[lac-discuss-en] Fwd: CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the DNS Risk Management Framework Report
apisan at unam.mx
apisan at unam.mx
Tue Sep 10 18:57:10 UTC 2013
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: Fwd: CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the DNS Risk Management Framework Report
From: apisan at unam.mx
Colleagues,
on the subject of Risk Framework DNS Administration, specifically the working group "Board" about it, permtanme comment as follows:
As some of you know this process is part of the ways in which ICANN estabsorbiendo the recommendations made by the SSR-RT (Stability, Security and Resilience of the DNS Review Team), I had the honor of presiding at the per period 2010 to 2012. The SSR-RT realizuna revision of compliance with ICANN's obligations in terms of stability, security and robustness / resilience of the global DNS as part of their agreements with the Department of Commerce U.S. government (AoC or Affirmation of Commitments).
One of the main recommendations of the SSR-RT was the creation of the framework of risk administration and its management at the highest level of the organization, namely the Board.In response to this recommendation, the Board creun working group with members of the Board itself and after some analysis hires a company to develop proposals for the construction of such a framework. We who are currently analysis is the resulting document of that consultant.
Also a group formparte analizlas best practices available for the management of IT ICANN in early 2013 and for this and other interactions am aware of the operaciny planeacin on issues of stability, security and robustness of DNS by ICANN. They are part of the same issue in new gTLDs collisions and community assessments of proposed gTLDs and other recent activities.
In my view the process that cares about its speed to ALAC estsiendo too fast but not too slow, and occurs at a "meta" level abstracciny distance from the reality of the administration No risk is too high, too far, too focused on process and not on risk and its management, and too exposed to undue Dilution of responsibilities.
So I am against the recommendations ALAC estproponiendo draft and instead propose that we express in favor of an advance msrpido, and that ste lead to greater responsibility in the comprehension of the Board ny Gestin of risks to the DNS.
All this must occur without reducing the necessary opportunities for the participation of the community and in particular is necessary to recommend the resumption the results of the group called DSSA (group formed by the community for the identification of specific risks to DNS and operate parallel to SSR-RT, with good coordination between the two since estbamos at different abstraction levels and with complementary objectives and missions; Mikey O'Connor and I, and members of both groups work, we get instead of competition and a collision between the two groups were structured our work with a magnificent complementarity and collaboration). However, I find misplaced enrgicos the draft terms ALAC on this topic.
One of the ways it is possible to complement the sense of urgency that we have more people familiar with the matter of DNS security and stability in the sense of inclusion and consequent slowness proposed draft ALAC is recommend that the Group Working on Board Risk Management Framework identifies DNS shortest term in a set of high-probability risk-high impact and start trading on hese as soon as possible. By doing aspodrconvocar to community involvement on issues more concrete and test their approaches before expanding the total of a much bigger universe.
Best regards.
Alejandro Pisanty
---------------------------
Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
Faculty of Chemistry UNAM
3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 FROM MEXICO
Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
Join the LinkedIn group UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
________________________________________
From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Maple JosFrancisco [josefranciscoarce at gmail.com]
Posted on: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 11:06
To: Fatima Cambronero
CC: Spanish LACRALO
Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the DNS Risk Management Framework Report
Dear Fatima,
I think also important for us to rule on this issue.
Having ALAC ledo draft, I think deberamos support
declaration regarding the importance of having a framework for
Risk Management, but considering that the amplitude may not be
entirely beneficial, being seen by the different actors of different
ways and difficult to achieve consensus. Therefore support deberamos
ALAC request as much internal discussion ICANN staff,
as the different views of the community.
With regard to the estimate of the resources we need to evaluate the
recommendation to the ICANN staff examine in greater detail
The implications of resources and the initial implementacin
ongoing maintenance of the Risk Management framework especfica before
recommending to the ICANN Board whether it should be adopted.
I know that time is short, the report is 71 pages, in English with 8
annexes, and have 5 days, but speak out supporting deberamos
need for further deliberation before implementacin.
This is the link to the document:
http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/dns-rmf-final-23aug13-en.htm
I welcome your comments
Regards
JosArce
On September 9, 2013 22:10, Fatima Cambronero <
fatimacambronero at gmail.com> wrote:
> Estimados,
>
> Reenvió este correo que ha sido enviado a la lista de ALAC, en cuyo espacio
> se está abriendo a comentarios el primer borrador sobre el Reporte del
> Marco de Gestión de Riesgo del DNS ** (DNS Risk Management Framework
> Report). Los comentarios se recibirán hasta el 15 de Septiembre.
>
> Considero que la gestión de riesgos del DNS es un tema importante sobre el
> cual nos debemos pronunciar como RALO, ya que de la manera en que se lo
> gestione/administre, se podrá afectar la seguridad, la estabilidad
> operacional y la interoperabilidad misma de Internet.
>
> En este caso tenemos dos opciones para pronunciarnos: elaborando nuestra
> propia declaración como RALO o sumando nuestros comentarios a la
> declaración de ALAC que ya se ha redactado.
>
> Aquí está en enlace a la declaración de ALAC:
>
> https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+DNS+Risk+Management+Framework+Report+Workspace
>
> Y aquí el enlace para descargar el borrador elaborado por el DNS Risk
> Management Framework Working Group (DNS RMF WG):
> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/dns-rmf-final-23aug13-en.htm
>
> Me gustaría conocer su opinión, si consideran que podemos organizarnos para
> pronunciarnos y si existen interesados en analizar y participar de una
> declaración sobre este tema; así como también si es del interés de la
> Presidencia y la Secretaría de LACRALO el apoyar comentarios sobre el tema.
>
> ¿Qué opinan?
>
> Saludos cordiales,
>
> Fatima Cambronero
>
> ** la traducción al español es mía, disculpas si no es correcta.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff at atlarge.icann.org>
> Date: 2013/9/9
> Subject: [ALAC-Announce] CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the DNS Risk
> Management Framework Report
> To: "alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org" <
> alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, has asked that a call for
> comments be made on the draft "ALAC Statement on the DNS Risk Management
> Framework Report<https://community.icann.org/x/XQOMAg>" in preparation for
> the start of the ALAC ratification process.
>
> The current draft, as well as additional information on the Public Comment,
> can be found on the At-Large DNS Risk Management Framework Report
> Workspace<
> https://community.icann.org/x/XQOMAg>.
>
> Please submit any comments on the workspace using the comments function by
> 15-September-2013 23:59 UTC.
>
> Regards,
>
> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie
> Peregrine and Julia Charvolen
> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
> E-mail: staff at atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC-Announce mailing list
> ALAC-Announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>
>
>
> --
> *Fatima Cambronero*
> Abogada-Argentina
>
> Phone: +54 9351 5282 668
> Twitter: @facambronero
> Skype: fatima.cambronero
>
> *Join the LACRALO/ICANN discussions:*
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>
> *Join the Diplo Internet Governance Community discussions:*
> http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/
>
> *Join to the Internet Society (ISOC): *http://www.internetsociety.org/
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-es mailing list
> lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>
> http://www.lacralo.org
>
Arce, Jos
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/9cb8fa4bd8.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list