars (registrars). 


 All this implies trade relations exist between registries and registrars, on the one hand (for the wholesale market of domain names) and between agents and registrars or registrants, who may be individuals, organizations, or businesses, with or noncommercial in this last stretch. 


 No commercial relationship with ICANN none. his is a fundamental aspect of the conception itself of ICANN is important to understand thoroughly.


 As, the consumer protection laws of proteccina the intellectual property, etc.. are applicable to the jurisdiction of the contracts signed, not "universal". 


 The discussion which follows from Durban public forum and you refer estdirigida to clarify whether the commitments acquired by registries and registrars regarding their conduct before registrants are "benefits" or "rights" , which tendramltiples implications. 


 A very strong reason other than "rights" is that if you accept that terminology, it would put ICANN in the position of creating rights that either already exist and ESTN regulated or not exist ESTN not regulated, or not recognized in certain jurisdictions. In either case there is a good route. 


 Best regards, 


 Alejandro Pisanty 




 --------------------------- 
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty 
 Faculty of Chemistry UNAM 
 3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico 






 +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD 


 SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 FROM MEXICO 
 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com 
 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty 
 Join the LinkedIn group UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty 
 ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org 
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 


 ________________________________________ 
 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Aida Noblia [aidanoblia at gmail.com] 
 Posted on: Sunday, November 10, 2013 11:15 
 To: <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
 Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] [At-Large] Fwd: Re: Follow-up on an inquiry Durban During Public Forum 


 Dear all: 


 According To copyright laws or consumer consumption, ICANN would be 
 providing a service. These laws are mandatory in all countries or That You 
 can not waive your application. The service user is a consumer, is third 
 Which is not part of the contract.The third is the beneficiary of That 
 Contract. The laws Establish the liability of the supplier (In this case 
 ICANN) for the service to the end user (In this case the third party will 
 use the domain name) 


 But These laws protect end users, When service users are not commercial 
 enterprises. 


 Kind regards 




 - 
 Aida Noblia 
 _______________________________________________ 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/073c2fcbec.html
--]]